Illini Football 2025

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1      

Dan

Admin
Welcome to the Illinois Football 2025 thread :illinois:


Schedule | Roster | Tickets


2025 Illini Football (4-1, 1-1)
DateOpponentResult
Fri, Aug 29Western IllinoisW 52-3
Sat, Sept 6at DukeW 45-19
Sat, Sept 13Western MichiganW 38-0
Sat, Sept 20at IndianaL 10-63
Sat, Sept 27USCW 34-32
Sat, Oct 4at Purdue11:00am BTN
Sat, Oct 11Ohio State11:00am FOX
Sat, Oct 25at Washington
Sat, Nov 1Rutgers
Sat, Nov 15Maryland
Sat, Nov 22at Wisconsin
Sat, Nov 29Northwestern

All times CT
 
Last edited:
#2      
hd anything GIF
 
#3      
When do we expect an announcement for the Illinois - Indiana start time?
 
#5      
If they are doing the announcements the same way as last season, it'll be-

Next Monday, Sept 8, at 12:00pm CT posted at https://x.com/B1Gfootball

That makes sense. Optimal timing for the networks because then they'll know if it's 2-1 or 3-0 Illinois against 3-0 Indiana.
 
#9      
One interesting data point from SP+: we only play two top 50 offenses all year:

Offense ranks:

Western Illinois: N/A
Duke: 52
Western Michigan: 119
Indiana: 50
USC: 2
Purdue: 102
Ohio St: 10
Washington: 51
Rutgers: 61
Maryland: 72
Wisconsin: 78
Northwestern: 134

Illinois offense / defense ranks: 31 / 20.
 
#11      
Just reading through the DIA FY2025 Update

  • Illinois Athletics secured more than $155 million in new development business, marking the highest in the history of the program
  • I FUND accounted for $14.1 million, which is an 85% increase from the previous year
  • The number of active donors continues to climb totaling 6,590, including 1,693 new donors
  • Nearly 3,000 of current donors increased their membership level from last year to this year
Questions:

Assuming the 2024 football season is responsible for most of these increases, how much pressure is on Bielema and staff to continue the success for revenue reasons this season and beyond?

Does it have any effect on their decision making/preparation/recruiting and NIL or is it business as usual? Just try to win games and let everything else take care of itself?

What about pressure on Whitman? Is now the time to strike the loyal and generous big donors?

Would another 8-10 win season help increase these numbers again next year or is that not realistic?
 
#16      
One interesting data point from SP+: we only play two top 50 offenses all year:

Offense ranks:

Western Illinois: N/A
Duke: 52
Western Michigan: 119
Indiana: 50
USC: 2
Purdue: 102
Ohio St: 10
Washington: 51
Rutgers: 61
Maryland: 72
Wisconsin: 78
Northwestern: 134

Illinois offense / defense ranks: 31 / 20.

I think that's perfect for us. Our offense is experienced enough to manufacture points against good defenses.

And I could see that USC game being an instant classic. High scoring, back and forth, edge of your seat type of game.
 
#17      
One interesting data point from SP+: we only play two top 50 offenses all year:

Offense ranks:

Western Illinois: N/A
Duke: 52
Western Michigan: 119
Indiana: 50
USC: 2
Purdue: 102
Ohio St: 10
Washington: 51
Rutgers: 61
Maryland: 72
Wisconsin: 78
Northwestern: 134

Illinois offense / defense ranks: 31 / 20.

This is already bumped up to four (Indiana and Washington improved). What sticks out to me is that USC and Ohio State are both elite, elite offenses and the rest is average or worse. It's also week 1, so I would expect at least one of these teams (Indiana? Washington? Rutgers??) to rise in offensive efficiency. There's also a chance that this week will be the third-best offense that Illinois faces all year.
 
