Game Thread: Illinois vs Indiana

Status
Not open for further replies.
#352      

skyIdub

skyIdub
Winged Warrior
skyIdub
Yeah..intent is only a consideration for Flagrant 1>2 I think. A technical foul is just a tech. foul. Same if he would have slammed it off of the stanchion.
 
#354      

Chad Fleck

Chad Fleck
Eureka, IL
Chad Fleck
Get yourself a new map said:
Outscored 17-2 in final minute of first half over our last 6 games. Figure that out for god’s sake.
Click to expand...
Put that in a similar category as not winning tips. That's taken a turn for the better lately, maybe finishing the 1st half with a flurry will be next. 🤷‍♂️
 
#355      

zentrails

Z
zentrails
Illini2010-11 said:
Felt and looked like a terrible half for the Illini, but they still hold a 4 point lead at the half.
Click to expand...
Best thing to me was Dain. He was much better than he has been lately and we can really use him in spots in this game, IMO. Can't have Hawkins guarding their big guy all 2nd half, he's a load
 
#358      

EyeoftheIllini

EyeoftheIllini
EyeoftheIllini
Bleedorangeandblue44 said:
I have been having quite the love/hate relationship with Domask lately.
Click to expand...
Too funny. I was just thinking that.

With CoHawk having upped his overall play and, just as important. his consistency, seems most of my exclamations aimed at TV are Domask related. He has been great overall, but some times arrrrgggghhhh.
 
#364      

Illini in Indiana

I
Indiana
Illini in Indiana
Ok, I know TSJ is not "at game speed". To me this is the game to stay with him to get him back. I hope to see him play 15+ in the 2nd half. I see a surprise double/double comeback to spark the Illini 2nd wind of the season
 
#368      

zentrails

Z
zentrails
Illini2010-11 said:
When it comes after the half expired, it absolutely is. Every player on the court knew the time, except for Johnson??? Not buying it; he knew exactly what he was doing. Easy tech, IMO, and the refs obviously agreed.
Click to expand...
Yeah you toss it to the refs not to our guy's face
Hope this finally lights a fire under our team
 
#369      

JSpence

J
Evansville, IN
JSpence
skyIdub said:
Yeah..intent is only a consideration for Flagrant 1>2 I think. A technical foul is just a tech. foul. Same if he would have slammed it off of the stanchion.
Click to expand...
Ehh, I've seen and agreed with plenty of calls that needed to take into account body language. Losing/throwing balls is a big one.

Not that I know my rules well enough to disagree, and expect that you're correct. Just don't see it that way in practice.
 
#370      

Champaign88

C
Champaign88
Domask needs to be asked to do things that are to to his strengths. Ball handling is not his strength, has been ripped 6-8 times just bringing the ball up the court this year.
 
#371      

CDRUSN

CDRUSN
CDRUSN
Ball movement is so much better with TSJ out. The Illini tend to stand around to see what he will do. We will absolutely need to get TSJ back into the flow of Big Ten games in order to make a deep run in the tourney. Once TSJ is reintegrated seemlessly, we will be scary good again.
 
#372      

McGuppin

McGuppin
Chicago via Central IL
McGuppin
aaeismacgychel said:
Ty currently leading the team in pts, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and shooting percentage. All with 0 turnovers. Absolutely ridiculous half from him to carry a struggling team to a lead at the half. He was special. Really really special.
Click to expand...
Ty has become such an important guy, IMO. He plays tenacious defense and can really get to the basket and get you a bucket when you need one. Free throw shooting is much improved too, so you can have him in the game at crunch time. I think he's an all Big Ten type player by his senior year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.