They couldn't believe they overturned it. Said it was clearly a catch and figured it would be a quick review.I'm at the game, what did the TV crew say?
They couldn't believe they overturned it. Said it was clearly a catch and figured it would be a quick review.I'm at the game, what did the TV crew say?
WHAT?!?!?!?!??!?@ HOW IS THAT EFFING POSSIBLE?!?!??@!? HOW MANY STEPS DO YOU NEED?!?!??!?! THAT'S INSANE
They all thought it was a catch.I'm at the game, what did the TV crew say?
They’re shockedThey all thought it was a catch.
I want to be clear: I think that was a catch
I think they called it incomplete because the steps never oriented a football move. That is only way that is incomplete. Either way, it is a rough call to overturn.
Jeremiah Smith.Has IL gotten the benefit of a single close review this year?
They even brought in a rules analyst who thought it should have been ruled a catchThey all thought it was a catch.
We already have a POTD
They would have called us for targetingShould’ve challenged that catch with these idiotic refs. Does one head equal 2 feet?
Maybe they should use bigger than a 6 inch screen, and maybe require an IQ of over 85 for refsHAHAHAH- it looked like a catch, gets called a catch, announcers say it's a catch, everyone watches the replay- a clear catch, rules analyst- it was clearly a catch...
Officials- it was not a catch. Give a break! Only for Illinois AT HOME
I agree with you. I think there was a football move in there. That is the only way that the call could be overturned, by saying there was no football move. Therefore, not a good call.You mean the four steps that don't orient a "football move". Lmao. Ok.