That the B1G publicly supports the filing, and that W waited until after House settlement approved to file is noteworthy to me. Especially the former. Without that, I’d have said that W is just really butthurt (courthouse legal term).
Still, just because one can do something, doesn’t mean that it is wise to do so.
I’m glad it’s Wiscy doing this and not Illinois.
Puts Fickell and Super Mario in a posture of being embroiled in a public bitter divorce court of sorts. Often, neither side is the winner in a broad sense in such a case.
Eventhough W is going after U for tortious interference w/re to K, public focus i think is going to at least equally focus on W as wanting to tie down the player and add an element of ‘if we can’t have you, then nobody can’.
[In a way that’s different than reasonable non compete clauses and early termination without cause. From what I’ve read, neither the original W document nor the action filed by W is seeking specific performance of personal services as a remedy, but I expect the discussion around the case to take on that feel.]
That perception can’t be a positive for future player acquisition and retention, can it?
Glad someone is going after ‘U’. Happy it’s not ‘us’. Gotta think there’s at least 16 other fan bases that feel same.
If only Manny was still U HC.

