A name I liked last offseason was Vince Kehres. Parker coached with him at Toledo
I would assume someone on the current staff who knows the defense will take over for the rest of the season and Bret will hire a new staff the second this season ends.There's speculation that an interim will be chosen from the current staff. Another possibility is that there may be a highly qualified DC who is currently unemployed. Anyone have any ideas about who would fit that bill?
Unfortunely, Hauck favored the 3-3-3
My guess is Cooper or Bradford will call the defense for the remainder of the season. Then after the season Bret will make a new hire. Probably had to happens, I don’t think Bobby was truly Bret’s first choice when hired, I think someone went back on their word and forced Bret to pivot. Bret has known Bobby for awhile and I think Bobby thought he would be reinvigorated to coach again with just being able to focus on the defense now. Obviously I don’t think that was the case. Too many mistakes that can’t happen at this level, heck even at the high school level you don’t see a lot of this stuff. We will know more tomorrow at Bret’s presser though.440 is in the house. Your thoughts on the situation, how things will shake out going forward, etc..
Is it really ever this clean? My guess is that there were several F-bombs from the "discussion" not mentioned in these statements.
The defense would actually be worse with this lineup. This also isn’t madden it’s not to easy to change an entire scheme in a week
Almost certainly, they will.Do you think they'll stay in the 3-3-5?
YesDo you think they'll stay in the 3-3-5?
Retired happily in TucsonWhat's Hankwitz doing these days?
Smh...Bret forgot to ask Hauck if he would consider playing 9 on defense, due diligence on Brets part is lacking...Was that a 3-2-4 defense?
What sucks the most is how good the offense is. An Aaron Henry #45 ranked defense likely gets us to 8 wins this year. Now, I’d put the O/U at 5.5.
I see no problem with potential hires understanding it. Just look at defensive performance in those four games, culminating with a 9-person goal line stand. We don’t want to hire anyone who’d consider such results even remotely tolerable.I worry that this quick and early of a firing after 4 games may result in some serious negative recruiting and difficulties in hiring a new DC past this season.
Sure. I'm not sure how many snaps have seen us actually use three down linemen with backers stacked or ends wide. The problem is the personnel - we can't conjure more B1G-ready DTs from nowhere.Do you think they'll stay in the 3-3-5?
I get why Bielema was trying for the soft landing, but unfortunately sometimes you just have to be ruthless with personnel moves and do your best to deal with the human issues. I know looking back on times I’ve had to make personnel moves like this, the ones I regret are the ones where I waited too long hoping a situation would work itself out.lol
Coach B's insistence on having a soft landing for Henry factors in big time here. And the Seahawks D coach who changed his mind really put us in a bind
I see no problem with potential hires understanding it. Just look at defensive performance in those four games, culminating with a 9-person goal line stand. We don’t want to hire anyone who’d consider such results even remotely tolerable.
Fair. But without a scheme change / staff change, there wouldn’t be confusion on the field, miscommunication, etc. That alone’s worth 20 spots in the rankings.We don’t have the talent to have a #45 ranked defense. We lost Gabe, Rosiek, Miles Scott, James Thompson, Angelo McCollum, Tomiwa, Eli Coenen, Curt Neal, Hood..etc we literally replaced them with FCS back ups. Tomiwa is the #8 ranked dt by pff. We had a lot of talent on defense the last couple years.
Purdue, MSU and Maryland are games we need to win.
He might have made a mistake there. I truly believe that he sees still sees high potential in Henry as a schemer, coach, recruiter, or all of the above. We all think that he's overly optimistic about that, but it's not blind loyalty if he's setting him up as well as possible for his own purposes, such as a return or reunion.. or just avoiding coaching against him.Sometimes, you just have to do the hard thing. Bielema made a mistake there.
Fair. But without a scheme change / staff change, there wouldn’t be confusion on the field, miscommunication, etc. That alone’s worth 20 spots in the rankings.
Anyone worth a darn will realize it’s not the norm for Coach B. It would be concerning if this was his normal operating procedure with how he handled termination of coaches. The issue is with the hiring to begin with and not the timing of the termination.Man, I’ll be real, I don’t think there’s a positive way to spin this one. This isn’t even a “traditional” midseason firing, it’s early season. Not only is this difficult to recover from in the current season but I worry that this quick and early of a firing after 4 games may result in some serious negative recruiting and difficulties in hiring a new DC past this season.
Based on the low talent level of the DL and LB group, such little push and penetration I don’t think there’s really a good answer here. We knew offseason switching schemes without the talent or personnel would be a major issue and it would take time for the players to learn the new system and execute. And while we were clearly far more behind schedule than expected, I do think we have been improving week to week, just our starting point was so low and we have to sell out so much to stop the run, it still looks terrible.
So overall I don’t love the timing of this firing at all even if the poor play of the defense, the communication issues, and the clear lack of player understanding of the defensive scheme and playbook, supports letting him go. I think this is an absolute mess and I pray that this is only going to be 1 season of suffering that we can somehow still eke out 6 wins and not a death blow to our program momentum.
Really shocked by the timing of this.