I don't think the police ever alleged he knowingly blocked the Jeep.
Update: Miller's attorney on Wednesday released a statement in an attempt to clarify his client's involvement in the shooting. In the release, Miller's attorney claims Miles texted Miller to come pick him up and bring his firearm with him, without the former knowing he and Harris had "exchanged words."The Yahoo article quotes police testimony to that effect: "On the return trip, police allege that Miller parked his car in a manner that blocked the Jeep that Harris, her boyfriend and a cousin, who is an Alabama student, were in. Bradley also allegedly parked his car in that manner."
A lot of posters have brought this up, however this is one of those laws that depends on the State and City you are living in as well as the narrative the prosecutor will attempt to push. For example, (From what I recall 15 or so years ago), in Chicago if a gun you own was used in a murder and you did not report it missing or stolen, that is an automatic 5yr sentence regardless of your actions or intent. If you knowingly gave said gun to the person to the person who eventually shot the victim, that was an automatic additional 5 years on the sentence, plus any additional years you might get as being an accessory or a lesser degree manslaughter charge. I think more recently they've adopted the minimum 15year rule for possession of a gun used in a murder. That said, Chicago had one of the strictest gun laws in the nation at the time, and this law is not the same in all states and in fact in many states, there is no enhanced punishment for this.Although Miller hasn't been charged it brings into question what Alabama's thinking on this matter is. To me if Miller brought the gun doesn't that make him an accessory?
The gun was legally owned by Darius Miles, one of the other Alabama players involved. He has been charged in this case. Miles left his gun in Miller’s car, then later requested he return it. Miller’s lawyer maintains that Brandon never touched the gun an he did nothing to restrict the car the victim was in. The authorities have video footage of the incident, as well as the murder weapon.So the question comes down to whether the DA would be willing to try getting Miller on a Class C felony charge for being the owner of the gun and obstructing the escape of the victim. That would likely be a tougher one to pursue unless you had direct witnesses seeing Miller purposely stop the car to obstruct the victim, but they could also choose to not pursue it if Miller decided to provide witness testimony against the shooter for a better conviction of him. As another poster said, people in Alabama have been tried for far lesser crimes on trumped up charges, so Miller should consider himself very lucky, but this is a really ugly scenario.
I listened to Oats initial comments. I believe he clarified later. In part he said the coaching staff could not control what players do in their free time.There is probably a lot we don't know that may determine whether Brandon Miller should face criminal charges. One thing seems very clear to me: Miller should not be playing basketball as of today. Kids get suspended for "violating team rules" all the time. If Oats doesn't have a rule that would prohibit players from carrying loaded guns in campus town, maybe he should review his team rules.
Wait...a defense attorney claims his client is totally innocent? Now that's gotta be a first, eh?Update: Miller's attorney on Wednesday released a statement in an attempt to clarify his client's involvement in the shooting. In the release, Miller's attorney claims Miles texted Miller to come pick him up and bring his firearm with him, without the former knowing he and Harris had "exchanged words."
The release goes onto say Miller was never involved in a verbal altercation, never touched the gun and did not use his vehicle to block Harris' vehicle from escaping. The statement concludes by saying Miller left the area when shots were fired and, learning about a possible injury, was fully cooperative with police.
Of course you can't control kids 24/7, but that doesn't mean you can't take away playing time or enforce other discipline if they violate team rules. It's very hard for me to believe there is not some provision of team rules or the University Code of Conduct that is applicable to actions which are dangerous and detrimental even if they don't rise to the level of a crime. At a minimum, you might think Alabama would want to send a message that this type of behavior will not be tolerated. But, apparently, the behavior is not only tolerated, it is accepted.I listened to Oats initial comments. I believe he clarified later. In part he said the coaching staff could not control what players do in their free time.
Thanks man - I’m gonna steal that to troll my Army buddy who’s a Bama fanParole Tide!
What a joke of a program and fanbase
I need a little “clarification” please. Are “unfortunate” and “stupid” synonyms?Of course you can't control kids 24/7, but that doesn't mean you can't take away playing time or enforce other discipline if they violate team rules. It's very hard for me to believe there is not some provision of team rules or the University Code of Conduct that is applicable to actions which are dangerous and detrimental even if they don't rise to the level of a crime. At a minimum, you might think Alabama would want to send a message that this type of behavior will not be tolerated. But, apparently, the behavior is not only tolerated, it is accepted.
Also, the comments you mention about controlling student-athletes were in Oats' initial comments, not the clarification. The comments were roundly criticized as tone deaf, and Oats later called those initial remarks “unfortunate,” which led to the "clarification."
It's unfortunate when people are stupid.I need a little “clarification” please. Are “unfortunate” and “stupid” synonyms?