Indiana's RPI today is 135. In the eyes of the Committee, if the Illini lose today, does this count as a "bad loss"? Or is that a loss to a 200+ team?
I think they're an exception to the rule, and would expect their RPI to come up a bit over the conference slate as well. They have some really good wins, and some really :huh: losses, and RPI tends to throw a little more shade at the bad losses
Why is their rpi so low? Did I miss something?
The RPI the committee looks at is the RPI at the time of the game, correct? So, in theory, couldn't a team improve quite a bit in the course of the season in terms of RPI and still count as a "bad loss" on another team's resume? Or do they look at the RPI of the teams at the end of the season when considering that?
I think they're an exception to the rule, and would expect their RPI to come up a bit over the conference slate as well. They have some really good wins, and some really :huh: losses, and RPI tends to throw a little more shade at the bad losses
Currently:
IU's RPI is forecast to be 49 pre-btt.
UI's RPI is forecast to be 78 pre-btt.
IIRC, 67 is the lowest RPI for an at large (USC RPI 67 - 2011).
Syracuse had an rpi of 71 last year
There are special rules for Syracuse.
He was just correcting BlindLoyalty's "IIRC" (he'd said 67 was the highest at-large). Cuse was a bubble team, a lot of folks were surprised they made it, but nobody can really say Cuse didn't wind up justifying their selection