Can you provide any source for Andrej making $5 million a year to play for us?Not when he can make $10 million in college over his next two seasons with 5-for-5. That dramatically changes the financial incentives.
For one thing I think he's jumped more than 25 to 14. Saw him at 10 in CBS' latest mock. And there was second round risk last year.
Last mock before he withdrew from the draft had him at #26, and his stock was rising. And reading the mocks you can see that scouts were aware he was probably not going to stay in the draft and that was suppressing his rise a bit. If he'd been all-in he might have had a rise similar to Cedric Coward. I actually thought I was being conservative when I put him at #25.
As for current projection, #10 pick will get somewhere between $3-4 million more that #14 over that initial 4 year deal. So fine, add that to the equation. Still plenty of potential to be easily eclipsed by the AAV on that second contract. Immanuel Quickley went #25 (and he did have eligibility to come back) and his second deal was $162.5 million/5 (AAV = $32.5 million).
If you look at the post I was responding to, it was that Yaxel made the right financial decision staying in college another year. I don't think that's clear.
I'm not saying that Yaxel necessarily made the wrong decision. I'm saying that we can't assume he made the right decision just because he has indeed improved his draft stock. That question is entirely dependent on whether he is a good NBA player or not. For a good NBA player who can earn a good NBA contract, an extra year in the NBA will always be more lucrative than an extra year in college. For a guy who doesn't have what it takes, that first contract matters a great deal more so draft position is more important. I actually think Yaxel will be a good NBA player (not a superstar, but I think he'll stick around). So I think more likely than not, from a purely financial perspective, getting to the NBA earlier would have earned him more over the course of his career.
Well yeah, NBA salaries go up every year. Should Cooper Flagg have come back so he could get in on the sweet 2026 rookie pay scale instead of the 2025 scale? At a certain point, you're going to age out of being an NBA player. Theoretically, staying in college an extra year gets you one less year of an NBA career. For a good NBA player (solid rotation player) the only years where you might make less in the NBA than in college are the rookie contract years. And you're going to be on a rookie deal at some point, whether you stay an extra year or not. Going to the NBA early means, potentially, an extra year of a negotiated, non-rookie scale, contract.For two, the rookie scale escalates every year, so even at the same pick you get a little bit more delaying a year. The same mechanics apply to free agency. (All of this is more or less just accounting for inflation of course, but that door leads toward overcomplicating this).
For three, hitting free agency a year later offers the opportunity to be a more proven player when you get there. The reason Ayo is on a wildly team-friendly 3 yr/21M deal is because h
Hitting free agency later also affords the opportunity to be a year older, which may hurt your value since teams will also want to project out, and pay for, potential. Also, some players actually peak younger than others and there's no way to know for sure. How much more money would Tyreke Evans have made if he could have negotiated a deal after his rookie season? He'd have probably double his career earnings. The extra time did not prove valuable for him.
Am I? The post I was responding to made the supposition that Yaxel had clearly made the right financial decision staying in college. In response I used actual numbers from actual contracts to make the opposite. In response you've speculated that he would have ended up as a Pelican in last year's draft (btw Pelicans only had one pick at #7 so how do you end up there?), his usage as a rookie, and on endorsements that don't currently exist as far as I can tell.For four, Yaxel is now a much more marketable player which has endorsement benefits. That wasn't a guarantee returning to school, but it was a possibility that being a lightly-used Pelican did not offer.
The basic math of "the last year of an NBA career is typically worth more than the first" isn't wrong. Nor is the fact of free agency being the real payday that you need to serve out your rookie deal to access whenever you enter. But you're drawing a lot of suppositions from there that don't really follow.
By the way, the guy the Pelicans drafted in 2024 at #21 started 67 games his rookie year, averaging almost 27 minutes a game. That's not bad!