#18      
Just wanted to pop in to say that with our home opener now in the books and two games officially sold out, these are the crowds of above 50k since ole Tim Beckman arrived on the scene in 2012. Just for fun, I added in the remaining attendance guesses for this year by @IlliniInBuckeyeState, as they will all very clearly be above 50k.

Bielema Era
Lovie Era
Beckman/Cubit Era

2025: 60,670 vs. Ohio State
2025: 60,670 vs. Western Michigan
2024: 60,670 vs. #24 Michigan
2024: 60,670 vs. #19 Kansas

2016: 60,670 vs. North Carolina
**2025: 60,077 vs. USC (guess)**
2024: 58,088 vs. Minnesota
2022: 56,092 vs. Michigan State
2025: 56,040 vs. Western Illinois
2024: 55,815 vs. Purdue
** 2025: 55,414 vs. Rutgers (guess)**
2023: 54,205 vs. Wisconsin
2023: 53,512 vs. FAU
2023: 53,157 vs. Indiana
2024: 52,660 vs. Michigan State
** 2025: 52,215 vs. Maryland (guess) **

2015: 51,515 vs. #3 Ohio State
2024: 51,498 vs. Central Michigan
** 2025: 50,380 vs. Northwestern (guess) **

2014: 50,373 vs. Iowa

Bravo, Bret!! 20 crowds of 50k or more, and 17 of them (85%) will have occurred since Bielema took over this program. He will also have 10 of the 11 crowds of 55k+ (91%). When you also consider that the only non-Bilemea games on the list were a somewhat fluke sellout vs. UNC in Lovie's second game (attendance dropped IMMEDIATELY into the 40-45k range right after that) and two Beckman Era games that barely scraped past 50k and probably included a ton of traveling Iowa/OSU fans ... the increase in interest that Bret has been able to create is nothing short of a seismic shift.

The POTENTIAL interest was always there, and even through the dark years I stubbornly maintained to my non-Illini friends AND pessimistic Illini fans here that we had a large fan base on paper and we were just as capable as anyone else of being passionate and engaged fans ... in other words, there wasn't just something in the water in the Land of Lincoln, and we needed someone to give us something to cheer about!!
 
#19      
Just wanted to pop in to say that with our home opener now in the books and two games officially sold out, these are the crowds of above 50k since ole Tim Beckman arrived on the scene in 2012. Just for fun, I added in the remaining attendance guesses for this year by @IlliniInBuckeyeState, as they will all very clearly be above 50k.

Bielema Era
Lovie Era
Beckman/Cubit Era

2025: 60,670 vs. Ohio State
2025: 60,670 vs. Western Michigan
2024: 60,670 vs. #24 Michigan
2024: 60,670 vs. #19 Kansas

2016: 60,670 vs. North Carolina
**2025: 60,077 vs. USC (guess)**
2024: 58,088 vs. Minnesota
2022: 56,092 vs. Michigan State
2025: 56,040 vs. Western Illinois
2024: 55,815 vs. Purdue
** 2025: 55,414 vs. Rutgers (guess)**
2023: 54,205 vs. Wisconsin
2023: 53,512 vs. FAU
2023: 53,157 vs. Indiana
2024: 52,660 vs. Michigan State
** 2025: 52,215 vs. Maryland (guess) **

2015: 51,515 vs. #3 Ohio State
2024: 51,498 vs. Central Michigan
** 2025: 50,380 vs. Northwestern (guess) **

2014: 50,373 vs. Iowa

Bravo, Bret!! 20 crowds of 50k or more, and 17 of them (85%) will have occurred since Bielema took over this program. He will also have 10 of the 11 crowds of 55k+ (91%). When you also consider that the only non-Bilemea games on the list were a somewhat fluke sellout vs. UNC in Lovie's second game (attendance dropped IMMEDIATELY into the 40-45k range right after that) and two Beckman Era games that barely scraped past 50k and probably included a ton of traveling Iowa/OSU fans ... the increase in interest that Bret has been able to create is nothing short of a seismic shift.

