Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#502      
Yes - like I indicated in my post it's a choice the coach has to make to overcome the talent gap. I agree with you that I prefer a bit more blitzing. You can't go all one way vs the other. I think it's best when you blend blitzing with playing coverage. As a layman, I do think we were a bit too tilted to the coverage side this year.

With the modern passing game, imo, you have to hit the QB or make him throw before he is ready some. If you let the qb with 5 receivers to choose from just stand back there he is at minimum gonna ding you for 5 to 7 yards a play. And if they get that yardage on each play at a minimum, you won't be keeping them out of the end zone very often.

Outside of Wiscy, we did seem to be a bit more aggressive after the Washington debacle. Really need to keep that approach. I thought the bowl game last year was perfect mix. We gave up some yards but we also hit Sellers enough or moved him off his target to kill some drives with sacks, turnovers or inaccurate throws.
also, if the opposing qb never or rarely gets hit, he's not sore or thinking about his sore leg or sore shoulder all game.
Hit him legally and properly and his performance that game may very well decline in the 2nd half . Its not 7 on 7 ball nor beanbag.
 
#503      
So very obvious and frustrating. The talent didn’t change one bit in the 2nd half of that last game, but the energy and aggressiveness sure did.
Something changed in the 2nd half and I don't think it was Henry. I think we lose that game without the 180 on defense.
 
#506      
Because he didn’t have the talent Walters had


It would have been a spectacular failure to continue Walter's defensive approach from 2022 to subsequent years.
 
#508      
Because he no longer had 3 NFL talents in the secondary?


Think we're going to see DBU come back in a big way soon. Hankins to me is the real deal and should be a 5 star. I'm fully expecting him to start whether at CB, in the Quan Martin nickel role, or perhaps even FS as Miles Scott's replacement. Rankin can help a ton when he's not making plays on offense if that's the plan.

Think Eberhart is going to be a terror in the Sydney Brown/Matt Bailey role (Like AA good). He has early round potential on either side, and I think he'll make a big impact instantly. There were some insanely good gets in this class, and he was one. SS, LB, EDGE or WR he'll be an impact player.

Hankins, Ross and Thomas bring you back that ability to man up against anybody a la '22. With how they complemented '25 with '26 (And before), that's a very high floor for the foreseeable future. They're literally a Johnson-Cook, etc. from being legitimate CFP title contenders.
 
#510      
I hope we sign a future NFL center in the portal. That position seems to be the only o-line position not covered in yesterday’s haul.

Von Seggern is a good C prospect IMO. Really liked McMillian and McDonough in former classes. I think you're going to see another uptick in rushing in the next few years due to the size upgrade at C. Intriguing to see if Henderson moves to as well. A line like:


LT Taylor
LG Matelau
C Henderson
RG Smith
RT Stewart

That's a top of the B1G rushing attack in the making.
 
#512      
Von Seggern is a good C prospect IMO. Really liked McMillian and McDonough in former classes. I think you're going to see another uptick in rushing in the next few years due to the size upgrade at C. Intriguing to see if Henderson moves to as well. A line like:


LT Taylor
LG Matelau
C Henderson
RG Smith
RT Stewart

That's a top of the B1G rushing attack in the making.
I don't know that Henderson will be able to handle Center responsibilities
 
#513      
also, if the opposing qb never or rarely gets hit, he's not sore or thinking about his sore leg or sore shoulder all game.
Hit him legally and properly and his performance that game may very well decline in the 2nd half . Its not 7 on 7 ball nor beanbag.
100%. Also, the QB that is constantly getting hit or hurried gets a bit scrambled mentally. Starts getting happy feet or hold the ball itis. Either one plays right into the D's hands.

It seems its one of the universal truths of football at any level is that all good to great defenses have a strong front 4. A strong front doesn't guarantee a great D but it is unlikely to have a real solid D without it.
 
#514      
I don't know that Henderson will be able to handle Center responsibilities
Agreed…seems like TJ McMillen would be the new C based on him backfilling Kreutz throughout the season…unless we bring in someone more proven than TJ. Henderson could still start at Guard.
 
#515      
I hope we sign a future NFL center in the portal. That position seems to be the only o-line position not covered in yesterday’s haul.
As I have written on a couple posts, we need the best center available in the portal. I know some of you liked Kruetz, but in my opinion he was average on his best day as a center and not very good the rest of them. I dont think we have a dependable center on the roster right now.
 
#518      
As I have written on a couple posts, we need the best center available in the portal. I know some of you liked Kruetz, but in my opinion he was average on his best day as a center and not very good the rest of them. I dont think we have a dependable center on the roster right now.
By all accounts, Kreutz was your leader up front and probably maximized his physical talents for his size.

But he could not generate any push up front against P4 competition. I think alot of our issues were exacerbated by his inability to move bodies in the middle.

Not that we had a great between tackle runner...but even Valentine can't accelerate after a cut in the backfield enough to overcome our interior getting blown up.
 
#520      
I'll never understand why Henry completely changed things after Walter left? Why mess with something that was working?
For what its worth Walters was superior to most at scheming up against run fits and attacking weaknesses on the opposing OL. Creating advantage for his defenses which ultimately led to his defenses success.

