there are not many schools that move the meter for being worthwhile financially to add .Listening to this ^^^ podcast. How big of a deal would it be if the B1G could get BYU AND Notre Dame to come in together??? A nationwide audience of Mormons and Catholics!?!?! Crazy to think about. Don't think Utah, is quite right for the conference.
and while I mentioned BYU, them not playing on Sundays would necessitate changing the B1G tournament on the basketball side, which they will NOT do... so yeah, back to Notre Dame and who else? Miami/NC/GT perhaps? I don't realistically see the B1G adding anyone until ND is forced to give up their independent status. And that would require the B1G AND SEC teams to just flat out refuse to play them anymore, hint, not gonna happen! But if it DID, then we'd quickly go into negotiations with a few teams to be Notre Dames bridesmaid....there are not many schools that move the meter for being worthwhile financially to add .
Utah is not one of them .
Listening to this ^^^ podcast. How big of a deal would it be if the B1G could get BYU AND Notre Dame to come in together??? A nationwide audience of Mormons and Catholics!?!?! Crazy to think about. Don't think Utah, is quite right for the conference.
The most ecumenical college conference in the nation.Listening to this ^^^ podcast. How big of a deal would it be if the B1G could get BYU AND Notre Dame to come in together??? A nationwide audience of Mormons and Catholics!?!?! Crazy to think about. Don't think Utah, is quite right for the conference.
I still don't get the $20.5 million thing. Is that across the board? Does North Texas state get the same $ that UT does? Is the max for schools who have a full spectrum of athletics available? What about basketball only schools, do they get the same amount? I guess the schools decide who get what amount of $$$ and then NIL is entirely separate? Then what about 'certain schools' who can decide to pay student-athletes directly? Who makes that call on which schools can or cannot? Lots of areas to manage and be concerned about.
There is no longer any such thing as the Rose Bowl.
fyi...I sort of missed that this actually seems to be settled now. 40% split evenly among long time full members - 60% split by average TV ratings over that last 5 years. Seems like some incentive for ACC teams to schedule harder out of conference games (if FSU getting penalized for the weak ACC a coupe years ago wasn't enough already) and fight for the premium TV spots.Florida State, Clemson expected to settle with the ACC
That is A LOT of games for the "play in" teams. Would the conference championship be cancelled? Or, would the 1 vs 2 be locked in, so that neither would be subject to the play-in game. I would hate to lose the conference championship, drop to 3rd in the standings, have to play again, to get an 8 seed in the CFP and play 4 more games to win the title. If the 1 and 2 are locked in prior to the conference championship, then they all would be playing the same # of games.
Instead of raiding the Mountain West, the Pac-12 should have essentially merged with them. Basically, add the two Pac-12 schools to the Mountain West, give the new conference the Pac-12 name, and invite Gonzaga to join. Then the Pac-12 would not have missed out on UNLV, which is a better add than Texas St. or some of the other schools they added. AF is probably a decent brand to have too.
There is very little in college sports i found more gross than 5 MWC schools bailing on their conference to join up with 2 programs that were just bailed on by every other team in their conference.The fall of the PAC-12 should be a Harvard business case. Amazing how an entire storied conference with that much pull managed to overplay it's hand so badly it got destroyed.