Gabe Jacas, J.C. Davis opt out of bowl game

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      
This would be unprecedented. A starting QB for a playoff team is considering opting out and transfer now.
Are you referring to John Mateer? Because if so, that was a fake post:


And if you're referring to Trinidad Chambliss, I haven't seen anything about him opting out, though there is speculation he may ultimately transfer to join Kiffin at LSU.
 
#77      
Whoops, forgot to include the link and now can't find it. I saw there's a chance that Chambliss is opting out.
 
#78      
Whoops, forgot to include the link and now can't find it. I saw there's a chance that Chambliss is opting out.
There's definitely speculation about him transferring (and it's just speculation at this point) if he gets another year of eligibility (which is not a guarantee) but I have seen nothing about him potentially opting out.


Hard to believe he would opt out with no guarantee he'd even have another year. I don't see anywhere where he's said anything to that effect, and they play in 4 days.
 
#79      
Whoops, forgot to include the link and now can't find it. I saw there's a chance that Chambliss is opting out.
I’d say there’s a 0% chance he opts out of playoffs. He would not only be vilified by his own fans, but by almost all college football fans. His teammates would despise him. NFL front offices would question his character. Transferring after the season is a completely different story.
 
#80      
What are you talking about? Gabe isn’t making “pro money”. He’s making money, sure, maybe $1m this year? The top edge rushers in the NFL make $40m-$50m per year.

You’d like Gabe to risk a hundred million in potential lifetime earnings to play in a single bowl game?
Life is a risk. I like risk takers.
 
#82      
For sure, for sure.

It’s super smart to make an investment (playing in the bowl game) that has little to no upside and unlimited downside.
Though I have no hard feelings about opt outs, I must confess that now that "player compensation" is technically legal with amounts more or less known, my attitude regarding the responsibilities of the "student athlete" and my opinions of assessing and supporting them have hardened somewhat.
 
#83      
Though I have no hard feelings about opt outs, I must confess that now that "player compensation" is technically legal with amounts more or less known, my attitude regarding the responsibilities of the "student athlete" and my opinions of assessing and supporting them have hardened somewhat.
Agreed. They’re not doing anything wrong, not violating agreements.

Going forward, compensation should be accompanied by contracts, allowing both parties to know what’s expected in return for the financial exchange. Compensation is not a gift, so be specific about the purchased services and terms. Then nobody is surprised or left wondering who will play to the end (define the end too).
 
#84      
Agreed. They’re not doing anything wrong, not violating agreements.

Going forward, compensation should be accompanied by contracts, allowing both parties to know what’s expected in return for the financial exchange. Compensation is not a gift, so be specific about the purchased services and terms. Then nobody is surprised or left wondering who will play to the end (define the end too).
This is already happening. In one of Bret’s latest interviews, he shared that he knew before the season started that both Gabe and JC would not play in a non-playoff post-season game. And Warner has mentioned that Luke is getting compensated specifically to play in the bowl game.
 
Last edited:
#85      
My sense of this is really simple, treat people with respect. That should work both ways. Most players are used to the risks of football, have accepted it their whole lives, and are excited about the opportunity for another game. It's a wonderful thing to watch, and are we not entertained? But...if a player is a superstar having a great season, their situation is a lot different. A high draft choice faces a monumental loss of future income for a bad injury. I believe CO had this issue last year with their stars and made sure they had insurance for the bowl game. Both played. That seems like a reasonable outcome that respects both sides.

At the start of the season, players don't know their draft stock. The season matters. You can't negotiate every potentials into an NIL deal. Don't believe me --try putting penalties on players for not playing, then watch how they play when they feel they got screwed. Teams wanting to draft them won't blame them either --they get the business side of football way better than college fans. We've seen guys opt out countless times and the NFL values them every bit as much, even more that they're healthy. You don't just pay your players, you keep them happy or you trade them.

Like everything else, programs hunting National championships will figure it out and pony up the cash where it's needed. I'm amazed at how the money keeps growing, but it seems every year it does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back