Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#177      
Well at least he brought the team together in some way, I guess...
Happy Season 9 GIF by The Office
 
#178      
We got beat handily by a team that was worse than us considerably on paper but out-schemed us.

We not only got outcoached in that game, but players looked unprepared, lost and lacking confidence (which at the time I thought was acceptable given it seemed like an outlier, but now..........)
 
#180      
Does Alexander do much re: coaching either in game or between games aside from the recruiting side. His dad is an IHSA legend with 2nd most wins in boys history. You'd think some of those coaching chops would rub off. Realize it's a different game but surely he at least could pass along some good inbound plays since Underwood sucks so bad at that. Underwood's in game X & O shortcomings sort of remind me of Zook & the year we replaced the OC & DC both in the same offseason. And of course it didn't work. IMO, the head man has to have the best coaching chops on a staff for it to work long term. Of course even the great ones have assistants they rely on & help cover their shortcomings but the knowledge & gut instinct type of calls in game have to come from the top.

One I always remember is Rick Majerus when at Utah throwing a triangle & 2 at Arizona in a regional final to shut down Mike Bibby & Miles Simon. AZ crapped themselves, never adjusted & Utah walked to the final four. I have zero confidence that Brad could ever pull something remotely similar in a spot where he had the lesser talent in a big game.
 
#181      
We got a #1 seed... and lost in the second round to Loyola Chicago, which had a far lower talent level than we did.

And I don't buy the "Loyola was under seeded" nonsense. We were a 1 seed. In theory, that means the only under seeded team we shouldn't still beat more often than not is one that got like a 2 or 3 but deserved a 1.

We got beat handily by a team that was worse than us considerably on paper but out-schemed us.
... And right next round lost to 13 seed Oregon State.
 
#182      

That has to be one of the thinnest resumes to be an assistant coach at a power school (with hopes of winning a national title), especially if he has the power to run the defensive gameplan. Simply mind boggling.
His lack of social skills don’t help either. Tough to get kids to buy in when you can’t connect with them.
 
#183      
I like Brad, and we have won alot of games with him here. I really liked Coach Weber, but it was clear at the end it was time for him to go. We are not there yet with Brad. If he leaves, we better find someone who will continue the upward trajectory.
I fear the "upward trajectory" has become more of a dumpster fire riding down the rapids...
Fire This Is Fine GIF by MOODMAN
 
#184      
I know about 25 HS coaches who can coach circles around Tyler and Leggings boy who would do it for 100k a year … 🤷🏻‍♂️

I could give two 💩 how much recruiting they do … I’d be fine with zero recruiting … I know they can freaking coach …

We pay Orlando $900k to get us freaking players … Let him and Geoff cook on that … Let these other guys coach …
AMEN!
 
#185      
That has to be in the top 2 or 3 weakest efforts ever put up by a 1 seed in a round of 32 game. We looked unprepared & disinterested outside a couple of players. By the 10 minute mark of the 2nd half I shut it off & was walking the dog cause the game was over. I've had zero faith in Brad's in game coaching since that day. The longer he goes the more he reminds me of Calipari & he isn't getting the same horde of 5 stars that Cal got to be able to win a title.
 
#186      
A year ago I would have said yes, given not just Orlando's recruiting but also my (since proved incorrect) assumption that anyone hired to be a high-major (hell, mid-major even) coach would have at least a rudimentary knowledge of Xs and Os. But then I watch our BLOB and SLOB plays, our offensive and defensive schemes, and I'm proven wrong.

Or worse, my assumption is still correct and the head coach is overriding good X and O thinking, either overtly / verbally or indirectly by sidelining those coaches and players that can do it, in favor of others.
Let’s do a little critical thinking here:

1. The NCAA expanded the assistant coaching numbers from three to five. That means every school can now have two more assistant coaches on staff.

2. Before the season, Tim Anderson demanded a pay raise to be compensated at Orlando Antigua levels. Josh Whitman, who handles the purse strings, not Brad, said no. Anderson took his ball (and apparently his entire salary, somehow) and went home.

3. It stands to reason that, if Josh wasn’t willing to up Anderson’s salary, then there wasn’t that much money in the budget to hire two Anderson-level assistants for the two new roles. Brad was told how much money there was and hired Tyler and Hamer - the level of coach he could reasonably get for that amount.

4. Now, whether Tyler and/or Hamer are qualified for such positions is a reasonable question to ask. Last year Illinois had the #1/#2 offense in the nation, going back and forth with UConn. Surely Tyler — nepotism aside — did something right with his offensive analysis. Admittedly, the last two years our defense has not been great, especially the interior. Perhaps Hamer and his system is flawed. Perhaps Brad is insistent on drop coverage and denying threes to the detriment of giving up easy twos. Likely, it’s a combination of both. Reviewing Tyler and Hamer’s job status at the end of the season are reasonable objectives.

