Coaching Carousel (Football)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      
Penn State looks like a disaster right now. You'd think after being one of the first to let their coach go, they'd have someone lined up. They probably just assumed Cig would bolt Indiana for Happy Valley.
they have definately been turned down by more than a few guys

why not throw 15-16 million per year for 5 years at Urban Meyer ?
 
#52      
Penn State looks like a disaster right now. You'd think after being one of the first to let their coach go, they'd have someone lined up. They probably just assumed Cig would bolt Indiana for Happy Valley.
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch. Maybe it's a delayed slide off into obscurity after the Sandusky scandal. And they may have accelerated it by pulling the trigger so quick on Franklin.
 
#53      
With the scuttle about Mizzou in hot in pursuit of Hankins and Eberhard I could not agree more that if we're gonna cut ties has to be after the ink is dry for all the early signees.
 
#55      
for miller my pain points are as follows:

1. the best players on last year's offensive line were the transfer tackles who had been with miller the least amount of time
2. we had the same exact players in our starting rotation this year as last year and they were worse
3. recruiting and development of prep players the way we all thought would happen under bielema has been...not great. most of those players we thought would make impacts as redshirt juniors are gone.
I would argue that the transfers got worse from year 1 --> year 2 under Bart Miller.


Bart Miller on staff is accepting mediocrity at a position coach that should be at a premium.
 
#56      
Saw somewhere that Stoops buyout has no offset. So unless Stoops and Kentucky negotiate some sort of offset (and I do not see that happening given Stoops’ comments), Illinois may be able to get him for a low as you can get someone of his caliber. I’d imagine it’s a matter of “what’s the lowest offer you’d be willing to accept given you’re still getting 36M from your former employer?”
Funny I always think of that offset as an incentive for coaches to take lesser employment to screw over their previous school.

Now he gets every $ he earns..
 
#57      
Penn State looks like a disaster right now. You'd think after being one of the first to let their coach go, they'd have someone lined up. They probably just assumed Cig would bolt Indiana for Happy Valley.
There is a perverse pride activated in some donors by making a move midseason, IMO ... shows how ~serious you are~ at your program about high standards. Turns out, it's 99% of the time a childish emotional reaction and not the best strategy, lol.
 
#58      
Penn State looks like a disaster right now. You'd think after being one of the first to let their coach go, they'd have someone lined up. They probably just assumed Cig would bolt Indiana for Happy Valley.
Well, if they'd done their homework and checked in with the real ball-knowers of Illinois Loyalty, they wouldn't have made that assumption.
 
#59      
PSU obviously is a great program historically with incredible resources if the right guy is in charge, but ... I have always liked that Illini Basketball isn't solely reliant on one "legend" for our historical success. Sure, Lou is a legend ... but John Groce is the only Illini coach in the last 50+ years to not win a Big Ten title, with 4 of the 6 in that time winning multiple Big Ten championships, 4 of the 6 earning a #1 seed, 4 of the 6 making at least one Elite Eight appearance and 2 of the 6 reaching a Final Four.

I feel like programs like Nebraska football, PSU football, Indiana basketball, Syracuse basketball, etc. who are SO reliant on one legendary coach who elevated them into the stratosphere during his tenure often then slide back down to Earth and have an identity crisis, lol. Some programs correctly leverage the legend to maintain elite status (e.g. Duke basketball), but man ... I think PSU is about to have their Nebraska football moment.
 
#60      
PSU obviously is a great program historically with incredible resources if the right guy is in charge, but ... I have always liked that Illini Basketball isn't solely reliant on one "legend" for our historical success. Sure, Lou is a legend ... but John Groce is the only Illini coach in the last 50+ years to not win a Big Ten title, with 4 of the 6 in that time winning multiple Big Ten championships, 4 of the 6 earning a #1 seed, 4 of the 6 making at least one Elite Eight appearance and 2 of the 6 reaching a Final Four.

I feel like programs like Nebraska football, PSU football, Indiana basketball, Syracuse basketball, etc. who are SO reliant on one legendary coach who elevated them into the stratosphere during his tenure often then slide back down to Earth and have an identity crisis, lol. Some programs correctly leverage the legend to maintain elite status (e.g. Duke basketball), but man ... I think PSU is about to have their Nebraska football moment.
I think they end up taking the interim and yes spend some time in the wilderness. Thank God we have Brett in these changing times.
 
Last edited:
#61      
Penn State looks like a disaster right now. You'd think after being one of the first to let their coach go, they'd have someone lined up. They probably just assumed Cig would bolt Indiana for Happy Valley.
Here's an article that tries to list/rank the best of the remaining options.


I can't imagine boosters had this in mind when they got Franklin fired. Apparently they are talking with Sitake. I still have a hard time believing he ends up leaving BYU, but that wouldn't be the worst hire. Not sure it's an upgrade over Franklin though.
 
