More turnovers means more fouls, not worth the risk.
And turnovers are most valuable in PPP terms for teams that excel in transition, which isn't our game.
Our game strategy is designed to dare opponents to play more efficient offense than us for 40 minutes. I'd say Nebraska is the only one to really do it, the others found some way out of the riddle.
How the Illini have lost their games:
Alabama - Couldn't hit free throws at even an average rate. Weird anomaly, potentially explainable by "tired bodies" from running ragged. Also, they didn't know Keaton was Keaton at the time.
UConn - Couldn't hit any shots at all. Even Hurley post-game was quoted as "if they make shots at a normal rate they win that game". Effectively the strategy was "count on the offense not offensing", which is a risky strategy.
Nebraska - Defense wasn't clicking at all. Switches missed, Nebraska was able to get whatever they wanted all game. Still took a buzzer beater 3 to win.
MSU - Count on the officials to call fouls on the team that never fouls to get the starters out of the game.
Wisconsin - FTs AND perimeter defense were an issue, mostly due to "they only had 6 healthy players worth playing". EVEN THEN, the game was winnable.
So, thus far the strategies that have worked since they've gone full Keaton are:
- Hope they can't defend correctly
- Hope they don't have all their players
- Hope the officials call more fouls on them