Just no more italics, please.
My response to those people whose reactions to anything involving the rebrand is a reflexive, disgusted "kids these days with their rap 'n roll and eating their tide pods" is this:
Not only sharp, simple, and classic, but also so much stronger for incorporating branding which is ours and consistent across campus as opposed to generic, could-be-anybody create-a-jerseys.
Just no more italics, please.
You mean "ours" referring to branding is unique?
Right, you're actually making exactly my point. It's a simple, clean template that can work for anybody, but Illinois makes it Illinois using its unique branding standards.
My response to those people whose reactions to anything involving the rebrand is a reflexive, disgusted "kids these days with their rap 'n roll and eating their tide pods" is this:
Not only sharp, simple, and classic, but also so much stronger for incorporating branding which is ours and consistent across campus as opposed to generic, could-be-anybody create-a-jerseys.
Arched "ILLINOIS" can be as clean as"1LL1NO1S and be longer-lasting, less subject to the whims of fashion. Just a matter of preference.
man that silver and purple combo on the KSU unis is gorgeous.
The dirty little secret in all of this is that orange and blue is not a very good color combo. We're fighting an uphill battle.
Auburn makes orange and navy blue work.
I understand you don't like the font. I don't particularly like the font either, though I think it could be used better than it has been and this year's baseball unis prove that.
But the point is, it is a very very good thing to have football look like basketball look like baseball look like volleyball look like fightingillini.com look like the apparel the fans are wearing look like every piece of mail they send you. Consistent, unified branding creates a visual identity, and that's the whole point here.
Case in point is your Kansas example. Kansas basketball has had, in broad strokes, similar (but not remotely the same) uniforms forever. Kansas football has been all over the place. They went through a re-branding process some years back, standardizing their colors and creating a unified typeface, turning this:
Huge upgrade both for the sports individually, but also the school as a whole. Admittedly, their font is better than ours. It's kind of quirky in its own way, that is assuredly not just plain block lettering, and it definitely looked weird when they first switched to it, but now it just looks like Kansas.
If we want to change the font campus-wide, it will take time and money to roll all of that out, but I would support that. But letting animus toward the font ruin the consistent branding standards by making piecemeal, sport-by-sport changes would be a huge mistake and actually put us MORE on the path of flavor-of-the-month trend chasing in our uniforms.
A good example, tOSU, football/basketball don't match. USC, Texas, same in football/basketball.
I disagree that consistent branding across campus is desirable. A good example, tOSU, football/basketball don't match. USC, Texas, same in football/basketball. A separate basketball and football brand can be appealing as well. As far as basketball is concerned, I could accept a different font other than block(or whatever it is called), as long as it is arched(although arched block lettering is my preference), and that it is larger relative to the numerals than Michigan for example.
Huh?
Numeral font doesn't match.
My response to those people whose reactions to anything involving the rebrand is a reflexive, disgusted "kids these days with their rap 'n roll and eating their tide pods" is this:
Not only sharp, simple, and classic, but also so much stronger for incorporating branding which is ours and consistent across campus as opposed to generic, could-be-anybody create-a-jerseys.
I disagree that consistent branding across campus is desirable. A good example, tOSU, football/basketball don't match. USC, Texas, same in football/basketball. A separate basketball and football brand can be appealing as well. As far as basketball is concerned, I could accept a different font other than block(or whatever it is called), as long as it is arched(although arched block lettering is my preference), and that it is larger relative to the numerals than Michigan for example.
USC actually has been through the same Nike rebrand rigamarole we did. They match now:
A ton of otherwise sacrosanct "classic" football uniforms have gotten subtle changes to their number font to make them "unique" in the last few years. USC, Georgia, LSU, Florida, it's what's going around now.
The block on the cap really clashes with the "1" in the 1LL1NO1S.
I'll take the 7 days a week and twice on Sunday.
Edit--I didn't see the earlier, similar response before I posted from Page 1