Nope. Both announcers were surprised and they brought in their rules expert who said it should have been ruled a catch.I’m at the game. Does anyone have a save explanation for that Clement catch being called incomplete other than Maryland +14.5.
Nope. Both announcers were surprised and they brought in their rules expert who said it should have been ruled a catch.I’m at the game. Does anyone have a save explanation for that Clement catch being called incomplete other than Maryland +14.5.
Thanks for being reasonable. This ref blaming is insane. We’ve stunk up the place!No. I’m at the game. View attachment 44968After having 41 years of season tickets, I can definitively say no. I’ve seen many worse. Today’s are about averagely bad…
You have to wonder what these officials are doing during their training calls. Lots of Solitaire and Wordle being played, I’m assuming.
The rules expert immediately followed with "But since they ruled that he went to the ground in the process of the catch, then he had to maintain control through the ground, which he did not."Nope. Both announcers were surprised and they brought in their rules expert who said it should have been ruled a catch.
Agree.sure looked like a catch to me
Clement secured the ball and made a football play by starting to turn upfield.Agree.
But the explanation was that he didn’t complete the catch out of bounds when the ball went between his legs.
So far I do not recall a single post blaming refs for our overall performance. What I do see is fans calling out some egregious calls. I understand there is a contingent on here who don't like anyone disagreeing with a call no matter how terrible it is, so much so that they bend over backwards trying to say why the call is correct even when it very much isn't. That said we should all agree to disagree because as much as the ref defenders hate fans bashing refs, there is as much dislike for people defending terrible callsThanks for being reasonable. This ref blaming is insane. We’ve stunk up the place!