My largest contention with Henry is that *yes* the talent is not what it was with Walters or where it needs to be but he seemed to be consistently outcoached and did not make adjustments against *BETTER* teams.

Miss me with the *good games* against Wisconsin, NW, Rutgers and Maryland ... 3/4 finished in the bottom 5 of a 18 team league.

Walters regardless of talent on the opposing O frequently had an approach or quickly adjusted to what the game flow was.

This is what happens when the DC you bring in to scheme/call plays has REAL P4 experience doing that same job. Especially helpful when it was in the SEC.

Hiring a first time, never called plays DC at a P4 school trying to win with lesser talent requires someone with a better overall coaching resume.

Since 23' when Henry took over we have not only been out talented but out schemed frequently. The reason we won was Luke playing superman nearly every game and this year that Superman luck ran out many times.

Its wonderful we have upgraded the talent and I anticipate with a larger budget we continue those efforts in the portal. As @Mr. Tibbs said. Friends don't let friends drunk drive.

If they choose to keep Henry into '26 and the defense continues its current trends do not come back here bitching about what we already knew.

Ialways remember this quote from one of my coachs, "When someone tells and shows you who they are, believe them."

Aaron Henry has done both of those since 23' when we should have parted ways the first time.
 
Last edited:
#521      
Von Seggern is a good C prospect IMO. Really liked McMillian and McDonough in former classes. I think you're going to see another uptick in rushing in the next few years due to the size upgrade at C. Intriguing to see if Henderson moves to as well. A line like:


LT Taylor
LG Matelau
C Henderson
RG Smith
RT Stewart

That's a top of the B1G rushing attack in the making.
Henderson isn’t playing center he has a hard enough time playing guard
 
#522      
Evaluations play a big part as well.

For this class, I just wanted to say it's a home run. Yes I would like a few more game wrecker types at NG/DT (Though you also have a few OL who could fit there), but this class is so good. It's also underrated in a sense. I think Hankins should absolutely be a 5 star. Eberhart not far off if you're projecting. Rankin is electric. Those are 3 top 100-150 type of guys.

Barnett if fully healthy come next fall will factor. OL haul is ridiculous with Taylor (Future NFL), Maika (Future NFL), Smith (Possible instant impact as a true frosh), etc.

Alston is heavily underrated at WR. He's a 4 star caliber WR. Thomas at LB, Williams at LB, Cobb at LB, those are run and hit strikers who will eat running with space eaters and disrupters on the DLine. I'm very intrigued to see Tony B's development as a DT.

Really like Liggins as well. Knowing what we do about the trenches though, I feel like they need more. They need another impact NG/DT or two. They've got good ones and signed some pretty good ones, but one of my priorities in the portal would be to try to bring in that early/1st round type of NG to take this defense to the next level. Same with EDGE. They've got some good ones, but I want them to go get a few more guys who can cause havoc on the offense. It looks like they'll have what they need to make it happen, so it'll be interesting to watch.

All in all, absolute impact class and a perfect fit to what they've been doing. Sometimes you have to look at classes as 2 (The year before and the next). Top notch job. We should be talking about this one for a while, and it should be very soon/apparent.

The great thing about it also is this is just the early signing period so there's still time to add (Obviously portal as well).

Now let's get to '27. You get guys like Johnson-Cook, Brown at TE, Wagner, etc. at OL and you're cooking with gasoline. There would be a CFP title for the Illini by '27-'28.
ThaKid, that you?
 
#523      
I have a lot of Badger friends and they bring this up all the time, but don’t get it twisted…they’d take him back in a heartbeat
Agree. My Badger friends say/feel the same way.
 
#524      
I don’t think Henderson will be starting at any OL position …

I could easily see the staff wishing him well elsewhere. I'm leaning the other way because next year's offensive line is going to be very inexperienced. Even if the staff brings in two more transfers that have playing experience, having a returning starter could be a big boost. Admittedly, it wasn't a great performance from Henderson. Very up-and-down (7 pressures allowed against Wisconsin!), memorable penalties.

To the last part, this underscores the concerns about Bart Miller. Henderson was the best offensive line recruit under Bielema (ignoring Dennis) by a long shot. He came in and there many positive rumblings for him during the previous years. Yet, we are ~2 years into his college career and the staff isn't sure if he's worthy of starting. He's had 1,000 snaps and we can't tell if he's just a below average B1G guard or about to take off as an upperclassmen next year. Also, the staff effectively chose Henderson over Crisler last year because of the long-term potential. Crisler ended up having the best year of his career at Colorado under their terrible coaching staff.

Either the offensive line recruiting, development, or coaching is bad (or combinations of all three!).
 
Last edited:
#525      
A PSA about portal announcements. All of these announcements are coming directly from the player's representative and are designed to their benefit. For example, here is Rittenberg reporting on a Georgia State transfer:


Screenshot 2025-12-04 at 2.09.54 PM.png


1,400 career snaps! Didn't allow a sack this season! Sounds great!.....Except Johnson's PFF scores are lower than Brandon Henderson's across the board and he was splitting snaps near the end of the season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back