3/14-3/17 Games Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#27      
This can't be great for IU recruiting...

Seems to be happening with all fan bases. This is just my opinion, but I think sports betting inflames the issue. It stinks when your team loses but you don't have any real skin in the game.... If you bet money on your team, and they lose....
 
#35      
Skyy is playing better and much more what I expected from him at Illinois
 
#37      
I don't agree. Izzo is a superb recruiter. His team this year has 9, yes 9, top 100 RSCI players. He's a great coach as well. But his teams are talented.
I think Izzo's one of the best I've seen in college over the years at getting really good talent that fits his system well. Yes, he recruits talented players. But you just don't see a player on his team that's a "black hole" with the ball, doesn't play defense, or is an attitude problem on the court. (Yes, I know we can have discussions about off-the-court issues.) Sometimes, you see coaches just try to get a bunch of talented players with no idea of a system (Pat Kennedy). Sometimes, you see coaches recruit to a system but don't get a significant amount of talent (Fran McCaffery is an example of that with some rare exceptions like Garza and the Murrays). Izzo has always seemed to find really talented players who play how he wants them to play. That's rare.
 
#43      
I think Izzo's one of the best I've seen in college over the years at getting really good talent that fits his system well. Yes, he recruits talented players. But you just don't see a player on his team that's a "black hole" with the ball, doesn't play defense, or is an attitude problem on the court. (Yes, I know we can have discussions about off-the-court issues.) Sometimes, you see coaches just try to get a bunch of talented players with no idea of a system (Pat Kennedy). Sometimes, you see coaches recruit to a system but don't get a significant amount of talent (Fran McCaffery is an example of that with some rare exceptions like Garza and the Murrays). Izzo has always seemed to find really talented players who play how he wants them to play. That's rare.
Also, his Final Four to 5 star recruit ratio is way more efficient than any other coach in the internet era. Izzo mostly does it with 4 stars as opposed to guys like K, Roy, Cal, Self, etc. who have had a good amount of post season success but have needed a lot of 5 star talent to do it.
 
#45      
I think Izzo's one of the best I've seen in college over the years at getting really good talent that fits his system well. Yes, he recruits talented players. But you just don't see a player on his team that's a "black hole" with the ball, doesn't play defense, or is an attitude problem on the court. (Yes, I know we can have discussions about off-the-court issues.) Sometimes, you see coaches just try to get a bunch of talented players with no idea of a system (Pat Kennedy). Sometimes, you see coaches recruit to a system but don't get a significant amount of talent (Fran McCaffery is an example of that with some rare exceptions like Garza and the Murrays). Izzo has always seemed to find really talented players who play how he wants them to play. That's rare.
I agree. His teams have made the final four 8 times. That is incredible in this day and age. Probably the two best coaches in the history of the Big 10 are Izzo & Knight. Knight has 3 national championships and 5 final 4's. Knight though noticeably slipped as a coach as he got older while Izzo doesn't seem to have slipped at all.
 
#47      
Stupid technical by Wisconsin's Nolan Winter has let UCLA get back into the game. Six straight points to bring it back to a 12 point deficit.
Wisconsin navigated that rough stretch and are now back up 19. UCLA did not come ready to play today at all, and Wisconsin shot great in the first half.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back