Peters is not great...but we don't help him much
Game Thread: Illinois at Michigan State
- Status
Deleted member 656517
D
Guest
They ruled it no targeting which would mean no foul. You can't just throw a late hit flag in there. That's non reviewable last time I checked. Perhaps I'm outdated lol
It was called a personal foul, targeting is a personal foul.
sbillini
- st petersburg, fl
Yes. But by adding the late hit, they defacto reviewed the play for a late hit. I didn't know that was reviewable either (adding a late hit call when none was called initially).
Somebody stated are LB'S had good depth in the recruiting thread. I can say with confidence it doesn't have depth.
Not quite. It was called a personal foul, targeting. They simply removed the targeting. They’ve been calling it like this since last season.
No, it’s called “Personal Foul-Targeting”. That’s the letter of the rule. Then the targeting is reviewable.
Deleted member 656517
D
Guest
I guess I just didn't didn't like the wording from the ref, and the outcome of the game. I'm just letting out fumes lol
I would not hold my breath.......
the national
- the Front Range
They just can’t throw on a foul when reviewing for another foul. That’s garbage. Late hits are not reviewable.
It was iffy but it’s not reviewable. The only reviewable portion of that play is whether or not the player is guilty of targeting and subject to dismissal. Luckily, they got that right.
Again, they didn’t. It was called a personal foul on the field.
We can’t get anything going north - south.
I'd be happy with 28-10
sbillini
- st petersburg, fl
Since this game isn't going anywhere, i'm gonna spend my time learning something. So are you saying they called two penalties on the play (late hit, targeting), and they reviewed and reversed the targeting? But since late hits are not reviewable, that stood as called? Or did they remove the targeting call and added the late hit during the review? It makes sense to me if it's the former, but just weird that they wouldn't initially call it both. If it's the latter (which is how i think many of us are interpreting it), that makes no sense.
We just can't pick up a blitz. Honestly, beating Wisconsin was a 1 in 100.
Navarro was defenseless there but in fairness it’s not like that defender threw a weak cross from the ground at the rear of a lineman who was stepping on his face.
I didn't realize Lewerkey was an All-American. 
Illini about to give up over 500 yards to offensive powerhouse, MSU!
Love Michigan States prison jumpsuits. Very classy.
Love Michigan States prison jumpsuits. Very classy.
Sorta. There’s only one penalty, a personal foul but the added measure the NCAA placed on these plays as a matter of player safety was the designation of targeting. The way it gets called is as “Personal Foul-Targeting”, which further subjects the player to potential dismissal from the game. The targeting I believe is an auto review but regardless of what that review reveals, it’s still a personal foul on the field.
Not sure why they don't throw every play...we don't get a rush so eventually someone will be open
the national
- the Front Range
The hit on Navarro, the defender led with his head. It wasn’t helmet to helmet. But isn’t leading with the head called targeting?
- Status