Don’t make me quote Bret….no touchdown, turnover or tackle from…lolIowa gave up 30 points zero times last year. Please let this happen.
Don’t make me quote Bret….no touchdown, turnover or tackle from…lolIowa gave up 30 points zero times last year. Please let this happen.
The UCLA game isn’t a short week as the previous game (Nebraska) is also a Friday game.Copy-and-paste of my prediction from another thread:
Generally, I have too many concerns on both lines to be over the Vegas line on the season. I'm also dubious about this defensive scheme being a success, especially in year one. Overall, it's a re-tooling year and going 7-5 a year after pushing all of their chips in would be incredible. I'm sure there would be fan disappointment if this season unfolds like I'm predicting blow and Illinois starts 6-2 and limps to 7-5.
UAB (home) - Win (38-10) 1-0
Duke (home) - Win (31-20) 2-0
SIU (home) - Win (52-3) 3-0
Ohio State (away) - Loss (38-14) 3-1
Purdue (home) - Win (28-23) 4-1
MSU (away) - Win (30-28) 5-1
BYE
Oregon (home) - Loss (41-17) 5-2
Maryland (away) - Win (33-13) 6-2
Nebraska (home) - Loss (34-24) 6-3
UCLA (away) - Loss (24-20) 6-4
Iowa (home) - Loss (19-18) 6-5
Northwestern (away) - Win (32-20) 7-5
The Maryland-Nebraska-UCLA-Iowa-Northwestern stretch to end the season is going to be tough. Maryland should be a bad football team but they have a front-loaded schedule and they have the bye week right before the Illinois game. I would say it's fairly likely that Maryland fires Locks after the Ohio State or Rutgers game and then gives their interim a week to install new schemes before they play Illinois. Then Nebraska has a rest advantage. Then Illinois has a short-week and travels to UCLA. Illinois then has a rest advantage against Iowa but the Hawkeyes will be the best team remaining on Illinois' schedule. Finally, I think Northwestern is better than last year and will be playing in their new home stadium to close out the season. The Wildcats have a really hard schedule, and their bye is week 2! They'll likely need that game to make a bowl.
I'm worried about all of the non-Ohio State road games being very winnable for a program that hasn't gone 4-1 or 3-1 on the B1G road in a long time.
UAB - win
Duke - loss
SIU - win
OSU - loss
Purdue - win
MSU -loss
Oregon - loss
Maryland - win
Nebraska - loss
UCLA - loss
Iowa - loss
Northwestern - loss
4-8
If it's all right I'll just piggyback on your post. I am thinking similarly. Maybe even slightly more worried than you about the bolded games, especially the last one, if the preceding two are both losses. Concerned about team morale, though granted the season-closing slumps were far more a pre-Bret thing than a Bret thing.Extremely difficult for me to predict this year as I feel there's an extremely large range of variability that's dependent on how well our OL and DL perform. If both perform well, I do think 9 or even 10 wins are possible. If one of them struggles 7 or 8 wins seems possible. If both struggle, I can easily see us with a 5 or 6 win season.
I'm going with a middle of the road approach while hoping for the best:
UAB (home) - Win (48-27) 1-0
Duke (home) - Win (17-16) 2-0
SIU (home) - Win (55-10) 3-0
Ohio State (away) - Loss (34-13) 3-1
Purdue (home) - Win (34-27) 4-1
MSU (away) - Loss (20-24) 4-2
BYE
Oregon (home) - Loss (48-17) 4-3
Maryland (away) - Win (24-17) 5-3
Nebraska (home) - Win (30-27) 6-3
UCLA (away) - Loss (34-23) 6-4
Iowa (home) - Loss (16-10) 6-5
Northwestern (away) - Win (31-27) 7-5
I think anyone saying 6-6 after losing the starting QB, the top pass rusher, the top O-Lineman and a very good DB from the prior season has taken that step forward.I see a lot of people in this thread still have the pre-Bielema mindset. His “expect to win” mantra hasn’t rubbed off yet, I guess.
will we lose a game thats 50/50 ? yeaI see a lot of people in this thread still have the pre-Bielema mindset. His “expect to win” mantra hasn’t rubbed off yet, I guess.
The talent on the roster is nowhere close to 2-10.I think anyone saying 6-6 after losing the starting QB, the top pass rusher, the top O-Lineman and a very good DB from the prior season has taken that step forward.
Brand new QB, transitioning a RB to TE, having a suspect defensive line and linebacker corp.....pre-Bielema would have created a 2-10 prognostication.
6-6 is blind trust.
Though, this is a bit of the new norm in college sports, with tons of change and uncertainty from a brand new line up of guys. Example: IndianaI think anyone saying 6-6 after losing the starting QB, the top pass rusher, the top O-Lineman and a very good DB from the prior season has taken that step forward.
Brand new QB, transitioning a RB to TE, having a suspect defensive line and linebacker corp.....pre-Bielema would have created a 2-10 prognostication.
6-6 is blind trust.
And your clutch kickerI think anyone saying 6-6 after losing the starting QB, the top pass rusher, the top O-Lineman and a very good DB from the prior season has taken that step forward.
Brand new QB, transitioning a RB to TE, having a suspect defensive line and linebacker corp.....pre-Bielema would have created a 2-10 prognostication.
6-6 is blind trust.
I really want to see your USC prediction now...UAB - win
Duke - loss
SIU - win
OSU - loss
Purdue - win
MSU -loss
Oregon - loss
Maryland - win
Nebraska - loss
UCLA - loss
Iowa - loss
Northwestern - loss
4-8
USC:I really want to see your USC prediction now...
I agree with you about 2-10 not being the correct profile with this group.The talent on the roster is nowhere close to 2-10.
We've upgraded the secondary from last season. Assuming Scott doesn't get hurt again, it's gone from weakness to strength.
I also think we upgraded at running back. Transferring Feagin's 122 carries and 4.2 YPG to Laughery (5.1 YPC) and Valentine (4.7) is additon by subtraction.
Reciever is the least of my concern. We lost Beatty, but brought in Platt; returned Dixon and Clement.
2023 --> IW emerges.
2024 --> IW departs, Bryant emerges.
2025 --> Bryant departs, Beatty emerges.
2026 --> one of Platt / Dixon / Clement will emerge. Stepp has that room rolling.
The weaknesses are O-Line and D-Line (and if things do go wrong, kicker).
This is a great point. It's the position that's not talked about. Tough to win close games when you can't count on 3 from 45 yards and in.And your clutch kicker
Let's just get 6 every time, then you don't need 3This is a great point. It's the position that's not talked about. Tough to win close games when you can't count on 3 from 45 yards and in.
MeSo far I have not seen anyone who thinks we can beat Iowa besides me
I absolutely think we can. I don’t think this is a normal Iowa team this year. I think they take a step backward.So far I have not seen anyone who thinks we can beat Iowa besides me
They’ve won between 8-10 games every season since 2014.I absolutely think we can. I don’t think this is a normal Iowa team this year. I think they take a step backward.