#753 Feb 1, 2026 Jon J Jon That was 10x more dangerous than the other hook and holds that have been reviewed. What's the intent of this rule???
That was 10x more dangerous than the other hook and holds that have been reviewed. What's the intent of this rule???
#754 Feb 1, 2026 LuckyIllini LuckyIllini Someone needs to do the same thing to Frager. Get him out of rhythm
#755 Feb 1, 2026 aaeismacgychel A aaeismacgychel That was one of the most dangerous hook and holds I've seen. That can straight up end someone's career
That was one of the most dangerous hook and holds I've seen. That can straight up end someone's career
#758 Feb 1, 2026 HailtotheChief H HailtotheChief Wtf did Z do? Keaton is fouled every play if thats a foul
#762 Feb 1, 2026 Second place is 1st loser S Second place is 1st loser Don't think anyone knows, where in lies the problem. It's like pass interference in football. It's a call for some, but not for others.
Don't think anyone knows, where in lies the problem. It's like pass interference in football. It's a call for some, but not for others.
#763 Feb 1, 2026 NASchamp Atlanta NASchamp I just don’t understand how they’re calling this game. Seems like it’s really one-sided lately.
#765 Feb 1, 2026 aaeismacgychel A aaeismacgychel This crew called the less than ticky tack hook and hold on Keaton against Iowa and they don’t call a blatant intentional flagrant. Incredible
This crew called the less than ticky tack hook and hold on Keaton against Iowa and they don’t call a blatant intentional flagrant. Incredible
#766 Feb 1, 2026 Champaign88 C Champaign88 lol, this game will be on a refs / Vegas scandal on a 30 for 30 at some point.
#770 Feb 1, 2026 punchabove33 P punchabove33 Bad play by Keaton to pass to Tomi who was already doubled.
#771 Feb 1, 2026 madillini4 Ozamataz Buckshank Millywaukee madillini4 not a “hook and hold”, but that’s still a flagrant. What a joke.