Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#251      
I was there.

One bit of color from that game: at the under-8 TV timeout in the first half, the score was 13-6 Penn State. It was a veritable offensive explosion from there.

We also did not shoot a single free throw in that game.

That was Weber's best post-Dee team.
I lived through the "glory" Weber years (went to UIUC from '05-'10). Why do you all have to trigger my PTSD with flashbacks to these games and this era...

Am Fine Omaha Boys GIF
 
#252      
...Illinois got a TON of good shots during games, both at the rim and for 3s. They just missed the 3s and many layups. That and turning the ball over on routine plays are the only things that held the offense back. I would be curious to see some stats/charts but yhe shot profile of the team changed a lot as the year went on. Early on the 3s they were taking were sometimes just a simple swing pass with the defender right there and as the year went on we saw a lot more kick outs for open looks. Really overall the offense got more complex as the season progressed which makes sense considering you can't do much with a brand new team right away while they still learn the basics. One of the other major ways that not having returners hurts.
fify
 
#256      
That's a bummer, he's a terrible basketball coach who was showing great promise as a studio analyst.
I also liked him in the studio. Had the right mix of personality and analysis. Kind of a bummer from a viewing perspective as I'm sure we'll get some novice to replace Pastner on the ESPN and Peacock broadcasts now.
 
#257      
I think those 3 could start, not only for Illinois, but for any team in the country

Just an aside but whoa... Loyer is most certainly not only a spot up shooter, where on Earth are you getting that from? Half his attempts are inside the arc and his FT attempt rate is double that of Braden's. It was only a couple weeks ago he was killing us with side step mid-range shots, ducking and dodging guys for lay-ins and shooting 8 FTs against us as he carved through people and drew contact. So now I am forced to ask if you have watched Purdue play?
Yeah I've watched Purdue play. Loyer could absolutely not start for every team in the country. He wouldn't even get on the court for Duke.

Anyone can score in the mid range against the Illini when Illinois defenders often end up behind everyone.

Loyer is soft and can't handle strength or athleticism. Good defensive teams can take him out of the game. The same can't be said for Smith or TKR.
 
#258      
Yeah I've watched Purdue play. Loyer could absolutely not start for every team in the country. He wouldn't even get on the court for Duke.

Anyone can score in the mid range against the Illini when Illinois defenders often end up behind everyone.

Loyer is soft and can't handle strength or athleticism. Good defensive teams can take him out of the game. The same can't be said for Smith or TKR.

I mean he does the same exact thing to every other team they play. He basically scored his season average against us.

This is getting too far off-topic, probably. Lets agree to disagree!
 
Last edited:
#259      
Well, not really…in this case…and in Tyler’s defense..we didn’t have anyone near as proficient at it as Domask was the previous year. You’ve gotta build your offense around the strengths of your personnel, right?

Totally agree, I was just under the impression that we went into last offseason with our new offensive scheme already planned and brought in guys that were supposed to fit the 3-point spam offense. Unfortunately some of those missed evals really hurt.
 
#260      
Totally agree, I was just under the impression that we went into last offseason with our new offensive scheme already planned and brought in guys that were supposed to fit the 3-point spam offense. Unfortunately some of those missed evals really hurt.
Humrichous going into the freezer and never really unthawing is a really underrated storyline for this season. 42%+ from 3 would have changed a lot about the team, imo.
 
#261      
I don't think that defense was great. Penn State just sucked
Ehhhhhhh, Penn State did suck, but hard to knock that defense either. That '09 team only allowed 0.88ppp and was considered the 4th best in the country. Only our '00 and '01 teams were statistically better on that side of the ball this century. Closest a Brad team has come to that mark was the 2021 Kofi, Ayo, Trent, Damonte team at 0.89ppp which needless to say was still outstanding.

This isn't advocating a return to those days, but our defense was a consistent Top 10 back then. Saying that defense wasn't good is fairly similar to saying our offense last year wasn't good in my opinion. Both were great
 
#262      
Yeah I've watched Purdue play. Loyer could absolutely not start for every team in the country. He wouldn't even get on the court for Duke.

Anyone can score in the mid range against the Illini when Illinois defenders often end up behind everyone.

Loyer is soft and can't handle strength or athleticism. Good defensive teams can take him out of the game. The same can't be said for Smith or TKR.
TBH the defense you mention against Loyer also worked well against Will Riley.
 
#263      
Humrichous going into the freezer and never really unthawing is a really underrated storyline for this season. 42%+ from 3 would have changed a lot about the team, imo.
Whoever brought Humrichous on board seems to have sold him as an elite shooter but at Evansville he was incredibly streaky, shooting pretty well in the first half of the season and then dropping off quite a bit in the second half probably due to better scouting. Poor evaluation and that’s coming from someone that defended him quite a bit this season on this board. I was never sold on him being more than a 15 minutes a game kind of guy but someone on the staff saw him in a completely different light.
 
#264      
I can tell you.....they just want to see hard hedges on ball screens lol

It's the best defense for controlling PNRs, but it's also the hardest to find a big that can do it. You need the optimal combination of size, length, and footwork. There's been one big at Illinois in the past 30 years who could do it (Augustine). Hawkins could also do it but was almost always asked to drop for rebounding reasons. Sampson does it the best because 5-6 of his rotation guys are springy, 6'8 wings that are positional-less.
 