5. This season, Illinois has prominently played three freshmen and one sophomore who is essentially a freshman. What is more likely… That one of the B1G’s top two winningest coaches the last five years has shunned reasonable coaching suggestions in a villainesque my-way-or-the-highway ego-driven crusade, or that freshmen are simply playing like freshmen. Occam’s Razor would suggest it’s the latter.
 
#187      
Year in and year out … They don’t … This year they spent more money on their roster than we did …

Based off what I’ve been told … Now everyone inflates their NIL a little bit including people here but at worst it’s within spitting distance …
Thanks @Indy Illini Fan and @mattcoldagelli , soon as I posted that I noticed there were seven more pages of posts and realized this had probably been addressed (numerous times).

I in fact did work all morning, but the lunch break is for the Illini...

1740422433145.png
 
#188      
Duly noted. And that stance is, perhaps, valid. It just lessens your argument when you crouch it in middle school level mocking of his clothes.
Have you seen the leggings in the picture provided? At least hike them up for Pete's sake. :LOL:
 
#189      
Is Illinois or Indiana the better job at this point? How many jobs are better than Illinois in the Big Ten?
 
#190      
We got a #1 seed... and lost in the second round to Loyola Chicago, which had a far lower talent level than we did.

And I don't buy the "Loyola was under seeded" nonsense. We were a 1 seed. In theory, that means the only under seeded team we shouldn't still beat more often than not is one that got like a 2 or 3 but deserved a 1.

We got beat handily by a team that was worse than us considerably on paper but out-schemed us.
I agree that was an absolutely awful loss and should not have happened, but I also think you may be overstating the case a bit here. According to Kenpom we were #4 in the country, and Loyola was #10.

Another way to think of that season is we played a whopping 5 games against top 10 KenPom teams (including the eventual champions) and went 3-2 in those games. I don't think that's a bad record against the absolute best in the country, but I think an outsized amount of attention gets heaped on one out of five of those games (for understandable reasons). The fact that one of the two we lost was in the 2nd round of the tournament is pretty bad luck. The fact that we had to face a team so good in the 2nd round of the tournament is also bad luck, and some negligent seeding from the selection committee. Yes, the loss against Loyola is absolutely a point against BU's tenure, but I still think that season was largely a success, and I think it's a shame so many people's memory of a pretty special season gets boiled down to one game.
 
#191      
Tyler Underwood averaged 2.3 minutes his senior year here. That's not how you correctly spell nepotism.
 
#192      
Let’s do a little critical thinking here:

1. The NCAA expanded the assistant coaching numbers from three to five. That means every school can now have two more assistant coaches on staff.

2. Before the season, Tim Anderson demanded a pay raise to be compensated at Orlando Antigua levels. Josh Whitman, who handles the purse strings, not Brad, said no. Anderson took his ball (and apparently his entire salary, somehow) and went home.

3. It stands to reason that, if Josh wasn’t willing to up Anderson’s salary, then there wasn’t that much money in the budget to hire two Anderson-level assistants for the two new roles. Brad was told how much money there was and hired Tyler and Hamer - the level of coach he could reasonably get for that amount.

4. Now, whether Tyler and/or Hamer are qualified for such positions is a reasonable question to ask. Last year Illinois had the #1/#2 offense in the nation, going back and forth with UConn. Surely Tyler — nepotism aside — did something right with his offensive analysis. Admittedly, the last two years our defense has not been great, especially the interior. Perhaps Hamer and his system is flawed. Perhaps Brad is insistent on drop coverage and denying threes to the detriment of giving up easy twos. Likely, it’s a combination of both. Reviewing Tyler and Hamer’s job status at the end of the season are reasonable objectives.

5. This season, Illinois has prominently played three freshmen and one sophomore who is essentially a freshman. What is more likely… That one of the B1G’s top two winningest coaches the last five years has shunned reasonable coaching suggestions in a villainesque my-way-or-the-highway ego-driven crusade, or that freshmen are simply playing like freshmen. Occam’s Razor would suggest it’s the latter.
Except Hamer was promoted in July 2023. Not necessarily buying that narrative. The idea that there was such limited resources that he had to hire his own son as an assistant is also crazy. Too hard for me to buy this argument that nepotism is fine, since the resources were too tight to get someone else.
 
#193      
@Indy Illini Fan I’m a bit confused—Kansas State seems to have more NIL money than us, and they can throw more at Underwood. So how do we have the resources to pay big-time assistant coaches and keep OA at almost a million? If K-State’s NIL is better than ours, how bad is ours really? It feels like sometimes our NIL is huge, and other times it’s not. Does anyone know where we actually rank within the Big Ten and nationally?
 
#195      
Wow, a bad couple games with sick freshman and we are wanting to blow up what took 5+ years to build. It reminds me of when the Cubs blew up their front office once they won (I'm a Cardinal fan). We need to relax, finish the season and learn. I want Brad to stay personally.

