All of that can be true, but the stat that matters the most is that he has a .466 win % in the playoffs. Don't get me wrong, he wins a lot of regular season games, but for some reason, his teams get worn down in the playoffs (time management has been brought up a lot).Before tibbs got to the Knicks... They had a 0.318 win% and the year before that 0.207% win rate... Bottom of the barrel. Since he got there he has had only 1 sub 0.500 record (0.451) and the last three years have increased each year from 0.573 to 0.610 to 0.622 with a conference semi finals and conference finals appearance. Also had a pretty big trade last year to transform the team and he improved.
That's pretty hard for me to see the profile of a coach who should get fired. It's not like he's flaming out in the first or second round of the playoffs.
Not without a championship caliber roster.Thibbs has without a doubt brought stability to the Knicks, but I can understand moving on if they want to take the next step or have a candidate they believe will get them there. That Game 1 collapse was really damaging, IMO. Thibbs is a very good coach for sure though. Not sure he is championship caliber though.
HEY, don't dis the bikini shoots!People go to Sports Illustrated to read the articles? I thought they were now 100% AI clickbait, just marking time, and maybe scraping a few ad dollars, between bikini photo shoots.
Yes but he is succeeding in the playoffs with the Knicks right now... Literally just got to the conference finals. The best result they have had in 25 years.All of that can be true, but the stat that matters the most is that he has a .466 win % in the playoffs. Don't get me wrong, he wins a lot of regular season games, but for some reason, his teams get worn down in the playoffs (time management has been brought up a lot).
To the bolded, his teams have historically bowed out in the first or 2nd round. Over his NBA coaching career, he has made the playoffs ten times:
- 4 times lost in first round
- 4 times lost in second round
- 2 times lost in third round (Conference finals)
Thibbs has without a doubt brought stability to the Knicks, but I can understand moving on if they want to take the next step or have a candidate they believe will get them there. That Game 1 collapse was really damaging, IMO. Thibbs is a very good coach for sure though. Not sure he is championship caliber though.
Without a doubt, the Knicks overachieved this year in the playoffs (they likely beat the Celtics even if Tatum did not get hurt). They did not have a real deep roster, and it limited the long-term prospects of this squad.Yes but he is succeeding in the playoffs with the Knicks right now... Literally just got to the conference finals. The best result they have had in 25 years.
The thing is the Bulls firing was very similar to this one - immediately after a season in which he made the Conference Finals. The Bulls actually replaced Thibs with a very good coach who, in the very next season, did worse enough than Thibs that he missed the playoffs altogether. With essentially the same roster. We will never know if he would have done better in the playoffs, though I kinda doubt it.Without a doubt, the Knicks overachieved this year in the playoffs (they likely beat the Celtics even if Tatum did not get hurt). They did not have a real deep roster, and it limited the long-term prospects of this squad.
My main critique of Thibs has always been the hyper focus on winning every game possible in the regular season at all costs. Many coaches use the regular season to tinker with their lineup construction for various information gathering data points on how certain lineups perform together, sometimes at the expense of a game or two in the standings. I think I read that the Knicks starting lineup played more than 200 minutes more than the league's second-most used lineup this season. A major mistake (IMO) was not getting more information gathering of a two-big lineup of Robinson and Towns in the regular season (I think they only played 47 total minutes together or 3.4 minutes per game). I don't think it would have made a major difference in the postseason, but when the Knicks ran into difficulty in the postseason, they did not have many fallback lineup options that had datapoints of how they would perform together. That is primarily a front office roster construction issue, but not one that Thibs should get an entire free pass on either since he did not tinker with the lineups much in the regular season to get various options to play with in the postseason.
I think two things can be true at the same time, the Knicks wildly overachieved in the postseason but also disappointed as well when it mattered the most. The justification (as the Knicks have stated) of firing Thibs because they want to take the next step and win championships makes sense but only if the Knicks get the right hire. There are roster construction issues that would need to be addressed, and the Knicks have a history of making the wrong coaching calls. In that view, the firing of Thibs is stupid. However, the NBA of today is not necessarily rational -- see Denver firing Malone less than 2 seasons after winning the championship.
The real indicator of how stupid it was firing Thibs will be who they can bring in to replace him.
The Bulls only made the Conference finals once in his tenure...the first season. His last season with the Bulls they lost in the second round vs the Cavs, though it could be argued that series was the de facto series to determine the Eastern Conference Champ (both would have beat the top-seeded Hawks). Who knows how the tenure would have been with the Bulls had Rose's knees held up.The thing is the Bulls firing was very similar to this one - immediately after a season in which he made the Conference Finals. The Bulls actually replaced Thibs with a very good coach who, in the very next season, did worse enough than Thibs that he missed the playoffs altogether. With essentially the same roster. We will never know if he would have done better in the playoffs, though I kinda doubt it.
You are stating true things and yes they may have overachieved this year but it's just a big stretch to fire him. I totally get be wears people out and that he should let up... And maybe he can't. I would have figured at least another year or 2 then we reach this point.The Bulls only made the Conference finals once in his tenure...the first season. His last season with the Bulls they lost in the second round vs the Cavs, though it could be argued that series was the de facto series to determine the Eastern Conference Champ (both would have beat the top-seeded Hawks). Who knows how the tenure would have been with the Bulls had Rose's knees held up.
