I love the honest truth that this was a no-hitter against what turned out to be one of that year's best teams and probably the second-nastiest line-up. Unreal. Then a bunch of hulks and The Kid hit some homers.
Chicago Cubs 2026
PCA hit a 2 run homer in the bottom of the ninth and Busch walked with the bases loaded in the 10th. 7-6 good guys. 18 wins in the last 21 games.
When the Reds went up 6-4, I figured it was over and switched over to the basketball game. “Oh well, you can’t win ‘em all, the streak had to end at some point,” I said to myself.
So, I missed the PCA home run. Lesson learned.
So, I missed the PCA home run. Lesson learned.
Greatest 9 inning game ever pitched according to Bill James' Game Score Formula.
The pitching injuries are crazy... I'd swear we are snake bit, if it weren't for 3 walk-off wins in a row. Boyd didn't even get hurt playing baseball... he was playing with his kids.
Hoping Wiggins gets healthy soon and is also ready for the Show... (a lot to ask...) We can't afford to put Brown back in the rotation at this point. He is needed in his current role. Thielbar and Harvey should be back any day now...
ChiefGritty
- Chicago, IL
This is wild, man
I had just moved out to Denver from Chicago and was still without a job. That was in the good old days when WGN broadcast all the games and, thankfully, my cable had been turned on. Watched the whole game.
Cubs have been hit hard, but all of the majors have been. There are approximately 175 pitchers on the IL and probably another 75 or so who are listed as day to day. I’m sure some of those in the latter group will end up on IL. If an organization can figure out how to keep their pitchers relatively healthy whether it be with conditioning, usage, how they throw, etc., it will have a huge advantage.
Illiniaaron
- Geneseo, IL
The American League has a whole two teams over .500 this morning.
I believe we are tied for most players on IL... even crazier, all but Tyler "Who is that guy?" Austin, are pitchers.
The Rays are 5-10 against the NL Central and 19-2 against everyone else.
bdutts
- Houston, Texas
This is an interesting point. Back in the 70s and 80s, guys weren't on pitch counts and there were four man rotations and there weren't really closers, at least in the same way there are closers now. So it wasn't out of the question that a guy would pitch 130 pitches in a game then go out there in four days and do it again. I realize that there is more crazy movement and pitches these days. I also know that maximum velocity and maximum spin rate are king. I wonder if there is or has been a study comparing the velocity and spin rates of the 70s and 80s to today and then correlate that back to injuries.
Is pitching 180 innings with more torque on the elbow and shoulder worse than pitching 300 innings with less torque? In thinking about it, would seem like less innings and five man rotations would result in less injuries but the eye test suggests otherwise. Maybe this year is an outlier, not sure. But it's an interesting discussion for sure.