Recent content by sdiver68

Imagine having a team that thrives on positionless basketball only to have fans fret over tagging each player with a position.

Saying the goal is to value an entire season is open to interpretation. I value high ceiling, development, exposure, and end game success (Elite 8+) over easy early wins and consistent but ultimately capped veterans taking down a conference championship and losing in the round of 32.

Most likely some of us see it coming. Those that trust what we've seen from Brad and staff, in line with several other late "surprises" of the past few years.

Good find! 1 of those teams was not like the other...

This is really nice work! Constructively, in my opinion the NCAA tournament is slightly underrated. Also, NBA draft picks could be considered with values for Lottery, 1st round, 2nd round as NBA development/readiness is a consideration when looking at the program as a whole.

KJ 2nd year (in the US): 42.3%

The cool thing, is whichever comparison you like better, we get a 2nd year version!

Or the Wembayama program.

An abnormally skinny 18yo (at the time) 5'10" who played full court basketball 3-4 hrs per day. Without professional trainers and training table. There is absolutely nothing controversial or even particularly difficult about what I said.

15lbs of muscle is not a big ask at all. Honestly it should be the minimum given Z's aspirations and resources being thrown his way. Speaking from personal experience on the lean weight gain.

I agree..offense is set. Defense is the worry. 2- Not too worried about the PG position on offense when we have Mirk as a point forward also. 4-- Honestly I thought we handled them OK IF they werent constantly bailed out by the refs. The problem of course is when they are bailed out. The NCAA...

Proven winner with size, some burst and shot 51% and 42% at high volume from 3 his Jr and Sr yr, respectively. High potential I'd say.

Just scout the walk-ons from the football team. :cool:

Just a slight tweak as IMO T and Z play together more often, and Morillo is a 3-4 combo-forward: Vaaks (30) / Blackwell (5) / Coleman (5) Blackwell (25) / Coleman (10) / Andrej (5) Andrej (25) / Davis (10) / Morillo (5) Mirk (30) / Morillo (5) / Tomi (5) Tomi (22) / Z (18)

At what point do P4 universities with more talent than can play develop "feeder" relationships with other schools? So let's say you have 2-4 red shirts or talented players buried at 12-15 on the depth chart. Those players go to a mid-major with a similar coaching philosophy to gain PT and the...