The rich get richer.What is this ‘uneven distribution of revenue’ business?
What is this ‘uneven distribution of revenue’ business?
This is a terrible idea
The blue bloods don’t want this. It’s the poorer schools that do. And the only way to get them on board is with extra incentive (which still doesn’t seem to be enough to get Michigan & USC on board).Why are we for something that would further institutionalize the blue bloods advantage.
Many excellent comments. My favorite is “Not a capital deal. It’s a payday loan.”
If it passes, this might be our last year for season tickets. I’m just not interested in the direction things are headed. We’re selling the University’s name, colors, and traditions (institutional NIL ironically) to a Wild West pro league w/o even salary caps to keep things fair. Better to invest fan energy in the NFL than a rigged NCAA league where your team is fed to the lions.As I read the article, the "legacy programs" [ Ohio State, Penn State and Michigan ] would each receive as much as $190 mil while SC & Oregon's take would be $40-50 mill less. The remaining members would receive $100-110 mil. This where college athletics is. A lot of us dont like it, barely understand it. But, it's happening. That new south end zone /east Great Hall better be![]()
As I read the article, the "legacy programs" [ Ohio State, Penn State and Michigan ] would each receive as much as $190 mil while SC & Oregon's take would be $40-50 mill less. The remaining members would receive $100-110 mil. This where college athletics is. A lot of us dont like it, barely understand it. But, it's happening. That new south end zone /east Great Hall better be![]()
Josh Whitman thinks so as well.This will go well
Or he's right and you're wrong?As much as we appreciate JW (and don’t get me wrong, I think he’s the best AD in Illini history and probably currently at least in the big ten), the fact that he’s going along with this has to be considered a not insignificant blemish on his record.
Who knows what the real facts are, but if this is true, and revenues are skewed to any school over another, this is the beginning of the end of the conference. It will trigger and endless extortion of "give me what I want or I leave (and your TV ratings suffer)". JMHO.I missed that section too - and the media rights and other revenue payouts will be tiered too, with most of us getting 5% and OSU, Michigan and Penn State getting about 5.5%. There are some kind of tiers for high performing basketball teams (as long as football performs too).
Just seems like such a bad, bad idea and will make an uneven playing field worse. Such a shortsighted decision, and there is a reason pro sports have salary caps - this is not for the good of the sport.
It’s a twisted use of the term “legacy programs”, which one would expect to refer to the original Big Ten schools. “Anointed programs” is more accurate.As I read the article, the "legacy programs" [ Ohio State, Penn State and Michigan ] would each receive as much as $190 mil while SC & Oregon's take would be $40-50 mill less. The remaining members would receive $100-110 mil. This where college athletics is. A lot of us dont like it, barely understand it. But, it's happening. That new south end zone /east Great Hall better be![]()
No it's not. OSU already has a vastly larger budget than Illinois. OSU has 36? teams to support and Illinois has 21? Michigan 29?Who knows what the real facts are, but if this is true, and revenues are skewed to any school over another, this is the beginning of the end of the conference.