Chicago Cubs 2026

#2,051      
On August 10 the Cubs were 6 games in front of the 2nd Wildcard team.
Limping home to the finish.
They go 2-11 today with RISP to improve their recent production.....to 5 for 50. Took me a while to figure it out but that's a .100 average !!
14-19 over the past 33 games. 61-60 since the 27-12 start.
 
#2,052      
On August 10 the Cubs were 6 games in front of the 2nd Wildcard team.
Limping home to the finish.
They go 2-11 today with RISP to improve their recent production.....to 5 for 50. Took me a while to figure it out but that's a .100 average !!
The sad reality is, this Cubs team is the most obvious sitting duck in the playoffs you're ever going to see.

The Padres are going to bring in yet another guy throwing 237 mph in every single moment they get into any trouble, whereas the Cubs will never have a matchup they have any confidence in against the middle of that order after the first inning.

Offenses win divisions (so long as the Milwaukee Rays aren't in your division) but premium arm stockpiling wins championships.
 
#2,055      
The sad reality is, this Cubs team is the most obvious sitting duck in the playoffs you're ever going to see.

The Padres are going to bring in yet another guy throwing 237 mph in every single moment they get into any trouble, whereas the Cubs will never have a matchup they have any confidence in against the middle of that order after the first inning.

Offenses win divisions (so long as the Milwaukee Rays aren't in your division) but premium arm stockpiling wins championships.
Stacking arms and being able to score in a variety of ways creates consistency. It's why Milwaukee, despite the payroll, mows down the division year after year. The Cubs are a one trick pony, which can lead to 10 game winning streaks, but also 10 game losing streaks. The stretch they're in now is just ugly.
 
#2,056      
Phillies lose. Padres down 4. Cubs would have to win Sunday and Padres lose all 3. Most likely Cubs playing red hot Padres in San Diego.
 
#2,061      
If the Padres win and the Phillies lose today, the Cubs Sunday game will not matter. Would they still play it or just head back to Chicago or to San Diego? If they were playing in Boston and it was rained out, they would not make it up so why play it in Tampa and risk injuries?
 
#2,062      
If the Padres win and the Phillies lose today, the Cubs Sunday game will not matter. Would they still play it or just head back to Chicago or to San Diego? If they were playing in Boston and it was rained out, they would not make it up so why play it in Tampa and risk injuries?
Yes they will still play the game
 
#2,063      
This has been a bad team for the last quarter of the season. Which is remarkable considering PCA was performing at an MVP level and Bregman at a near-MVP level for that entire time.

Really, over the last 40 games, no one on the offense was particularly bad. Amaya and Hoerner weren’t great. Everyone else was at or exceeded their career norms.

I think the defense fell off from all-time great to merely amazingly good after Swanson got hurt, and it exposed how much the pitching staff was relying on an absurdly elite defense to stay above water.

Shota, Holmes and Peterson were fine as starters, which was probably the most you could expect from Shota and Peterson. I think they were hoping for better from Holmes when they traded for him. Gausman and Boyd were bad. The entire bullpen was awful except for Civale, who may have been the last quarter-season MVP, and Zeferjahn, who recovered from his first few appearances to look decent.

The Cubs never got the help they were hoping to get from the IL. They also bizarrely sidelined Rea and Assad, ground ball throwing innings eaters, for a quarter of the season. Over the last 40 games, they’ve combined for 27 innings.

Overall, for a team that was supposed to win 90-something games and was favored to win the division, winning 80-something games and not even being close to the Brewers has to be considered a disappointment. Especially given the historically great season from PCA.
 
Back