There will never be another Keaton. (the story; not just the basketball)AND NOW... now that this is done... can't wait to see who the NEXT Keaton will be for The Beloved. Next!
There will never be another Keaton. (the story; not just the basketball)AND NOW... now that this is done... can't wait to see who the NEXT Keaton will be for The Beloved. Next!
We're going to have to settle for Quentin Coleman and his dull, boring 5-star rating and obvious explosive athleticismThere will never be another Keaton. (the story; not just the basketball)
I think it is very telling that the coach who saw them in practice (everyone sees games) took who he thought was the best player available (of the 3) or all remaining prospects.I think every NBA coach and scout has seen these guys play.
I also think Dusty May has never had an NBA job in any capacity and NBA scouts are, well, NBA scouts.
But mostly I think the thing I said was that if the Mavs thought Morez projected as the better NBA player it was fine, but "if they took him over fit despite thinking Mara would be the better overall NBA player, that's dumb." Since I'm not quite understanding it, can you let me know which part of that your post is trying to address?
Eh, sometimes you gotta shoot your shot. All of these guys were going first round in plenty of mock drafts. They probably all will end up early 2nd round with 2nd round exception deals. Going back to college they maybe could have improved draft stock. But just as likely, maybe even more likely, that being another year older their draft stock falls further. If the end goal is NBA and you're not a lottery talent you probably just have to take a chance at some point. Most guys that play out their entire eligibilty don't get drafted at all. It's certain that in the short term, they will make less money than if they'd gone back to college. It is not at all certain that in the long term this decision will be less lucrative, and it's entirely possible this decision will be far more lucrative, despite falling to the 2nd round.
Could’ve made a ton more coming back….
If NBA organizations istened to coach's pratice reports Austin Hutcherson would have been the #1 pick in the 2022 NBA draft.I think it is very telling that the coach who saw them in practice (everyone sees games) took who he thought was the best player available (of the 3) or all remaining prospects.
Panicked? LOL. The first “trade up” didn’t happen until pick 16. We have no idea if he tried to move up, but sure doesn’t seem like teams picking in spots 5 through 14 were itching to trade down.basically bulls gm panicked and blew it. it was unfortunate nobody in top 10 fell and steinbach was the last straw. he should have moved up for anyone even if he couldnt get wagler. instead he settled for a wing that cant shoot and share position with wilson, matas. this shows he lacks creativity.
As the new Dallas coach, Dusty May was probably honest with himself when he provided the "practice report" to himself in regard to his trio of Michigan players. Though I realize Dusty is a bit slippery.If NBA organizations istened to coach's pratice reports Austin Hutcherson would have been the #1 pick in the 2022 NBA draft.
Honestly Morez got slept on by the draft industry a lot and I don't think actual NBA evaluators though as low of him.From their POV, they wouldn’t have gotten Morez had they traded back. At least would’ve been super risky.
Let’s say you trade with OKC and they take Mara at 9 …. MIL at 10 takes Burries.
How do you know GSW won’t take Morez? Coming into today, Morez’s draft stock was thought to be higher than Yaxel (who’s pre draft interviews / workouts / intel was questionable for a lot of teams).
IMO, your argument would work better with GSW for taking Yaxel (who goes ahead of Mara, Steinbach, Ament). If they had traded down to 14 or 15, it’s very possible (likely) they still would’ve ended up with him.
…..
FWIW, Dusty had always thought of Morez as the anchor/leader of last year’s Michigan team. Yaxel when he got there had some lethargic personality moments, often cited as he didn’t know “how to work.” But Morez was the barometer of the locker room. His effort was never in question.
That is what I’ve been saying for awhile. Everyone jumps on the “he blew it; could have made more money in college” train, and it drives me nuts. Not every kid loves college. They get that close to the NBA and they want to take their shot as you said. So they bet on themselves and hasn’t worked out perfect. Doesn’t mean it won’t in the end.Eh, sometimes you gotta shoot your shot. All of these guys were going first round in plenty of mock drafts. They probably all will end up early 2nd round with 2nd round exception deals. Going back to college they maybe could have improved draft stock. But just as likely, maybe even more likely, that being another year older their draft stock falls further. If the end goal is NBA and you're not a lottery talent you probably just have to take a chance at some point. Most guys that play out their entire eligibilty don't get drafted at all. It's certain that in the short term, they will make less money than if they'd gone back to college. It is not at all certain that in the long term this decision will be less lucrative, and it's entirely possible this decision will be far more lucrative, despite falling to the 2nd round.
Evans already did come back once. If he had gone in the 2025 draft, he probaby is projected late 1st to early 2nd just based on potential. He came back thinking with more playing time he'd improve his stock...and he got more plaing time and it did not improve his stock. Veesaar is already 22, and while the odd Yaxel type guy exists, most of the time when you get to that age every additional year of college makes you a less attractive draft prospect. Meleek Thomas's decision makes the least sense, and did so at the time as well. You figure just being 19 and with a weaker draft class next year he had the most to gain by staying. But some guys just want to get to the league, as fast as possible.
Cue the 'we talkin about practice' gif