Here's some basketball economics. You should 71.4% from 2 (15-21) and 28.6% (2-7) from 3. Total of 17-28 (60.7%). What is so damn great about the 3 that we don't just keep hammering the 2 pointer? It would take us making 8 more threes to equal the 2 point output of the 1st half. At our shooting percentage that would be 8-28 from 3...AT THE HALF!We shot 61% from 2.
Unfortunately, FAU shot 50% (5-10) from 3.
Stats only show 1, so not sure. Gonna need his rebounding.Was Guerrier not in because of fouls......i must have missed that........Just heard we shot 64 % for the half......wow.......
We can win this game if we just keep on doing what we have done so far , minus the turnovers.......
Time for me to med up some ..........................Let's go illini.................
that drive by TSJ for the flush was DYNO-MITE !!!!!!!
Sorry, we shot 71.4% from 2 and 28.6% from 3, total 60.8% for the half. TypoHere's some basketball economics. You should 71.4% from 2 (15-21) and 28.6% (2-7) from 3. Total of 17-28 (60.7%). What is so damn great about the 3 that we don't just keep hammering the 2 pointer? It would take us making 8 more threes to equal the 2 point output of the 1st half. At our shooting percentage that would be 8-28 from 3...AT THE HALF!
Now, I as a player was adept to taking the 3, but I also shot almost 40% from 3 for my career. 8-20 from 3 at the half would be more efficient from an economic standpoint, or simple basketball IQ.
yep , his not being in skewer's the totals IMHO...............Stats only show 1, so not sure. Gonna need his rebounding.
From the first couple of minutes of the gamePlease pass to domask
50-49. Good guys49-42 FAU