Nothing like starting the game with your right fielder making a 2 base error that little leaguers catch 100 times out of 100.
This guy has no shame. Pathetic baseball player.
This guy has no shame. Pathetic baseball player.
pretty sure they wereNice catch. And it wasn't even that close.
C'mon. They weren't serious....were they?
are there rumors of a trade with the Cubs ?Seth Lugo with a fantastic audition for his next team today at Wrigley.
A month and a half ago Fangraphs also predicted the Cubs to easily win the division.![]()
Fangraphs predicts our roster to generate 16.9 WAR the rest of the season and the Brewers roster is at 14.4.
Depth Charts - Team WAR | FanGraphs Baseball
2026 projected WAR for major league baseball teamswww.fangraphs.com
Shaw is on a little heater the last few games. Riding a 6 game hit streak.Given what I see as Matt Shaw’s near term potential, I see no reason to spend any resources to get a replacement for him when other needs are so glaring. Every nickel needs to be spent on starting pitching, relievers, and hitting off the bench. Lots of nickels and every one of them.
I'll play along. First thought is that it seems to be too much to give up for a bench guy and a non-closer relief pitcher.I was looking at ESPN’s running trade deadline column and came across a couple of interesting names from the Twins — Danny Coulombe and Willi Castro. Names might not sound too exciting, but they fill two needs. Coulombe has been one of the more consistent relievers in the game past few years and is having a real good year. Castro is a switch-hitting super utility guy who can play 3B as well as just about every other position. So he isn’t just a replacement for Shaw — though could take a big chunk of ABs against righties — but could spell other players around the diamond. Both would be one-year rentals.
I then ran across a mock trade for these two players going to the Mets. As we know, mock trades can be pretty crazy when it comes to prospect returns, but based on the return RPs we’re bringing at last year’s deadline this one — Mets’ number 7, 16, 22, 24 prospects — might actually be in the ballpark with the addition of Castro in the deal. So while having my morning coffee, I put together a potential prospect package from Cubs based on the Mets mock trade. Obviously, if this trade came off, at most might be one name that is correct. But I’m curious given the “I wouldn’t give up a top prospect” and “I wouldn’t give up much” for him comments I’ve seen, what would be people’s reaction to a trade like this be.
Cubs receive:
Danny Coulombe
Willi Castro
Twins receive:
Pedro Ramirez (#7) — SS/3B — AA — 2026 ETA
Angel Cepeda (#17) — INF — A — 2028
Brett Bateman (#22) — OF — AA — 2026
Nazier Rule (#26) — RHP — A — 2028
One or two starters, one or two relief arms and bench help. Would love a corner infield backup type guy or even a versatile Happ-type OF/IF.Given what I see as Matt Shaw’s near term potential, I see no reason to spend any resources to get a replacement for him when other needs are so glaring. Every nickel needs to be spent on starting pitching, relievers, and hitting off the bench. Lots of nickels and every one of them.
I hope they get two starters, but with Assad and Taillon coming back at some point in August, I expect Hoyer to only get one. I would epect a middling reliever, no Aroldis Chapman studs, which is probably OK. I sure hopes he builds up the bench - it is embarrassing as it sits. Right now if another SP or about any position player goes down, we are toast.One or two starters, one or two relief arms and bench help. Would love a corner infield backup type guy or even a versatile Happ-type OF/IF.
Thanks for playing.I'll play along. First thought is that it seems to be too much to give up for a bench guy and a non-closer relief pitcher.
After checking the stats, Coulombe has been very good for the past 5 years and not many innings pitched. I like this pick up. I didn't check this stats v righties and lefties, though.
Castro seems to be "just a guy". Yes, he can play all over the field, which is good, but he's at or below average defensively (as per Baseball Reference) in 2024 and 2025. He's a switch hitter which is good. He has a bit of pop, not a great OBP guy. He might be slightly better than "just a guy".
I'd be ok giving up 17, 22 and 26 but not sure about #7. Maybe somewhere in the 12-15 range instead, along with those three.
Thanks for playing.
I think people tend to underestimate what relievers cost at the trade deadline. To get a guy who is closing on his current team likely takes a top 5 prospect plus more based on last year’s trade deadline deals. Tanner Scott plus a middle relieve garnered a #2, 4, 5, 24 prospects. Jason Adam cost a #3, 8 and 12 prospects. Lucas Erceq was the cheapest only bringing back #4, #18, and another prospect. So while Coulombe is not a closer, he has been a high leverage reliever last 3 seasons — and a very good one. He’s gonna cost. Don’t think Cubs would get him with #12-15 prospect being the best in the package.
I agree Castro isn’t a big gun, but I think he is a bit more than “just a guy” at this point of the season for a contender, especially for the Cubs and their bench. If he’s just a guy, what does that make Brujan and Berti? To have a switch hitter who can give rests to every position except 1B and C is pretty valuable late in season. It’s good to see Shaw in a hot streak, but having a guy who can spell him against tough righties (think he’s batting only about .210 against them) as well as give a rest to so many others would help this team. The fore mentioned Brujan and Berti have 18 ABs between them thus far in July. An all-in-one bench guy would go a long way to keeping the team fresher while not creating a black hole in the lineup 4 or 5 games a week.