Illiniaaron
- Geneseo, IL
One thing you couldn’t do was take a sack. Up to Taylor to pin them deep.
I guess he does. Good for him.He’s never had the leg
Guess your thinking a 1 in 5 chance of icing game plus you need your kicker to get his confidence back for a playoff run. ....still so risky.Quite the call by Ben Johnson to go for the field goal there.
40 more rushing yards is pretty significant. Though your point still stands.Stats were almost even in every category...the difference...the one turnover by the Patriots.
Up to Taylor to pin them deep.
Quite the call by Ben Johnson to go for the field goal there.
2 dumb play calls in a row......and i cant believe that 2nd one worked
I was at the game last night and was arguing with people in the stands. You CANNOT punt there, "pin them deep" is a stone-age philosophy. There was 1:39 left, that's barely going to change the play-calling of a modern NFL offense needing a touchdown.Guess your thinking a 1 in 5 chance of icing game plus you need your kicker to get his confidence back for a playoff run. ....still so risky.
Agree that he had to try the FG. However, after his kicker just missed from 55, giving up that field position was an awful mistake.I was at the game last night and was arguing with people in the stands. You CANNOT punt there, "pin them deep" is a stone-age philosophy. There was 1:39 left, that's barely going to change the play-calling of a modern NFL offense needing a touchdown.
None of the 60,000 present had any confidence in Santos, but that was the only choice.
Percentage wise based on previous outcomes if you take punt out as an optuon you haveI was at the game last night and was arguing with people in the stands. You CANNOT punt there, "pin them deep" is a stone-age philosophy. There was 1:39 left, that's barely going to change the play-calling of a modern NFL offense needing a touchdown.
None of the 60,000 present had any confidence in Santos, but that was the only choice.
Yeah, the field goal I get. With the way the Bears D was playing, what’s the difference between 50 yards and 80. High probability of a loss either way.I was at the game last night and was arguing with people in the stands. You CANNOT punt there, "pin them deep" is a stone-age philosophy. There was 1:39 left, that's barely going to change the play-calling of a modern NFL offense needing a touchdown.
None of the 60,000 present had any confidence in Santos, but that was the only choice.
giving up that field position was an awful mistake.
Run it, get what you can, and kick a 47 yarder was the right play, imho.
The play call before wasn't much better
100%The truly bizarre call was the one before. You’re on the 30 yard line. A run up the gut forces NE to use their last timeout and you kick a 47 yarder. Santos is 80% in his career at that range. When you’re in field goal range and a field goal makes it a two possession game under 2 minutes, you run the ball.
Well, it sure wasn't 0%!Williams maybe a 20% chance of converting on 4th down and long vs Santos to his point in entire decade plus career a 0% chance of converting.
Sure you can punt. Santos is only 65.5% over 50 yards in his career. That was three yards longer than his career best. Your punter is very good at directional kicking. Fortunately Santos made it, he's getting more distance than in past years but he's still not very accurate from deep. In the end it was a great call because it worked, but punting was still an option there.I was at the game last night and was arguing with people in the stands. You CANNOT punt there, "pin them deep" is a stone-age philosophy. There was 1:39 left, that's barely going to change the play-calling of a modern NFL offense needing a touchdown.
None of the 60,000 present had any confidence in Santos, but that was the only choice.
dislike button
The sack made a very favorable situation suddenly much worse (not least of which because running again on 3rd down opens up going for 4th down to win the game as an appealing possibility).Sure you can punt. Santos is only 65.5% over 50 yards in his career. That was three yards longer than his career best. Your punter is very good at directional kicking. Fortunately Santos made it, he's getting more distance than in past years but he's still not very accurate from deep. In the end it was a great call because it worked, but punting was still an option there.
Based on his career stats, it was less than a 40% shot, he was 2-9 in attempts 55 yards or more in his career going into last night. But obviously Johnson sees him every day or most days and made the right call. I don't think many would have been upset with a punt there. But I agree the Bears D was getting gashed also.The sack made a very favorable situation suddenly much worse (not least of which because running again on 3rd down opens up going for 4th down to win the game as an appealing possibility).
But within that crummy position, a 40% chance at 3 more points and basically ending the game is just so, so much more valuable than 30 yards of field position.
Maybe that's disrespectful to Taylor's banana punt skills, but I don't think it is (he had an absolute missile last night that reminded me of watching Steve Weatherford in person back in the day. A perfect spiral that would make John Elway jealous)
5-10 years ago , punting was the call as field position was oh so important.Based on his career stats, it was less than a 40% shot, he was 2-9 in attempts 55 yards or more in his career going into last night. But obviously Johnson sees him every day or most days and made the right call. I don't think many would have been upset with a punt there. But I agree the Bears D was getting gashed also.