Bye, bye, Kyle Tucker
Nobody told me there'd be days like theseMama said there'll be days like this, there'll be days like this, Mama said
Will likely have to rebuild bullpen. Quite a few of them are free agents. Pretty certain Keller, Pomeranz and Thielbar are UFA. Think Kitteridge has a club option, while Rea has player option. Definitely need to improve bench too. Moises and Alcantara are a good starting point, though wouldn’t rule out one of them being used as trade bait for a SP.Not sure what they need to improve for next year. Need to see what happens after the WS. Fun season overall. I think they overachieved. Not sure which team is the real Cubs.
Agreed, mostly. Endings in sports are almost always bad. We could have played better, but we certainly made it interesting after getting boat raced in the first two games. Only one team will go home happy.Fun season, bad ending. Some work to be done in offseason. If Shaw and PCA can take steps forward, it will help mitigate the loss of Tucker and relieve some of the pressure on Owen as he steps into starting lineup.
Yep, I’m an old geezer, so I remember when small ball was more prevalent and players could handle the bat better. But those days are for the most part gone and people can’t seem to wrap their heads around that. I think this year there were about 25 players who hit .280 or higher but 50 guys who hit 25 or more home runs. I’d bet back in the early 1970s, those numbers would be reversed. And the shift in philosophy is not just a result of players’ mindsets, it is management making those calls in part at least because pitchers are better — especially relief pitchers.Agreed, mostly. Endings in sports are almost always bad. We could have played better, but we certainly made it interesting after getting boat raced in the first two games. Only one team will go home happy.
I’ll be rooting for whomever comes out of the AL…
On an unrelated note, it’s interesting that so many people talk about small ball and winning without the HR… This time of year, the pitching is so good its really hard to string together a bunch of base hits. Yeah, we lost to the Brewers, but we lost to the Brewers when they hit the ball over the fence and we didn’t.
I don't disagree with most of this, but tonight the Cubs had 1st and 2nd with nobody out in a one run game. The runner made it to third base. That happened WAY, WAY, WAY too many times this year.Agreed, mostly. Endings in sports are almost always bad. We could have played better, but we certainly made it interesting after getting boat raced in the first two games. Only one team will go home happy.
I’ll be rooting for whomever comes out of the AL…
On an unrelated note, it’s interesting that so many people talk about small ball and winning without the HR… This time of year, the pitching is so good its really hard to string together a bunch of base hits. Yeah, we lost to the Brewers, but we lost to the Brewers when they hit the ball over the fence and we didn’t.
What is the big controversy about this? Why not work on command of the strike zone and being a better bunter? I'm not asking him to lay down 40 bunts a year. Just take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves. He bunted twice the other night and they both kind of sucked.As I’ve said in previous posts, yes, PCA needs to work on improving his command of strike zone and bat to ball skills this offseason to take the next step. That is what he should concentrate on, not bunting as a couple posters have suggested. But invoking the names of Tony Gwynn and Rod Carew (and Dave Kingman for that matter) is pretty silly.
Baseball has changed. The number of SPs today throwing 100+ MPH dwarfs the number during Gwynn’s hey days, and there weren’t a string of pitchers then coming in relief doing the same. That’s not to say Gwynn wouldn’t be great in today’s game, but it is part of the reason offensive philosophies have changed. It’s harder to string together 5 or 6 hits to score 3 or 4 runs. In Gwynn’s last year in the league, there were 46 players with 450+ ABs who hit .300 or better. This year there were 7.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I don’t think the odds of PCA becoming a consistent .290 hitter are real high. We’re talking about a guy who in 905 ABs at A+, AA and AAA hit .252. If he can get to the .264 he hit at AAA, I’d be ecstatic. And you do realize that he almost reached the bar you set for doubles and steals (40+} this year (37 and 35) while hitting 31 HRs — all with his “flawed” approach in his first full year. So why “settle” for merely 40+ doubles and steals. If he improves his approach, 40-40-40 is certainly a possibility. But he doesn’t need wholesale changes, just some tweaks with better understanding of strike zone. He’s still only 23 after all.
