Hansberry...hands down.Regardless of the way they left or the bad feelings we might have in a vacuum Clark, White, and Miller at least would add on the court value for this current team.
Plus, some of the players moved to lower-level teams where they match up against lower-level opponent defenders (shorter, weaker, ...). I'm happy for them that their 3-pt shooting improved, but I am not surprised.It would make sense to me that any player who works on his skills as a shooter would improve efficiency year over year. Thus, it makes sense that any shooter who works on his game after leaving Illinois would shoot at a higher percentage for threes or whatever shots he works on. It is not strange that those percentages climb when analyzing any group of players year over year.
Plus, some of the players moved to lower-level teams where they match up against lower-level opponent defenders (shorter, weaker, ...). I'm happy for them that their 3-pt shooting improved, but I am not surprised.
Welcome to the portal era. Most schools have this much churn more. I too miss the days of guys sticking around for 4 years but those days are over with a few small exceptions.TBH, I’d prefer guys stick around until graduation or the Draft, rather than the annual roster churn that has developed here under Brad.
I am taking the guy that wants to wear Orange and Blue every day. The rest can kiss my backside and never be mentioned againTre & Morez for Andrej and Mirk. Who you taking?
I would like to see someone do a survey of the top 50 college basketball schools....ask every scholarship player on these 50 teams to list the top 5 reasons why they are playing college hoops.....I think the answers and total tabulated results would be interestingI am taking the guy that wants to wear Orange and Blue every day. The rest can kiss my backside and never be mentioned again
I’m sure you mean in all of college basketball - it’s not Illinois specific. More than 2,000 Div. 1 players entered the portal in 2024.TBH, I’d prefer guys stick around until graduation or the Draft, rather than the annual roster churn that has developed here under Brad.
I would say IMHO that overwhelming the answer to that question would be to ply pro ball and earn a lot of money.I would like to see someone do a survey of the top 50 college basketball schools....ask every scholarship player on these 50 teams to list the top 5 reasons why they are playing college hoops.....I think the answers and total tabulated results would be interesting
Assuming 13 players per team, that is 650 players being surveyed. I think the results would look likeI would like to see someone do a survey of the top 50 college basketball schools....ask every scholarship player on these 50 teams to list the top 5 reasons why they are playing college hoops.....I think the answers and total tabulated results would be interesting
Yea...I agree....and probably close to "Obtain an Education".....would be playing for your dream school or Loyalty to a certain University or school.....$$$ have changed the landscape of college hoops foreverAssuming 13 players per team, that is 650 players being surveyed. I think the results would look like
Votes Reason
1 Obtain an education
649 Get drafted to the NBA
All these "ics" have dreamed all their lives of playing for Illinois. I heard that Underwood is going to honor kids who didn't quit mid-season the last home game. Senior night is no longer practical. /s-ishI am taking the guy that wants to wear Orange and Blue every day. The rest can kiss my backside and never be mentioned again
Not a Brad Underwood development. An NCAA basketball development.TBH, I’d prefer guys stick around until graduation or the Draft, rather than the annual roster churn that has developed here under Brad.
Assuming 13 players per team, that is 650 players being surveyed. I think the results would look like
Votes Reason
1 Obtain an education
649 Get drafted to the NBA
Other B1G Ten programs with stable coaching staffs (ex. Purdue, MSU, Northwestern) haven’t had anywhere close to the portal departures that Brad has had.Not a Brad Underwood development. An NCAA basketball development.
Other B1G Ten programs with stable coaching staffs (ex. Purdue, MSU, Northwestern) haven’t had anywhere close to the portal departures that Brad has had.
Since the unlimited, no-sit transfer rule came into effect four years ago, 20 Illinois players have left through the portal. That’s more than any B1G Ten program except Maryland (and more than teams that have had head coach changes). I don’t like it, and I think it’s a problem.
Barring a few exceptions.... if you're completely not using the portal, you're also likely not upgrading your talent pool. The secondary of our football team is a prime example of this. I've seen numerous posts over the past three months asserting "we should've gone after another corner."I’m somewhat torn on this… in general I hate the unlimited portal madness
But Northwestern wouldn’t really be a program I’d use as an example of a template we should follow, and the Michigan juggernaut’s top 5 minute getters are all portal additions
I have no doubt that continuity has a benefit. But more importantly MSU and Purdue are recruiting and portaling to their culture. I don't think we really have one.I’m somewhat torn on this… in general I hate the unlimited portal madness
But Northwestern wouldn’t really be a program I’d use as an example of a template we should follow, and the Michigan juggernaut’s top 5 minute getters are all portal additions
I have no doubt that continuity has a benefit. But more importantly MSU and Purdue are recruiting and portaling to their culture. I don't think we really have one.
How would this team fare in the B10 this year?:
1. Skyy Clark
2. Keaton Wagler
3. Tre White
4. David Mirkovic
5. Morez Johnson
Jayden Epps
Amani Hansberry
Carey Booth
Sencire Harris
DGL
I'd keep Tre and probably start him here over Andrej. He can score at all three levels, which Andrej isn't currently a threat to do.Probably undefeated National Champs if it weren’t for Keaton and Mirk holding them back![]()
The only exception to your statement is DGL. He deserved a bigger role elsewhere and my belief is he went elsewhere for a bigger role b/c he can take that on. He is showing that at UNLV, albeit, on a worse team. I could see him transferring to a higher major team again next year now that he has a bigger spotlight on him and proving that he is more than just a bit playerI am taking the guy that wants to wear Orange and Blue every day. The rest can kiss my backside and never be mentioned again