The POTENTIAL interest was always there, and even through the dark years I stubbornly maintained to my non-Illini friends AND pessimistic Illini fans here that we had a large fan base on paper and we were just as capable as anyone else of being passionate and engaged fans ... in other words, there wasn't just something in the water in the Land of Lincoln, and we needed someone to give us something to cheer about!!
Great info. Thanks!

And yes we've talked about this on several occasions with Mr Tibbs usually leading it--the Chicagoland potential is enormous for our Illini. But, and its a big one, we have to win a lot for many years in order to start reaching that potential.
 
#20      
Great info. Thanks!

And yes we've talked about this on several occasions with Mr Tibbs usually leading it--the Chicagoland potential is enormous for our Illini. But, and its a big one, we have to win a lot for many years in order to start reaching that potential.
As a Chicagoan (and more importantly a non-alum fan in Chicago!), I certainly agree. However, even WITHOUT Chicagoland at all, we are punching around the same level as other states, and for some reason that perception is totally the opposite, even among Illinoisans! Warning for a long post incoming...

Using 2020 Census data:

IL Population: 12,812,508
Cook County: 5,275,541 (2,746,388 in Chicago and 2,529,153 in Cook Suburbs)
Traditional Collar Counties: 2,343,574
---> "Strict" In-State Chicago MSA: 7,619,115
Outer Suburban Counties: 958,620
---> "Broader" In-State Chicago MSA: 8,577,735

So if you assume residents of an "outer suburban" area like Kendall County are sort of a midway between "true" Chicagoland and Downstate, you would only remove the "Strict" Chicago MSA, and this would be Downstate's population:

Calculated "Downstate" IL #1 Population: 5,193,393

If you used the much broader definition of the in-state Chicago MSA, you would be left with this for your "Downstate" total population:

Calculated "Downstate" IL #2 Population: 4,234,773

Compare that to the following other states that probably have a perceived higher interest in college sports and/or more loyalty to their "home team(s)," at least prior to our recent resurgence:

Illinois: 12,812,508
Indiana: 6,785,528
Missouri: 6,154,913
Wisconsin: 5,893,718
Downstate Illinois #2: 5,193,393
Kentucky: 4,505,836
Downstate Illinois #2: 4,234,773
Iowa: 3,190,369
Nebraska: 1,961,504

So this is obviously an absurdly conservative exercise given Illinois has like 225,000 alumni in the Chicago Area, lol ... but if we just assumed ZERO support for Illinois in the entire Chicago MSA, you still have a population of 4.2 million to 5.2 million that are theoretically going to be as attainable as other "more typical" college sports states. People will always try to act like Illinois has this inherent obstacle of being a "pro sports state," but that is insanely dumb, IMO ... guess what?? People in Indy might care about college sports more than people in Chicago, but they still care less than in rural Indiana. Same for Milwaukee, St. Louis, Kansas City, etc.

People also might try to come up with the excuse that areas like Metro East, the Quad Cities, Southern Illinois, etc. have "eroded" Illini support because of support for out-of-state teams, but that is hardly unique to us:

Indiana: Over 260,000 IN residents that are a part of the Louisville MSA in Southern IN and an additional 86,000 that are part of the Cincinnati MSA in the southeast corner of the state. Also a ton of general support for Kentucky and Louisville in rural Southern IN and for Ohio State along the whole east border of the state.
Missouri: Nearly 1.3 million MO residents that are part of the Kansas City MSA (20%+ of the state's total population), with heavy support for KU and KSU throughout the metro (regardless of side). Also significant Arkansas fandom in rural Southern MO.
Kentucky: Over 480,000 KY residents that are a part of the Cincinnati MSA, with very significant OSU fandom bleeding over the border (at least for football).
Iowa: Over 120,000 IA residents that are a part of the Omaha MSA, with the support for Nebraska extending far beyond just those specific counties and scattered throughout Western Iowa in general (trust me!).