We hardly knew ye.Bye, bye, Kyle Tucker
We need two starters to go with Horton, Steele and Taillon. Cease and Gallen would fit nicely. If Jed feels Imanaga can find that edge, then get Cease or someone similar. If we only get one starter, then we have a battle between Boyd and Shota. Develop Brown as the closer to go along with Keller, Palencia, Theilbar and Pomeranz. We need to figure out Ballesteros. Is he the catcher of the future or a LH DH? If he is the saturating catcher next year, sign Schwarber. We are not that far off.Can we assume Steele is coming back full strength? Is Imanaga going to solve his HR problem? Can you count on Ben Brown and his 2 pitch repertoire? Will Asaad's apparent luck based on his analytics continue? IMO, I'm concerned about their depth. We need a couple of starters.
Johnny! 85th birthday was 10/9.Nobody told me there'd be days like these
Nobody told me there'd be days like these
Nobody told me there'd be days like these
Strange days indeed
Most peculiar, mama
A lot of Cardinal fans down here. 90% of them are morons. I've rooted for the AL plenty of times.I think this will be the first time in my life that I root for the American league in the World Series.
My reply to a post on him needing to work on bunting that started all this was meant somewhat tongue in cheek to illustrate my feelings that there were other more important things for a player of his potential to work on. But, of course, he can work on more than one thing and as I’ve said, everyone should be able to bunt. My issue is it seems some do think he should bunt 40 times a year and others have advocated to turn him into a gap to gap hitter. He does not need to completely alter his approach and very likely his swing, and not play to his power. And I highly doubt the Cubs want a player who hit 31 HRs at age 23 to not continue to work on how to best tap into his power consistently. Yet one poster said PCA isn’t a power hitter. Tied for 21st in league for homers, 29th in slugging and 19th in total bases does have s whiff of power hitter to me.What is the big controversy about this? Why not work on command of the strike zone and being a better bunter? I'm not asking him to lay down 40 bunts a year. Just take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves. He bunted twice the other night and they both kind of sucked.
My reply to a post on him needing to work on bunting that started all this was meant somewhat tongue in cheek to illustrate my feelings that there were other more important things for a player of his potential to work on. But, of course, he can work on more than one thing and as I’ve said, everyone should be able to bunt. My issue is it seems some do think he should bunt 40 times a year and others have advocated to turn him into a gap to gap hitter. He does not need to completely alter his approach and very likely his swing, and not play to his power. And I highly doubt the Cubs want a player who hit 31 HRs at age 23 to not continue to work on how to best tap into his power consistently. Yet one poster said PCA isn’t a power hitter. Tied for 21st in league for homers, 29th in slugging and 19th in total bases does have s whiff of power hitter to me.
The question is and I don't claim to know the answer: What would be more valuable to the Cubs? PCA (with his speed) getting 4 total bases with 4 singles.....or hitting a HR (with a chance of some being with men on base)?The average MLB player is 6'2" and 209 lbs. So - PCA is 2 inches and 26 lbs below average. The body-type alone does not translate to power hitter. Anyone who sells out and swings for the fences every at-bat is going to make some hard contact every once in awhile. But, his second half proved that is not what he should be doing. Plate discipline, shortening up with 2 strikes, etc. will help him raise his average and allow him to get on base more. This will be much more valuable to the team than a HR every week and a ton of strikeouts. And, yes, bunting is a part of that.
That’s along the lines of my wish list for off season too, but unfortunately I don’t think our wishes come true. I think even if they don’t extend Shota, best we’ll get is one top tier free agent SP. And if they do extend him they better be right about being able to reverse the HRs allowed trend. I try not to succumb to recency bias , but it is hard to overlook 27 in 173.1 IP (which is still high) in 2024 to 21 in first 117 IP of 2025 to 13 in last 34.1 IP (including playoffs).We need two starters to go with Horton, Steele and Taillon. Cease and Gallen would fit nicely. If Jed feels Imanaga can find that edge, then get Cease or someone similar. If we only get one starter, then we have a battle between Boyd and Shota. Develop Brown as the closer to go along with Keller, Palencia, Theilbar and Pomeranz. We need to figure out Ballesteros. Is he the catcher of the future or a LH DH? If he is the saturating catcher next year, sign Schwarber. We are not that far off.
The question is and I don't claim to know the answer: What would be more valuable to the Cubs? PCA (with his speed) getting 4 total bases with 4 singles.....or hitting a HR (with a chance of some being with men on base)?