#62      
Re Bart: I've watched Bart coach up close in practice, he's a great teacher and knows his stuff. We run a lot of zone stuff with guys who are power guys(Including Bart). You have to marry your recruiting to your scheme(which falls more on Barry and Bret imo than Bart).
I can buy this just bc of what we saw early in the year and then what we saw against USC. Looked like 2 totally different OLs.

OL going side to side or working in space = bad

OL going straight ahead and moving the LOS = good
 
#63      
I just have a gut feeling that Henry will be back, likely with some positional coach changes for appearances. If I’m wrong (not unheard of) Stoops would be a no-brainer but I’m sure he would have his pick at DC or go lower level HC
For some reason I tend to agree, Henry will be back for another year
 
#66      
Couldn’t agree more … Something has to give there … Not sure what it’ll be, but something …
So to me then you have to choose Lunney just because of how good he’s been (more often than not) with the offense this year and last.

IF Lunney gets poached, than maybe you go in a different direction with the offense. Do you pull Paul Chryst who’s more with BB/BM style? Would be very interesting to see the direction.
 
#67      
This is 50% hot take /50% contrarian take:


I'm more invested in a Bart Miller replacement than Aaron Henry
Glasses Why Dont We Have Both GIF by nounish ⌐◨-◨
 
#71      
I've always wondered if Barry and Bret are the best match. We hired Barry after we couldn't figure out his UTSA offense with a lot of motion and movement. That doesn't seem to work with Bret's idea of a ball control, smash mouth offense. I feel like Lunney has tried to find a mix of both styles and it hasn't always worked. That probably puts the OL coach in a bind as well. I figured Lunney would move on so he could run his schemes again elsewhere. Maybe I'm completely off here, but it just never seemed a good fit.
When you have NFL skilled guys on your roster like last year, the fit was great. When you have average skilled position guys, it's not that great. The scheme looks a lot better with Pat Bryant on the field as your "go to" and not Hank Beaty. Elzy was supposed to be "that guy", but he never developed.

Ultimately, the game falls on the guys playing it. The recruiting needs to be better. Ditto for the defense. The Defensive Line looks a lot better with Johnny Newton anchoring it. Life was a lot easier on Jacas.

Ultimately, the talent differential between us and the rest of the conference(good or bad), falls on Bret. That's just the life of a head coach and it's why they get paid the big bucks. Can't just throw the rest of the staff under the bus and not take accountability yourself.

That's why there won't be any significant changes to the staff. That's purely my opinion and I know many don't agree with it, which is fine.

I just don't see Bret taking the cowardly way out and pinning a team wide talent deficiency on 2 or 3 guys.
 
#72      
If Bret is going to make a move … It wouldn’t be until after the bowl game IMO …

Stoops is a name … Jimmy is a name … Can we get either ?

For Bret to even consider it … It’d have to be a guy that’s going to seriously elevate us …
10000% agree here. He's not going to make a termination move just to do it.

I'd hate for him to make that sort of move after the bowl game or signing day. That'd be a bush league thing to do to let this carry on for 4-6 weeks, have kids sign, then pull the rug out. That's a Lane Kiffin type move.

If Bret feels that Bart and Henry were completely lost in their abilities to do their jobs, they should have been fired yesterday. It gives them time to find new gigs and you don't mislead kids, then pull the rug out.

Part of cutting coaches is a potential exodus of current and future players. That just comes with the territory. If there's a huge upgrade out there, make it happen. If not, tighten the screws and let's focus on everybody, coaches includes, getting better.
 
#75      
When you have NFL skilled guys on your roster like last year, the fit was great. When you have average skilled position guys, it's not that great. The scheme looks a lot better with Pat Bryant on the field as your "go to" and not Hank Beaty. Elzy was supposed to be "that guy", but he never developed.

Ultimately, the game falls on the guys playing it. The recruiting needs to be better. Ditto for the defense. The Defensive Line looks a lot better with Johnny Newton anchoring it. Life was a lot easier on Jacas.

Ultimately, the talent differential between us and the rest of the conference(good or bad), falls on Bret. That's just the life of a head coach and it's why they get paid the big bucks. Can't just throw the rest of the staff under the bus and not take accountability yourself.

That's why there won't be any significant changes to the staff. That's purely my opinion and I know many don't agree with it, which is fine.

I just don't see Bret taking the cowardly way out and pinning a team wide talent deficiency on 2 or 3 guys.
I kind of agree in that the talent is clearly lacking on D this year. But even when we had talent (2023 for example with the law firm) we still looked like cow dung and played the same passive zone with minimal pressure up front we saw this year. It ain't just the talent that is lacking, IMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back