And what about other instate competition for fans?? People love to talk about how many Illinoisans are transplants (specifically in Chicagoland) or cheer for an out-of-state team (in Chicagoland, namely Notre Dame), but this problem is not THAT pronounced in Downstate Illinois. Compare that to the following fandom splits these teams have to deal with compared to ours, and we aren't dealing with anything special:

Indiana: Indiana shares the fan pool with Notre Dame and Purdue instate, plus Louisville, Kentucky and Ohio State from border MSAs.
Missouri: Mizzou has no real competition instate but shares the Kansas City fan pool with Kansas and KSU, plus significant parts of Southern MO with Arkansas.
Kentucky: Kentucky shares the fan pool with Louisville instate (including UL being the more popular team in the state's largest MSA, which accounts for about 25% of the state's population), plus Ohio State from border MSAs.
Iowa: Iowa shares the fan pool with Iowa State instate, plus Nebraska from border MSAs.
Downstate Illinois: Illinois has no real competition in(Down)state but shares the St. Louis/Metro East fan pool with Missouri, shares the Quad Cities fan pool with Iowa and suffers from some support for Wisconsin in rural Northern IL and Kentucky in rural Southern IL.

TL;DR

Even if you pretend there is not one Illini fan in all of Chicagoland, we have the "built-in" fan infrastructure to have attendance numbers and TV ratings consistently comparable to Iowa at the very least, and we should be blowing a program like Purdue or even Kentucky/Louisville out of the water ... and this takes into account ALL of the conjured up excuses about obstacles to our fan support in Downstate Illinois, specifically.

If you even sprinkle in a D+ level of fan support from Chicagoland, you are now talking about a program that should have attendance and TV ratings (and general "brand status" or whatever) at least comparable to that of Wisconsin. And that is our VERY realistic ceiling, IMO, and we are hopefully on our way to getting back there.
 
#21      
As a Chicagoan (and more importantly a non-alum fan in Chicago!), I certainly agree. However, even WITHOUT Chicagoland at all, we are punching around the same level as other states, and for some reason that perception is totally the opposite, even among Illinoisans! Warning for a long post incoming...

Using 2020 Census data:

IL Population: 12,812,508
Cook County: 5,275,541 (2,746,388 in Chicago and 2,529,153 in Cook Suburbs)
Traditional Collar Counties: 2,343,574
---> "Strict" In-State Chicago MSA: 7,619,115
Outer Suburban Counties: 958,620
---> "Broader" In-State Chicago MSA: 8,577,735

So if you assume residents of an "outer suburban" area like Kendall County are sort of a midway between "true" Chicagoland and Downstate, you would only remove the "Strict" Chicago MSA, and this would be Downstate's population:

Calculated "Downstate" IL #1 Population: 5,193,393

If you used the much broader definition of the in-state Chicago MSA, you would be left with this for your "Downstate" total population:

Calculated "Downstate" IL #2 Population: 4,234,773

Compare that to the following other states that probably have a perceived higher interest in college sports and/or more loyalty to their "home team(s)," at least prior to our recent resurgence:

Illinois: 12,812,508
Indiana: 6,785,528
Missouri: 6,154,913
Wisconsin: 5,893,718
Downstate Illinois #2: 5,193,393
Kentucky: 4,505,836
Downstate Illinois #2: 4,234,773
Iowa: 3,190,369
Nebraska: 1,961,504

So this is obviously an absurdly conservative exercise given Illinois has like 225,000 alumni in the Chicago Area, lol ... but if we just assumed ZERO support for Illinois in the entire Chicago MSA, you still have a population of 4.2 million to 5.2 million that are theoretically going to be as attainable as other "more typical" college sports states. People will always try to act like Illinois has this inherent obstacle of being a "pro sports state," but that is insanely dumb, IMO ... guess what?? People in Indy might care about college sports more than people in Chicago, but they still care less than in rural Indiana. Same for Milwaukee, St. Louis, Kansas City, etc.

