I believe I was the one who started the discussion, the issue being whether or not the system is a contributing factor to rebounding performance.
Well, no. Not really. Here's the initial comment when the question was raised if our defense would be improved:
Having Thorne and Black back along with a more experienced Finke and an improved Mav means our defensive rebounding should be immensely improved. And that will also greatly improve our defense.
You then chimed in with this:
Yes it should be improved.
But last year's team was the worst rebounding Illinois team I can remember and I have been following the Illini for over 50 years. Imo, there was no excuse for it even with the injuries. I fear that Groce's scheme contributed to the disaster. I worry that he doesn't have the same conviction in the importance of rebounding that a Henson or Izzo or Ryan has/had.
Now I don't know of any coach who has a scheme to not rebound the ball on defense. On the other end, sure. Groce even admitted he tried that option, to not go after offensive boards in an effort to improve the transition defense. I don't think it's his normal tactics, but he was trying something different.
Regardless of that, it was about a different topic. Offensive rebounding is very different than defensive rebounding. By the way, the coach you referenced, Bo Ryan, frequently had his team de-emphasize offensive rebounding. It's the reason they rarely gave up many transition baskets.
I think a longer term view is helpful. That's my opinion. If you want to explain why you think you have the authority to limit the original question and further, why looking at a shorter period of time versus a longer period of time is better when discussing a system, I'd be interested to hear your reasoning.
Not sure I follow any of this. The "original" question was whether the defense would be improved. I think we're including all 4 years that Groce has coached here, so not sure on this shorter/longer period of time you're referencing?
I am wondering if Groce is making a tactical decision to emphasize field goal defense at the expense of rebounding. For example, it seems to me that Egwu spent more time defending perimeter shooters than most centers.
IMO, he's adjusting to his personnel. Egwu was not a good rebounder but was pretty mobile and a decent shot blocker. I suppose Groce could have kept him more in the paint, but I don't know that it would have helped the defense overall as Nnanna just didn't seem to have good rebounding instincts. And bad hands....
I think field goal defense is also critical to the success of the team. After all John Wooden named it as one of the three most important stats along with turnovers and rebounds.
If Groce is making that decision, I can respect that. It's his decision as head coach. I was wanting to discuss that... is he making that decision and is it a good one.
Thanks for clarifying. I think he had to try a lot of things last season given the challenges of many new players and so many injuries. Obviously they didn't work out too well as the defense was not good.
I'm not sure what you mean with "Well, we also don't have any evidence that he's been unsuccessful either." Seems to me all the evidence points to a problem. Last I heard Black was dealing with the law. I have no idea what your talking about.
It's pretty simple, Black hasn't played his second full season yet, so we can't judge the success/failure of his time here yet. You're looking for evidence that he's changed, but we can't possibly know that yet.
Well, now you're in high gear on your rant. You made a stink over a pet peeve, a minor annoyance by definition. You can own that.
Calling me names? Geesh!
Sensitive much? Hey, I hope I'm wrong about your wimpish nature...