Well more importantly - big names that there is expected mutual interest?Yes.
Well more importantly - big names that there is expected mutual interest?Yes.
I mean, right now he would clearly be a starter and we don't appear to be close to anyone else, so that is a bid odd given the Dix decisionSellers I think was mostly role related.
waiting on the gritty i told you so
Now on THIS one you get the "I told you so"Sellers I think was mostly role related.
You just made the "Insider Watch List"Sarr is getting a ton of NBA interest. One scout I talk to thinks he’s 1st round right now
And worth noting that even the two years they overlapped, Tomi played significantly more than Z. In his last season there, Z played 18 ABA games at 9.0 min per.In theory, sure, but Tomi stayed and played another whole season as a pro in the Balkans.
The NCAA ruling that he was eligible, but as a sophomore, was unprecedented as far as I know.
And it begs the question, uh.... is it open season on just buying any European pro with less than four years experience?
He was a "Plan A" sixth man, not a "Plan A" starter. As far as us "not being close" to anyone else, It's April 4th... The tournament isn't even over yet.I mean, right now he would clearly be a starter and we don't appear to be close to anyone else, so that is a bid odd given the Dix decision
Publicly not close on others. But we are.I mean, right now he would clearly be a starter and we don't appear to be close to anyone else, so that is a bid odd given the Dix decision
wouldn't call it "cleanly" there was a whole process that ended with him being randomly declared a Sophomore and having to make a payment to charity to account for his professional experience (no idea how that works). Seems more like the NCAA just having no idea what to do about anything anymore.For me, the question isn't so much looking for more KJ's (college freshman-aged stud prospects emerging from European youth teams), but looking for more Ivisic's (experienced European professionals who are - for whatever reason - NCAA-eligible)
I still kinda don't understand how Tomi got eligibility so cleanly last year. But we should push that envelope absolutely as far as it can go.
The thing about those back channel conversations is other programs are having them too, and then when the bidding war begins we aren't the only ones throwing in money.
I do think this notion of us as top-10 in NIL deserves some skepticism though. If it's mostly about money these days, and we have more money than 95% of other programs, shouldn't we be hitting on our Plan A guys with a little higher frequency?
I took it as, of all the people we get this year, those 5 will be the best of them (starters). Not that we only will bring in 1 person.This statement is hilarious. So you basically think we'll add one newcomer this whole off-season?
Bohanan’s is great, or at least it was when I was there over a decade ago.
I recall the Tre White commitment seeming to come from thin air last year.Publicly not close on others. But we are.
I see what you did there.... good one.Me, too. Some were funnier than others, but I've had my fill of Dix jokes.
Bohanan’s is great, or at least it was when I was there over a decade ago.
1. This is a dynamic and rapidly changing and inflating system. Where you stand in the pecking order one day is almost certain not to be true the next, and exactly how deep the pockets go isn't known for sure even at one's own school, let alone really knowing about anybody else.Bingo! Starting to feel like we are more in that 15-20 range in NIL. Which would be enough to certainly be competitive, but not enough to build a completely loaded top 5 championship roster.