bdutts
- Houston, Texas
Was wondering if Alcantara would be part of it. I believe he's out of options.Still waiting to see what we have given up...
Was wondering if Alcantara would be part of it. I believe he's out of options.Still waiting to see what we have given up...
as long as his W/9 don't revert back to what it was prior to 2025.I’m reminded of my back-to-back posts during a Cubs-Marlins game last year:
“The guys on the tv broadcast are absolutely right. No clue how this Cabrera kid for the Fish has 5.50 ERA. He’s throwing absolute filth.”
“Wow. Cabrera gets Ballesteros on a disgusting 94 mph “change up” with 15 inches of arm-side break. Then immediately follows it up with a meatball straight down the middle that Amaya deposits over the left field wall.
So, I guess I answered my question from the previous “
I think that sums up what we’re getting in Cabrera nicely. 28 years old with 3 years of club control.
SuzukiWho's playing right field for the Cubs next year? Bellinger?
Ugh...Suzuki
And Ballesteros as DH.Suzuki
Suzuki
I thought I saw Bichette re-signed with Toronto, but could be wrong.And Ballesteros as DH.
Get Bichette or Bregman, please. Shaw is your super utilityman.
And seems I am wrong. Still seeing rumors about places he might sign.I thought I saw Bichette re-signed with Toronto, but could be wrong.
And his iron glove.Suzuki
Wait … I thought the Cubs owners are too cheap?!Looks like the trade is Caissie, Christian Hernandez (middle infield, fringe top-100 prospect, 21 years old, at South Bend last year) and Edgardo De Leon (18 year old first baseman who spent the whole year in Arizona).
Pretty solid trade for the Cubs at first blush.
I think they’ll add one of the top four remaining bats - Tucker, Bellinger, Bergman or Bichette - and then likely call it an off season.
To be fair, he's under team control for 3 more years at 3.75M per year, so they're not spending anything on this guy other than prospects. Let's not act like they broke the bank.Wait … I thought the Cubs owners are too cheap?!
But seriously, thanks but no thanks on Tucker, Bellinger, and Bergman (not worth the money/contract they’d be demanding). I’ll take Bichette in a heartbeat
They traded prospects for a guy with a salary of 3.75M. It's a good strategy to trade assets but they aren't adding significant salary with this move. This isn't like signing a Blake Snell or any other big name free agent.Wait … I thought the Cubs owners are too cheap?!
I am looking at 95 wins with the pitching we have. You win by building from within. We have a solid staff ands bullpen. Let’s pick up at bat to replace Caissie and we are set. Quit thinking we need to spend like the Mets. Spending does not equate winning in most cases. What have the Mets, Padres won over the past several years? Less than the Cubs. We are doing things correctly.#9 in payroll and how much in revenue? I guarantee it's higher than #9. And if it's not, it's because they made a bad investment with Marquee.
Right now we are projected to get 82 wins. Are you happy with that?
I'm not saying that we just sign guys to sign them. It's not my money but what is the problem with going a little over the luxury tax for a year? We didn't last year so there would be no extra penalty this year. Everything will change in 2027 so why not go over a little this year?
The only reason we went $500K over in 2024 was a miscalculation.
This team appreciates millions and millions every year. Poor Ricketts.
"Pursuing" big names means NOTHING.
Quit thinking we need to spend like the Mets.
I was using the Mrets as an example. Some people think spending will equate to wins. Building from within and fill in with free agents.Who on this forum said they should spend like the Mets?
Why does it have to be one of the other? Let's spend and build from within. Like the Dodgers do...I was using the Mrets as an example. Some people think spending will equate to wins. Building from within and fill in with free agents.
They don’t have to spend like the Mets but they should be over the tax threshold 2 of 3 years. If they did, they’d own the division. As it stands, they can’t beat the Brewers and that won’t change if they cheap out the way they have been.I was using the Mrets as an example. Some people think spending will equate to wins. Building from within and fill in with free agents.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but it's so hard for me to imagine the Cubs already backing off Matt Shaw after the year he had last season. He really turned it around at the plate and was darn near a gold glove winner, which is just remarkable. Making him the platoon guy just feels so weird. Might the Cubs trade Hoerner and put Dansby or Bichette at 2B?Get Bichette now and I will be happy as a meadowlark.
LF Happ
2B Hoerner
3B Bichette
1B Busch
RF Suzuki
CF Crow-Armstrong
DH Ballesteros
SS Swanson
C Amaya/Kelly
Rotation
Cabrera
Boyd
Horton
Taillon
Imanaga
Steele returns midseason and go to a 6 man rotation or use Rea in that spot until Steele returns
That is a Central division champion my friends
Here's a statistical analysis of MLB spending and win %. MLB Spending vs Win %Spending does not equate winning in most cases.