College Sports (Football)

#27      
I think this is a good move I would like to see a little larger expansion. Here is why

A. Now like college basketball I want a tough non conference schedule to prepare me. Yes you can play 3 cupcakes but that doesn’t help SOS. A 4 maybe 5 loss team can make it. (This will increase ratings)

B. Conferences are too large now so there isn’t really a conference champion with unbalanced schedules.

C. It stops penalizing teams who lost the conference championship game. Some years it was better to be 3rd place and know a team above you could drop

D If it was expanded more get rid of bowl games that players sit out for. Now the top players are more likely to play

This adds a week to the season and the most deserving team should win. There will be years like basketball the best doesn’t win it

One of my major concerns is a home game in December could be really cold but the NFL plays in cold climate outdoors.
 
#28      
Connelly wrote an article for ESPN a few weeks ago highlighting his concerns with the 24 team playoff (which btw, has anyone seen Connelly and @ChiefGritty in the same room?) and yes, he’s concerned with regular season tv ratings:


It’s hard to argue with him. If each regular season game has less impact on postseason play, less people are likely to tune into each game.
At the same time, teams will be obligated to schedule less cupcakes on their schedule. We are likely to see even more compelling early season non-conference games.

I am certain that the proposed expansion was one consideration for Illinois going out and scheduling ND.

I personally think the concern of regular season ratings dropping is grossly exaggerated. There will still be a lot of people gambling on the games, etc.
 
#29      

One ramification of this:

9-3 effectively becomes the new 6-6.
 
#30      
At the same time, teams will be obligated to schedule less cupcakes on their schedule. We are likely to see even more compelling early season non-conference games.

I am certain that the proposed expansion was one consideration for Illinois going out and scheduling ND.

I personally think the concern of regular season ratings dropping is grossly exaggerated. There will still be a lot of people gambling on the games, etc.
I don't necessarily agree this will be the outcome though. Why schedule more tough OOC games knowing you may lose, if you have a chance to lose 3 games in the conference schedule and could then be on the outside looking in with 4 losses? Might as well schedule cupcakes and get the easy wins.

You could be right on the question of ratings, I'm not sure I care much about the ratings of games like Texas - Ohio State, etc. even though I've been posting about it. Just thought it'd be a data point for why the networks may care.
 
Back