Elite programs don't go through 4 coaches in 8 years, 2 of which who left for better opportunities. Period. Ridiculous to argue otherwise. You cannot be on that verge when people clearly viewed the program as a stepping stone, which was clear Illinois was.
"Elite" has no meaning, a successful coach at Illinois will always have overtures from the KU, UK, UNC, and Duke's of the world and the NBA. If that make us stepping stone, that is perfectly fine, much more preferable than taking the program from were it was in 2003 and making totally irrelevant in 2012. That was worse than probation.
For the record, Weber inherited a basketball program that had won 76% (78-24) of its games the previous three years under Self and 73% (35-13) of its conference games. In fact, no coach in Illini history had ever inherited a program with better winning percentage in its 98 year-old history. Getting even better, no coach in the history of the Big Ten Conference had ever taken over a basketball program with such high BT winning percentage since 1947, when Ohio State's William H. Dye succeeded Harold Olsen who had gone 30-6 (83%) in conference games during the depleted World War II years.
You can call it whatever you want, but that was the program in 2003.
Last edited: