Duke 31, Illinois 27 Postgame

#76      
I have unwavering faith in Bret. I worry that we need infinitely more money for better talent and coordinators to the point where we’ll lose momentum.
IMO, this loss and perhaps the outcome of this season was born the year Walters left and Henry was elevated. Every time I heard him interviewed I got Beckman vibes Lots of buzz words and phrases. The move to a new defense coached by a man with one foot out the door and no recruiting presence in the Midwest and southeast seemed like an ill advised act of desperation.
 
#78      
I'm disappointed but mainly just confused. Offense had wide open lanes and routes in the first half; there's no way Duke adjusted that much to hold this offense down. You'd like to think Lunney saw some new things and that's why he called the plays he did, but I can't understand it. Defense looks bad yes, but it did give us multiple chances to win this one. And can someone introduce Houser to a few of our other receivers please?

Just feels like a complete self-own.
 
#79      
Yeah, Duke has won 8 games four years in a row and won the ACC last year. The programs are pretty even right now.
Yeah, the people acting like losing to Duke is foretelling the collapse of the Illini need to take it down a notch. Duke isn’t some bleh team. They are basically us. Last year we clobbered them. This year they bested us. We didn’t lose to some FCS team.
 
#80      
No doubt about it. This is just a very, very bad defense.
Everyone knew how we could lose and we weren’t prepared. I don’t believe that I have seen High School teams with worse tackles.
Hopefully get to six wins but it will take a lot of luck.
 
#84      
Lost by 4, biggest missed plays imo

Offside after getting the stop with 10 men
Fake punt
Houser missing wide open Dixon, 4 point difference
Their fg from 1st and 30

Game right there

Edit: Thought the oline was great, encouraging with the injuries. Houser needs to run more to move sticks when it's there. Platt will help
 
Last edited:
#88      
woeful 2nd half all around ......losing that 4th down stop due to our 11th defensive player running off the field for an offside call is unacceptable....

it really really is............

5thelement09.gif
 
#89      
P.S. if you’re mad about the scheme, Bielema literally said the reason for transition was not having enough D-Lineman.

On the one hand it's absolutely true that the changes were made on defense completely with NIL in mind.

On the other hand, it's not like we're lacking in football NIL resources relative to Duke.

I do begin to wonder a bit if Bielema doesn't fully grasp how much the change in defensive philosophy changes the whole identity of the program, which was previously so hand-in-glove united in all areas.

And well, I'm not sure what else to say besides "I told you so" to the people who spent the last few years playing make-believe that Aaron Henry was running the worst defense in the history of the sport. Gonna be a long season folks.

IMO, this loss and perhaps the outcome of this season was born the year Walters left and Henry was elevated.
Lol this might be the single hottest take in the history of this website
 
#95      
For as bad as the defense is, and it is very bad, they made two stops in the 4th and gave it back to the offense down 4. And both times the offense absolutely crapped themselves.
Exactly. At the end of the game, they gave us all we (should’ve) needed and then some.

The offense just fell off a cliff.

To me the latter was more disappointing. This program the last two years, was BUILT on plays made when it mattered the most, by the offense.
 
Last edited:
#97      
No way tackling that poorly can be all because of not tackling in practice, preseason or whatever either
 
#98      
I disagree with some of the comments. I was very encouraged by the defense in the 4th quarter (yes, before that it was rough).

The offense was dramatically worse though, and really poor play calling. Needed the ball in Houser’s hands at the end of the game.
 
Back