The original point someone made was that he was a generational talent that was wasted. As an Illini generational talent he clearly wasn't wasted. I think the original poster was claiming he was an overall generational talent, thereby 19 wins over two seasons was below what should be expected.
Of course you apply generational across the college football landscape.
If you're applying it just to illinois than Luke's generational talent did indeed produce generational results for illinois.
I think it cuts both ways. I'd like to see an analysis, but I think some of those play in games have allowed teams to get their jitters out. So the winner enters the next game with a lot of confidence.
Probably hard to really measure. But if I had a chance as a top seed to play a team with...
When?
The high school debate was interesting. I never had a good sense of who would have the greatest college success.
College and the pros was easy for me. I never understood the attraction of a short guy who didn't shoot well. ISU fans had already soured on him as he left.
But...