I want to be clear though: I think Thibs is a great head coach, I just have my doubts if his coaching style would ever result in a championship team (unfortunately all of his teams have had serious roster flaws, so we will never know). He knows how to win though. I suspect the Knicks will regret firing Thibs, but in this day and age, I am never surprised by any coaching firing anymore.
You're right, it was Eastern Conference Semis and I misread it. My bad, I hang my head in shame.The Bulls only made the Conference finals once in his tenure...the first season. His last season with the Bulls they lost in the second round vs the Cavs, though it could be argued that series was the de facto series to determine the Eastern Conference Champ (both would have beat the top-seeded Hawks). Who knows how the tenure would have been with the Bulls had Rose's knees held up.
I want to be clear though: I think Thibs is a great head coach, I just have my doubts if his coaching style would ever result in a championship team (unfortunately all of his teams have had serious roster flaws, so we will never know). He knows how to win though. I suspect the Knicks will regret firing Thibs, but in this day and age, I am never surprised by any coaching firing anymore.
I don't see a coaching carousel thread so I'll ask here since they're a potential opponent...
@Indy Illini Fan would Hurley take the Knicks job?
This may have been a player instigated coup. The scuttlebutt I've heard, including in a player interview, is that the starters were upset about the number of minutes they were playing. They felt is was putting undue stress on their bodies. The feelings were conveyed to Thibs, and ignored. Using the starters in heavy minutes is his MO, with downsides already listed above byI don't know much of anything about the NBA but it is an interesting discussion.
My thoughts are this:
I don't think there is such thing as a championship caliber coach. Only 1 team and 1 coach win each year.
Many coaches are pegged as never being able to win a championship until they actually do it.
It is just as much on the players, as it is the coach, as it is the situation that you are given in front of you.
We were all questioning if Brad was capable of making the 2nd weekend until last year.
The loss to Loyola was a huge disappointment. What if we played a different 8 seed? Situation matters. Might've made the final 4 or the final.
Is McDavid capable of winning the Stanley Cup? If he doesn't this year what will the media say about him?
My opinion is that the more bites of the apple you have (playoff appearances) the better chance you have to win 1 championship. St louis blues come to mind... so many short playoffs and finally one broke our way.
My point:
To me, it seems like the Knicks let go of a really good coach after a really good season and a mildly disappointing showing in the playoffs.
Making the playoffs consistently is extremely important for 2 reasons:
1. keeps fans engaged
2. generates extra revenue
The only reason I could understand getting rid of this coach is because his message got stale in the locker room. otherwise it makes no sense to get rid of him
Malone?Won’t be a CBB coach getting the Knicks job …
I think Thibs could have absolutely won a title if he ever had a championship caliber roster. He's a very good coach that has done a good job with player development and elevating the floor but I just don't think he's ever had a true championship contending roster.The Bulls only made the Conference finals once in his tenure...the first season. His last season with the Bulls they lost in the second round vs the Cavs, though it could be argued that series was the de facto series to determine the Eastern Conference Champ (both would have beat the top-seeded Hawks). Who knows how the tenure would have been with the Bulls had Rose's knees held up.
I want to be clear though: I think Thibs is a great head coach, I just have my doubts if his coaching style would ever result in a championship team (unfortunately all of his teams have had serious roster flaws, so we will never know). He knows how to win though. I suspect the Knicks will regret firing Thibs, but in this day and age, I am never surprised by any coaching firing anymore.
Reminds me of some travel baseball coaches I know. Can't ever lose a game so you have to always pitch your best, then kids get burnt out at the end of the season.The Knicks five starters played 949 more minutes than the Pacers starters. You can’t do that in 2025. Tibs is a coach that can get you almost there He makes teams better, but not elite.
Isn’t that going to be Thibs 2.0?Malone?
On the other hand, the only way to get conditioned to play long playoff series where guys are often playing 40+ minutes with generally only one day between games is to play a lot during the regular season not play 60 games and constantly take rest days.Reminds me of some travel baseball coaches I know. Can't ever lose a game so you have to always pitch your best, then kids get burnt out at the end of the season.
This has been a common theme for Thibs. Yes, he gets results, but he also drives players too hard during the regular season and they have nothing left in the post season. Sometimes you need to see the bigger picture if you want a bigger trophy.
But there is a happy medium somewhere in between those ends of the spectrum. You can't just run your starters out there every single night for 40+ minutes and expect them to be fresh and fit for the playoffs.On the other hand, the only way to get conditioned to play long playoff series where guys are often playing 40+ minutes with generally only one day between games is to play a lot during the regular season not play 60 games and constantly take rest days.
I don't think the Knicks were worn out and lost to the Pacers because of playing too many minutes. The Pacers are just playing fantastic basketball and present some matchup problems for them imo. Also, it was an incredibly close 6 game series where games 1 and 2 could have easily gone the other way and we would be looking at the Knicks in the finals right now.
I don't think the Bulls teams ever got worn out either. They just weren't as good as the heat and then Rose tore his ACL(the way he landed was always going to result in knee injuries those had nothing to do with Thibs). Then Luol Dengs issue was the medical staff.
Kidd also coached Giannis. That didn't turn out so well for Kidd.If the rumors about Giannis ultimately ending up in New York happen, don't be surprised if someone like Jason Kidd ends up getting the Knicks job. Kidd already has a connection with Brunson from their time in Dallas.