Michigan State is annoyingly good
Seems to be happening with all fan bases. This is just my opinion, but I think sports betting inflames the issue. It stinks when your team loses but you don't have any real skin in the game.... If you bet money on your team, and they lose....This can't be great for IU recruiting...
![]()
Online threats, harassment affecting college basketball players in NIL era: 'Just leave us alone'
More money has resulted in a trove of problems for players who don't always live up to the impossible hypewww.cbssports.com
I wouldn’t mind another shot at them Sunday if we can get that far.Michigan State is annoyingly good
Michigan State is annoyingly good
Mike is correct.Izzo gets more out of his players than any coach in CBB history not named Mike Kryasldkfjlkglkjetski. I might be a little off on that spelling.
I don't agree. Izzo is a superb recruiter. His team this year has 9, yes 9, top 100 RSCI players. He's a great coach as well. But his teams are talented.Mike is correct.
I think Izzo's one of the best I've seen in college over the years at getting really good talent that fits his system well. Yes, he recruits talented players. But you just don't see a player on his team that's a "black hole" with the ball, doesn't play defense, or is an attitude problem on the court. (Yes, I know we can have discussions about off-the-court issues.) Sometimes, you see coaches just try to get a bunch of talented players with no idea of a system (Pat Kennedy). Sometimes, you see coaches recruit to a system but don't get a significant amount of talent (Fran McCaffery is an example of that with some rare exceptions like Garza and the Murrays). Izzo has always seemed to find really talented players who play how he wants them to play. That's rare.I don't agree. Izzo is a superb recruiter. His team this year has 9, yes 9, top 100 RSCI players. He's a great coach as well. But his teams are talented.
That's the coach they hired out of Iceland, right? Named after a volcano, which explains the sideline tantrums, I guess.Izzo gets more out of his players than any coach in CBB history not named Mike Kryasldkfjlkglkjetski. I might be a little off on that spelling.
Imagine how good they’d be if the game hadn’t passed him by like so many here insistIzzo gets more out of his players than any coach in CBB history not named Mike Kryasldkfjlkglkjetski. I might be a little off on that spelling.
Also, his Final Four to 5 star recruit ratio is way more efficient than any other coach in the internet era. Izzo mostly does it with 4 stars as opposed to guys like K, Roy, Cal, Self, etc. who have had a good amount of post season success but have needed a lot of 5 star talent to do it.I think Izzo's one of the best I've seen in college over the years at getting really good talent that fits his system well. Yes, he recruits talented players. But you just don't see a player on his team that's a "black hole" with the ball, doesn't play defense, or is an attitude problem on the court. (Yes, I know we can have discussions about off-the-court issues.) Sometimes, you see coaches just try to get a bunch of talented players with no idea of a system (Pat Kennedy). Sometimes, you see coaches recruit to a system but don't get a significant amount of talent (Fran McCaffery is an example of that with some rare exceptions like Garza and the Murrays). Izzo has always seemed to find really talented players who play how he wants them to play. That's rare.
I agree. His teams have made the final four 8 times. That is incredible in this day and age. Probably the two best coaches in the history of the Big 10 are Izzo & Knight. Knight has 3 national championships and 5 final 4's. Knight though noticeably slipped as a coach as he got older while Izzo doesn't seem to have slipped at all.I think Izzo's one of the best I've seen in college over the years at getting really good talent that fits his system well. Yes, he recruits talented players. But you just don't see a player on his team that's a "black hole" with the ball, doesn't play defense, or is an attitude problem on the court. (Yes, I know we can have discussions about off-the-court issues.) Sometimes, you see coaches just try to get a bunch of talented players with no idea of a system (Pat Kennedy). Sometimes, you see coaches recruit to a system but don't get a significant amount of talent (Fran McCaffery is an example of that with some rare exceptions like Garza and the Murrays). Izzo has always seemed to find really talented players who play how he wants them to play. That's rare.
Wisconsin navigated that rough stretch and are now back up 19. UCLA did not come ready to play today at all, and Wisconsin shot great in the first half.Stupid technical by Wisconsin's Nolan Winter has let UCLA get back into the game. Six straight points to bring it back to a 12 point deficit.
Hard to do anything when you're being lit up from 3. UCLA's starters have been godawful, though.Wisconsin navigated that rough stretch and are now back up 19. UCLA did not come ready to play today at all, and Wisconsin shot great in the first half.