#267      
Ehhhhhhh, Penn State did suck, but hard to knock that defense either. That '09 team only allowed 0.88ppp and was considered the 4th best in the country. Only our '00 and '01 teams were statistically better on that side of the ball this century. Closest a Brad team has come to that mark was the 2021 Kofi, Ayo, Trent, Damonte team at 0.89ppp which needless to say was still outstanding.

This isn't advocating a return to those days, but our defense was a consistent Top 10 back then. Saying that defense wasn't good is fairly similar to saying our offense last year wasn't good in my opinion. Both were great
A consistent top 10 defense?

The year before (2008) it was 29th and the year after (2010) was it was 49th. Our defenses were very good under Weber but they were not consistently top 10. More accurately would say top 25-30ish defense.
 
#268      
Thanks to all of you on here with lots on hands on experience, playing and coaching.
It really helps me, as merely a fan, with zero of that experience, to gain some perspective.

As an inexperienced observer, I would say our guys showed lots of skill, and generally played hard, with intensity, and never quit.
Since I bleed orange, I am very proud of that, and some of the immense victories we had this year.

Overall, our defense is clearly a bigger concern than our offense.
My memory isn't the best, but did we beat anyone by shutting them down with our D this year?
And when we ran into skilled teams that were bigger than us (Duke, MD), yikes!
As a side note that might be a tell, I didn't see us get many steals this year.

On offense, we may rate top-20 and average 84 points a game, and run complex sets that I can't recognize,
but I think our 2 games in the BTT are a curious indicator: 109-94 win over Iowa and 88-65 loss to Maryland.
In those 2 games only, we averaged 87 points a game, and "held" MD to 21 points under Iowa.
So if you're a stats guy, you can say good things, and these 2 games add to our season stats in a positive way.
But should they?
If you're an eyeball guy (like me), you wonder how the heck can Iowa score 94 on us (bad D),
and did we really only score 65 on MD (bad O, on top of bad D)?

Sorry for rambling. I will always be a fan and wish the players, coaches and us fans nothing but the best!
ILL !!
 
#270      
The biggest area in mind mind is having a gameplan specific to opposing teams to take away what they do well/rely on offensively. You saw this against us this year, take the Kentucky game- they don’t normally create a lot of turnovers or pressure/gamble defensively, but against us they saw an opportunity to hedge hard on the screens even double when it was one of the freshman with the ball to create turnovers

On the other hand we did nothing to take away their shooters we went over screens but with extreme drop coverage to take away Williams being able to dive to the rim but there was no defender on the screener so they would get wide open looks. For the majority of the year we had pretty terrible gameplan and then failed to adjust in game to what was beating us

That’s what we need most in a DC- have a philosophy it then adjust it to your opponent. When talent is equal like it was versus Kentucky coaching matters - All year we normally beat teams when the talent difference was high but lost to every team that had equal or better talent to us, that is not a good endorsement of our coaching
I agree with being multiple defensively but you also have to consider if your team can handle it.

Not just talking to you here, but does anybody feel comfortable with a 7 footer who is a foul prone cone on defense blitzing or hedging? Your best bet is to keep him between the ball and the basket where he can wall up and use his size as a detriment. I’m probably in the minority here but drop coverage with Tommy is absolutely the right coverage.

With Morez, sure he has the physical ability to play more aggressive coverages, but he is also foul prone. Do we want him picking up blocking fouls hard hedging or trapping 35 feet from the basket or do we want him on the court?

If you want to be multiple defensively, we gotta get more guys who move like Tre and Morez. Obviously we have to score too so those guys have to be skilled offensively. The problem is everyone is fighting for those guys and there aren’t enough to go around, so you build your system around what you have.
 
#271      
Mike Bibby hired as HC at Sac. St. AD making big commitment to athletic facilities. New football stadium and new basketball gym.
 
#272      
How about stressing the importance of not getting beat/and getting organized in transition? Maybe they could start there…?
I will meet you at transition defense is highly effort based. But it’s almost impossible when it’s off a turnover behind your 3 point line, and 3-4 offensive players are below the ft line for spacing.

It’s also a losing cause if you’re effort is great, but the other teams transition offense effort is great, AND they are more athletic than you, like Kentucky.
 
#274      
We can go back to scoring 33 for the game against PSU
That was such an ugly Wednesday night of basketball, that I had to spend 4 hours at Murphy's to get the bad taste out of my mouth. Still not sure how I made it into class on Thursday morning.

Edit: Box score shows 71 total points scored and 64 total rebounds in the game. Truly one of the worst games in my lifetime.
 
Last edited:
#275      
A consistent top 10 defense?

The year before (2008) it was 29th and the year after (2010) was it was 49th. Our defenses were very good under Weber but they were not consistently top 10. More accurately would say top 25-30ish defense.
2008-09 was really the one season in Weber's entire tenure where he had a team playing his basketball with his culture.

Not a lot of talent on that team, but they were gritty and hardworking and defended as a unit.

Now, remember, in that era of the Big Ten you could commit assault and battery without a whistle blowing, and you could also draw a charge if an athletic ballhandler so much as looked at the rim. It was reprehensible basketball to watch and thank heavens the sport has changed, but that team was a nightmare to play against under the rules at that time.

The year before was the Randle and Pruitt sulk-fest, and then the year after Chester and Trent Meacham were gone and Weber had begun his alienation campaign against his best player McCamey. It was never going to work here, Weber didn't want to work with the players Illinois needed in order to succeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back