Just Relax Chill Out GIF
Thank you. People need to believe in the simplistic narrative that if Brad was just smart like all of us fans and stopped his team from shooting 3’s, we would be national champions. Apparently Brad doesn’t see what we fans see.

I guess it’s good that fans are so passionate. But I do wish they were not so reactionary.
 
#196      
Let’s do a little critical thinking here:

1. The NCAA expanded the assistant coaching numbers from three to five. That means every school can now have two more assistant coaches on staff.

2. Before the season, Tim Anderson demanded a pay raise to be compensated at Orlando Antigua levels. Josh Whitman, who handles the purse strings, not Brad, said no. Anderson took his ball (and apparently his entire salary, somehow) and went home.

3. It stands to reason that, if Josh wasn’t willing to up Anderson’s salary, then there wasn’t that much money in the budget to hire two Anderson-level assistants for the two new roles. Brad was told how much money there was and hired Tyler and Hamer - the level of coach he could reasonably get for that amount.

4. Now, whether Tyler and/or Hamer are qualified for such positions is a reasonable question to ask. Last year Illinois had the #1/#2 offense in the nation, going back and forth with UConn. Surely Tyler — nepotism aside — did something right with his offensive analysis. Admittedly, the last two years our defense has not been great, especially the interior. Perhaps Hamer and his system is flawed. Perhaps Brad is insistent on drop coverage and denying threes to the detriment of giving up easy twos. Likely, it’s a combination of both. Reviewing Tyler and Hamer’s job status at the end of the season are reasonable objectives.

5. This season, Illinois has prominently played three freshmen and one sophomore who is essentially a freshman. What is more likely… That one of the B1G’s top two winningest coaches the last five years has shunned reasonable coaching suggestions in a villainesque my-way-or-the-highway ego-driven crusade, or that freshmen are simply playing like freshmen. Occam’s Razor would suggest it’s the latter.
1-3: sounds like we agree so far, I posted basically the same yesterday:
1740422912301.png

Now Indy has stated that we do and did have enough money to pay 5 fully qualified assistants, each of us can believe that or not based on our own personal level of admiration for Hamer's legwear and comments on same.

4: seems like a matter of opinion, but I give TSJ the majority of the credit for last year. I do agree that the great stretch we played while he was out weakens my argument, but there I feel was a classic example of 'us vs them' mentality working. Credit where credit's due to the staff and players during that time though.

5: I'm not painting a Snidely Whiplash mustache on Brad here. The freshman point is valid, at least for MJ and WR (I think less so for KJ and TI who played in Euro leagues). I'm saying he's probably guilty of having tunnel vision (tunnel hearing?) when Tyler speaks. And we know at least one other, much more qualified coach, left over scheming (as well as players being recruited over). Last point, if you don't think Brad has a massive ego, one big enough to affect his judgement, I don't know how to prove that further.
 
#198      
I've been a BU skeptic for a long time. It's gotten me on more than a couple ignore lists I believe.

Partly this is just a reflex to living through BAM and JFG. I'm never going to accept that level of cult like following.

However, I've also been a skeptic about a change. Before this season the only coach for whom I'd have canned BU if I had,a guarantee was Oats. Every other coach in my mind was a risk. My list is a bit longer, but not much.

Our best long term path to success is to have the 60 year old BU make some changes, recruit well, and hope for a more than occasional glory year. He appears to bristle at opposition and runs off both coaches and players who don't think as he does. That needs to go.

Like Gritty, I'm chuckling at the pitchforks. In fairness, I'm not sure how many of the people pining for his exit were lighting candles in his honor acyear ago. But it sure seems as if sentiment has changed dramatically.
 
#200      
No competitiveness, the scheme/coaching hasn't seemed to suit the players either.... we just haven't even belonged on the court. Looked like a 16 seed the other night.

The overall collapse was truly epic. It’s hard to look that bad in all phases of the game all in one night.

There was one Illini player on the floor who didn’t quit. If you watched the game you should know who that was. Even when the game was hopelessly out of reach he continued to play with heart.

If that had been the last game of the season... the fallout from that debacle would be earthshaking right now. But the fact that two tournaments still remain leaves room for some redemption.

It’s the ‘not caring’ that seems the most troubling. Except for that one Illini... no one seemed to care about the embarrassment taking place. Where was the fight in these guys? Where was the team Alpha (still missing) to kick some rears to get them to show some life? What was being said in the huddle – and NOT being said that should have?

The best of the Blue Bloods never look like the Illini did on that sad New York City night.

There’s no embarrassment to losing a game. But there’s plenty of that in the way the Illini looked from beginning to end. The Illini looked like a collection of individuals without collective purpose or direction -- all looking for the Exit sign.

And if it’s time for a change... let’s hope a Bulls-style Phil Jackson-program elevating-person is out there somewhere – even if it’s a surprise name that no one is thinking about right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back