People also might try to come up with the excuse that areas like Metro East, the Quad Cities, Southern Illinois, etc. have "eroded" Illini support because of support for out-of-state teams, but that is hardly unique to us:

Indiana: Over 260,000 IN residents that are a part of the Louisville MSA in Southern IN and an additional 86,000 that are part of the Cincinnati MSA in the southeast corner of the state. Also a ton of general support for Kentucky and Louisville in rural Southern IN and for Ohio State along the whole east border of the state.
Missouri: Nearly 1.3 million MO residents that are part of the Kansas City MSA (20%+ of the state's total population), with heavy support for KU and KSU throughout the metro (regardless of side). Also significant Arkansas fandom in rural Southern MO.
Kentucky: Over 480,000 KY residents that are a part of the Cincinnati MSA, with very significant OSU fandom bleeding over the border (at least for football).
Iowa: Over 120,000 IA residents that are a part of the Omaha MSA, with the support for Nebraska extending far beyond just those specific counties and scattered throughout Western Iowa in general (trust me!).

And what about other instate competition for fans?? People love to talk about how many Illinoisans are transplants (specifically in Chicagoland) or cheer for an out-of-state team (in Chicagoland, namely Notre Dame), but this problem is not THAT pronounced in Downstate Illinois. Compare that to the following fandom splits these teams have to deal with compared to ours, and we aren't dealing with anything special:

Indiana: Indiana shares the fan pool with Notre Dame and Purdue instate, plus Louisville, Kentucky and Ohio State from border MSAs.
Missouri: Mizzou has no real competition instate but shares the Kansas City fan pool with Kansas and KSU, plus significant parts of Southern MO with Arkansas.
Kentucky: Kentucky shares the fan pool with Louisville instate (including UL being the more popular team in the state's largest MSA, which accounts for about 25% of the state's population), plus Ohio State from border MSAs.
Iowa: Iowa shares the fan pool with Iowa State instate, plus Nebraska from border MSAs.
Downstate Illinois: Illinois has no real competition in(Down)state but shares the St. Louis/Metro East fan pool with Missouri, shares the Quad Cities fan pool with Iowa and suffers from some support for Wisconsin in rural Northern IL and Kentucky in rural Southern IL.

TL;DR

Even if you pretend there is not one Illini fan in all of Chicagoland, we have the "built-in" fan infrastructure to have attendance numbers and TV ratings consistently comparable to Iowa at the very least, and we should be blowing a program like Purdue or even Kentucky/Louisville out of the water ... and this takes into account ALL of the conjured up excuses about obstacles to our fan support in Downstate Illinois, specifically.

If you even sprinkle in a D+ level of fan support from Chicagoland, you are now talking about a program that should have attendance and TV ratings (and general "brand status" or whatever) at least comparable to that of Wisconsin. And that is our VERY realistic ceiling, IMO, and we are hopefully on our way to getting back there.
Star Trek Applause GIF
 
#24      
". . . if we just assumed ZERO support for Illinois in the entire Chicago MSA, you still have a population of 4.2 million to 5.2 million that are theoretically going to be as attainable as other "more typical" college sports states."

Fighter, Your analysis makes a lot of sense. Downstate Illinois is more populous than Iowa, and Bielema isn't losing central Illinois guys like Beatty and Laughery to the Hawkeyes. MSAs, CSAs, border wars--did you study geography or something?
 
#25      
". . . if we just assumed ZERO support for Illinois in the entire Chicago MSA, you still have a population of 4.2 million to 5.2 million that are theoretically going to be as attainable as other "more typical" college sports states."

Fighter, Your analysis makes a lot of sense. Downstate Illinois is more populous than Iowa, and Bielema isn't losing central Illinois guys like Beatty and Laughery to the Hawkeyes. MSAs, CSAs, border wars--did you study geography or something?
Fighting Illini ticket site is showing SC game as sold out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back