The gif is Kenny Chesney.Don't follow country music. Thought it was Keith Urban. You can imagine where I went with that.
UCLA….Bob Chesney.
Last edited:
The gif is Kenny Chesney.Don't follow country music. Thought it was Keith Urban. You can imagine where I went with that.
I have a suspicion PSU is setting themselves up to be the next Nebraska (tho they are closer to high level success). A great program who decides title or bust. 9 or 10 wins a year isn't enough. Eventually that can lead to declining results if the next guy doesn't measure up. Go thru that cycle two hires in a row & boom, you have mediocrity.Great hire by VT. PSU will regret getting rid of him
And one could argue USC is ahead of them historically.
Also argument to be made for Oregon.There is no argument. USC is ahead of them historically.
Honestly, that would have been infinitely more entertaining to witness.Don't follow country music. Thought it was Keith Urban. You can imagine where I went with that.
The real question is will you being orange?Yeah. I’m delighted. Am heading over there to see Miami likely crush them on Saturday. The Hokie faithful will be stoked. Men’s basketball also looks dramatically better this season so am looking forward to seeing Chester and Amani in person.
There is no argument. USC is ahead of them historically.
Oh, yeah. USC far outstrips PSU historically. PSU was decent but nothing much until Paterno showed up in the mid-'60s. He quickly put them on the map and they were in the top tier consistently until they began to tail off in the late '90s.Also argument to be made for Oregon.
onwardstate.com
Is there?Also argument to be made for Oregon.
I almost included them in the original post. They are still kind of "new" to the high levels of the sport. They really weren't a power til the last 15 or so years. They are started to build toward that in the mid/late 90's & really hit it big pretty consistently when Chip Kelly got there. Prior to say the mid 90's they were a fairly non descript program. Some good teams but not really in the upper echelon of the sport.Also argument to be made for Oregon.
USC really benefits from the move to the Big Ten IMO. Their "profile" was fading as the mid 2000's glory years are 20 years in the past. The PAC 12 was fading into obscurity on a national scale. Moving to the Big has put them back in the spotlight for more than the annual matchup with Notre Dame. They've been in a prime national game for at least 3 games so far this year. @ IL, vs Michigan & @ND. With the Oregon game to come.There is no argument. USC is ahead of them historically.
I'm always being orangeThe real question is will you being orange?

I think time frame really matters here. A third of the people alive during PSUs last championship are no longer with usIs there?
National Champships: Penn St - 4; Oregon - 0
Weeks ranked in AP poll: Penn St. - 717; Oregon - 396
Weeks at #1: Penn St. - 21; Oregon - 16
All time Bowl Wins: Penn St. - 31; Oregon - 16
Total Wins: Penn St. - 925 (#3 all time); Oregon - 650 (#36)
Total Losses: Penn St - 410; Oregon - 470
Winning %: Penn St. - .688; Oregon - .577
I think you can absolutely make the argument that Oregon is the better place to be right now. But historically, Penn St. has absolutely accomplished more than Oregon, who was not really a notable program until the early 2000s (the 2000 season was their first 10-win season and first top-10 AP finish since the 1940s).
Sure, but doesn't the word "history" or "historically" typically involve a long time frame?I think time frame really matters here. A third of the people alive during PSUs last championship are no longer with us
Don't think it's coincidenceI almost included them in the original post. They are still kind of "new" to the high levels of the sport. They really weren't a power til the last 15 or so years. They are started to build toward that in the mid/late 90's & really hit it big pretty consistently when Chip Kelly got there. Prior to say the mid 90's they were a fairly non descript program. Some good teams but not really in the upper echelon of the sport.
I'd argue washington has a better history than oregon.Sure, but doesn't the word "history" or "historically" typically involve a long time frame?
If the original post had been about "recent history" I'd go with Oregon. But that wasn't how it was framed.
I'm amazed that the older I get, the further back the "history" of college football extends. When I was in college, it only extended back around 25 years. Now it goes back at least 65-75 or so. Funny how that worksSure, but doesn't the word "history" or "historically" typically involve a long time frame?
If the original post had been about "recent history" I'd go with Oregon. But that wasn't how it was framed.
If you're an Illinois fan, you're doing an injustice to your team if you don’t go back to at least Bob Zuppke.I'm amazed that the older I get, the further back the "history" of college football extends. When I was in college, it only extended back around 25 years. Now it goes back at least 65-75 or so. Funny how that works![]()
Agreed. I have a story about that. My surrogate grandfather a couple doors down from my childhood home in Ohio (my own grandfather lived out east), remarking when I told him I was hoping to go to Illinois, said I'd be walking on the hallowed ground of Bob Zuppke. I had no idea who he was talking about. In September 1983 the only thing I knew about Illinois football is that during my childhood it had been mediocre to poor and had only in the prior couple seasons begun to experience success.If you're an Illinois fan, you're doing an injustice to your team if you don’t go back to at least Bob Zuppke.
I remember stumbling across the Zuppke and Huff gravestones as a freshman and thinking the same thing.Agreed. I have a story about that. My surrogate grandfather a couple doors down from my childhood home in Ohio (my own grandfather lived out east), remarking when I told him I was hoping to go to Illinois, said I'd be walking on the hallowed ground of Bob Zuppke. I had no idea who he was talking about. In September 1983 the only thing I knew about Illinois football is that during my childhood it had been mediocre to poor and had only in the prior couple seasons begun to experience success.
Then I visited campus, walked into Memorial Stadium, took one look at the large granite block nested in the wall behind the NEZ bleachers, and thought "I need to look this guy up."