From bigcity - "Also, again you're mischaracterizing the discussion. You've essentially said 2 things: 1) good teams rely on P4 transfers, not G5"
Well use this year's 12 team college football field. Left out JMU and Tulane for obvious reasons.
Alabama (High School commits: 79.65%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 13.27%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 7.08%)
Oregon (High School commits: 77.88%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 12.39%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 9.73%)
Oklahoma (High School commits: 74.31, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 9.17%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 16.51%)
Ohio State (High School commits: 82.36, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 9.24%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 8.40%)
Indiana (High School commits: 65.09%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 11.32%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 23.58%)
Ole Miss (High School commits: 56.43%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 20.5%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 23.07%)
Miami (High School commits: 74.78%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 13.04%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 12.18%)
Texas Tech (High School commits: 60.88%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 29.26%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 9.86%)
Texas A&M (High School commits: 67.88%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 19.2%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 12.8%)
Georgia (High School commits: 81.4%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 10.2%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 8.5%)
So, on average (High School commits: 72%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 15%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 13%). Of that breakdown. The starters on those teams were heavily skewed towards commits and P4 transfer. About 85% of starting players on these teams came from those two categories. Meaning 87% of college football playoff rosters were P4 commits or transfers, and 85% of real production comes from this group. Non-P4 transfers accounted for 13% of total rosters in the college football playoffs, and about 15% of production (understanding that starting does not equal production, but gotta work today lol and cant do all that math).
Illinois Breakdown: (High School commits: 64.4%, Power 4 transfers (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC): 15.7%, Other transfers (G5/FCS/JUCO/D-II): 20.1%). Take that breakdown however you'd like to. But it shows that Illinois is comprised of non-P4 transfers at a much higher rate than the national average for high performing programs.
2) the transfer portal rankings are a reliable indicator of success.
I used the transfer portal team rankings for 2025 and then compared it to the ESPN Power Index. There is a strong correlation. Transfer Rank (1 = best) vs FPI Rank (1 = best). If we roughly compute the correlation. Correlation coefficient ≈ +0.45 to +0.55. This means a moderate, meaningful positive correlation. (you can check all this using AI if you'd like). But there is strong data that suggest doing well in the portal rankings has a positive indicator towards success. So i think they do matter and using single data points instead of larger models to look at this is silly"
I mean... if this isnt data, idk what is. the juiceman cometh