Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

#1,101      
I wouldn't mind hearing why everyone's exes broke up with them.
I dated this girl many years ago, and she had the idea for each of us to pick one person for a guilt free hook up, if the opportunity ever arose. She chose Antonio Banderas and I picked the woman who lived across the street. Things were never the same after that.
 
#1,103      
There has been debate whether the Illini (as of now) have improved compared to last year.

I find "follow the money" to be an efficient way of baking everything in.

Going into the 2025/26 season the Illini were about 40:1 to win it all.

Going into the tournament this March the Illini were about 19:1

As of now on Kalshi Illini are listed at about 9% chance to win it all in 2026/27 which is about 11:1.

Seems like an upgrade to me!

Time will tell but I can't remember being so excited about the beloved!

Not too shabby. Losing KW, but gaining a good freshman class and most of the roster getting a year older and wiser.
In fairness, I should mention we've settled our roster a lot earlier than most, so I'd expect other rosters to improve relative to today.

This was such a fun team to watch - feel very lucky we're getting an encore.
 
#1,105      
Last edited:
#1,106      
Not complaining about having us as a 2, but how TF does one put MSU as a 1?
GIF by Mixer


Big ole grain of salt with anything Lunardi says
 
#1,108      
This offseason (except for Duke) has shown being a blue blood is almost inconsequential. If your school has a good coach and a load of resources you have a chance at anything. The historical benefit of being a blue blood has very few ramifications on recruitments today.
 
#1,110      
Maybe fourth in the big ten… Illinois is going to struggle to guard athletic, physical PG/SGs man…
I think my response got lost, so I'll try again:

I see you got the gif treatment. I'll try to offer a strong counterpoint instead...

For championship odds, all six sportsbooks I checked have UM as the highest among B1G, then Illinois, then MSU. After that, there's a big gap and no consensus on who's next. Still got to play the games, but you're definitely going against the grain with that opinion.

On that note, sportsbooks seem to be converging on:
Tied 1-3: Duke, Florida, Michigan
(big gap)
4. Uconn
5. Illinois
6. Arizona
Closely bunched 7-10: MSU, Houston, Arkansas, Louisville
After that, probably Kansas and Texas, but lots of teams are close enough that there's more variation between the books
 
#1,111      
Field of 68 rankings also has MSU over Illinois. I don't see it. 2nd year in a row they are going to lose top players and not replace them. They do have a good freshman class, but Izzo isn't known for relying on freshman.
 
#1,115      
You think QC will be better than 12 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists and All Big Ten Defense?
Honestly, how do you know that with his size/frame and a summer to body up, he's not a John Wall, one and done type? The answer is, you don't.

Keaton was great for us, but also had peaks and a couple of significant valleys. He had a stretch there where he was taking 17 shots to get 19 points, 15 shots for 17, etc. He also had issues finishing at the rim.

He is not being drafted highly because of the season he had in totality, he's being drafted by what teams think he can be and what they are projecting him to be three years from now. In no way is Keaton ready to go in and play day 1. He'd get physically humiliated.

That's the NBA draft nowadays. In what world should KJ have been drafted earlier than TSJ or Ayo? He was a walking turnover his freshman year, while TJ was arguably the most dominant player in college basketball. The problem with TJ was his age.

Youth and projection > experience and being a proven commodity.

So, with regards to college production, yes..... Keaton's production can be replaced. His upside.... probably not.
 
#1,117      
This offseason (except for Duke) has shown being a blue blood is almost inconsequential. If your school has a good coach and a load of resources you have a chance at anything. The historical benefit of being a blue blood has very few ramifications on recruitments today.
To toot my own horn a little bit, I was saying this about paying players over a decade ago.

Illinois' first five-star in a class has more value than Duke's fourth, and NIL allows that market to clear.

You think QC will be better than 12 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists and All Big Ten Defense?
I don't, but I think he'll shoot more efficiently, which will stretch defenses with him standing in the corner more than Boswell did.

I really appreciate the flexibility and selflessness with which Boswell took on multiple different roles in his time here, but Coleman as a freshman is better suited to just be a catch-and-shoot weapon that can attack an undisciplined closeout. If we put him in a position to play simple basketball I think he'll eat that up.
 
#1,119      
I think my response got lost, so I'll try again:

I see you got the gif treatment. I'll try to offer a strong counterpoint instead...

For championship odds, all six sportsbooks I checked have UM as the highest among B1G, then Illinois, then MSU. After that, there's a big gap and no consensus on who's next. Still got to play the games, but you're definitely going against the grain with that opinion.

On that note, sportsbooks seem to be converging on:
Tied 1-3: Duke, Florida, Michigan
(big gap)
4. Uconn
5. Illinois
6. Arizona
Closely bunched 7-10: MSU, Houston, Arkansas, Louisville
After that, probably Kansas and Texas, but lots of teams are close enough that there's more variation between the books
Is the assumption that Michigan is getting Mara and Morez back? That's awfully imposing if so. If not, they're a really good team, but not in that group of 3.

Florida, currently, is absolutely stacked and is easily the favorite.
 
#1,120      
Torvik has it:

2 Michigan
7 Michigan St
8 Illinois
this one is actually more material... at least compared to those other jabronis. torvik and kenpom do have issues with preseason rankings in general because of a lack of data but.... they both absolutely nailed Illinois last year being a top 6 team in the preseason when the polls had Illinois at 17.
 
#1,125      
I agree that we're quite likely to get a Misko-special, but I wholly disagree that he's going to be a leftover

I bet Misko and Brad have something worked out. I know we paid a pretty penny to get our guys to return but we still probably got a better deal than they’d have gotten on the open market. I’m sure Misko has a dollar amount in mind that he wants for this 14th member of Illinois and it’ll just be a negotiation on what player Brad wants. Maybe we get a better player on the condition to bring along a lesser player like Bilic for the last spot.

Any chance Indy that this is how it works?
 
Back