I will join the chorus of fans who loves the new scoreboard, but I wanted to post these mockups since it seems a bunch of new photos have been posted since last week showing new angles of the new scoreboard. I know, I know ... we can't add capacity, offensive linemen would have nowhere else to practice in the C-U MSA, Josh actually personally despises me, etc.

This is just for fun.
With that said, I found a great angle of the scoreboard that (IMO) shows JUST how close we are to having the SEZ in a spot where it can truly look SO much better without costing us much money, if at all.
Current State | This is what the new scoreboard and Horseshoe looked like just before the home opener.
Update #1 | Simply fill in the gap of empty space to make the EXACT same Horseshoe structure merely match the first row of seats to either side of it. Again, this is what we would NORMALLY expect like one year after the track was removed, lol ... this is hardly a "renovation!"

However, I think it makes a huge difference visually, and this could become an absolutely perfect spot for the student section if we can just get that first row down closer to the action...
BOOM. For almost zero cost, you have made the cheapest seats in the stadium all of a sudden a place practically MADE for a wall of students. Again, the issue with the current student section is NOT that it's in the end zone seats ... it's that they're set up so far in the air in the most open part of the stadium where they have a disproportionately small impact on our gameday atmosphere and crowd noise.
Update #2 | For those of us who think the architecture of GMS is a priority (should be all of us!!), then you just slap a brick wall of some kind that honors the look of the stadium behind the last row of the Horseshoe. This (A) ties the stadium together better aesthetically, (B) provides the necessary height to trap more crowd noise / be more imposing and (C) leaves the option open down the road to add a second deck of seats if demand for attendance skyrockets due to continued success.
The DIA probably wouldn't want to pay for the quality / style of architecture from the original towers, but hey ... it's Chat GPT's best effort.

Seriously, though ... what more do we need out of the SEZ? The only reason to keep waiting to do anything is if we have some massive long-term plan, but why do we NEED a long-term plan?! The 2016 rendering would spend countless millions that could go toward other things when a fix like the one shown above addresses practically every current issue with the setup and costs a fraction of the price...