Thank you for the constructive feedback (seriously).
From my perspective, I did lead with some very positive comments. Hum and Jake having solid games and filling their roles is a big improvement. I even mentioned twice that the offense was much smoother with Jake. What I did not include was all of the flowery hype. I find it overstated to the point that I would not trust anything else written.
Maybe a way to see the difference is to parallel the two writing styles to slapstick vs. dry humor. One is there if you look at what is actually said. The other is in your face, you can't miss it. Both are valid forms. An example is my question of "I'm not sure why people conflate observations for improvement with unhappiness, or a lack of excitement?" If considered, it is actually a statement pointing out that there is no logical conclusion between the two. It is presented as a question to soften the tone; understated vs. an argument provoking "You are wrong to conflate the two."
I accept that most people in this forum make orange-tinted comments all the way. If that is what makes them happy, go for it. It isn't hurting anyone. I hope that others are open enough to accept that there are those of us with more analytic/tempered views. That doesn't make us any less passionate about the team. Some of the replies (and likes) to my posts make it clear that I'm not alone. I do put up an initial warning so that those who only want the glow can skip the note; I won't be offended. I also won't complain about the blind rah-rah notes.
Now back to our regularly scheduled Illini discussions.
