Illini Basketball 2025-2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1      

Dan

Admin
Welcome to the Illini Basketball thread :illinois:


Illini Basketball 2025-2026 (28-8, 15-5)
DateOpponentResult
Mon, Nov 3Jackson StateW 113-55
Fri, Nov 7Florida Gulf CoastW 113-70
Tue, Nov 11Texas TechW 81-77
Fri, Nov 14ColgateW 84-65
Wed, Nov 19AlabamaL 86-90
Sat, Nov 22Long IslandW 98-58
Mon, Nov 24UT Rio Grande ValleyW 87-73
Fri, Nov 28UConnL 61-74
Sat, Dec 6TennesseeW 75-62
Tue, Dec 9at Ohio StateW 88-80
Sat, Dec 13NebraskaL 80-83
Mon, Dec 22MissouriW 91-48
Mon, Dec 29SouthernW 90-55
Sat, Jan 3at Penn StateW 73-65
Thu, Jan 8RutgersW 81-55
Sun, Jan 11at IowaW 75-69
Wed, Jan 14at NorthwesternW 79-68
Sat, Jan 17MinnesotaW 77-67
Wed, Jan 21MarylandW 89-70
Sat, Jan 24at PurdueW 88-82
Thu, Jan 29WashingtonW 75-66
Sun, Feb 1at NebraskaW 78-69
Wed, Feb 4NorthwesternW 84-44
Sat, Feb 7at Michigan StateL 82-85 OT
Tue, Feb 10WisconsinL 90-92 OT
Sun, Feb 15IndianaW 71-51
Wed, Feb 18at USCW 101-65
Sat, Feb 21at UCLAL 94-95 OT
Fri, Feb 27MichiganL 70-84
Tue, Mar 3OregonW 80-54
Sun, Mar 8at MarylandW 78-72
Fri, Mar 13WisconsinL 88-91 OT
Thu, Mar 19PennW 105-70
Sat, Mar 21VCUW 76-55
Thu, Mar 26HoustonW 65-55
Sat, Mar 28IowaW 71-59
Sat, Apr 4UConn5:09pm TBS

All times CT
 
Last edited:
#4      
Didn't realize... most regular season wins since 2006

E8 team was 23-8
Yeah, Brad's regular season record was pretty damn consistent after the rebuild, haha.

2020: 21-10
2021: 20-6 (shortened season)
2022: 22-8
2023: 20-11
2024: 23-8
2025: 20-11
2026: 24-7

All those teams got some big wins, too, so it really seems that the difference in those teams' seeds pretty much come down to (A) metrics and (B) their BTT performances. 2023 had such meh metrics and lost immediately in the BTT, so there is your #9 seed. By contrast, 2024 just chugged along, avoided any bad losses and won the BTT to lock up a #3 seed. And all the while the difference was 3 games in the regular season record-wise ... hardly huge!

I'm far from a "Only the Tournament Matters" kind of fan, but the 2024 team really showed what a postseason run can do for memorializing a season as special. At this time two years ago, they were in pretty much the same spot as our 2022 team except with no Big Ten championship banner to show for it ... and then they won 6 games in a row in the postseason, en route to a BTT championship and an Elite Eight appearance.

This team stands at a similar crossroads. We've undeniably had yet another very good regular season, even if there were hiccups. If we got hot and won the BTT and made another Elite Eight, this team would go down at least as fondly as the 2024 team in Illini lore. If we get bounced in the Second Round, we will (unfairly) fade into the crowd of teams like 2003 or 2006 that were really good but had wonderful regular seasons unfortunately cut short in a way that makes it difficult to get that bitter taste of the ending out of our mouths!

I'm back on the optimistic train. I think we'll see urgency Friday, and I'm preparing myself for our run. :cool:
 
#5      
Also, this seems like the appropriate place to post this. I was thinking more about some of the debates / conversations here where you have what seems like two groups of fans (both very broad and with a lot of variety within them), plus of course folks who wouldn't fall in either.

(1) Fans who are frustrated that this team really looked like it could be the one to finally cut down the nets for the Illini, and now they are feeling like this is more of a Sweet Sixteen team that can maybe make the Elite Eight. They'd still acknowledge that's a great season in the big picture, but they sort of feel the heartbreak of thinking we had a title contender and now being less sure.
(2) Fans who are frustrated that so many of our fans seem to have an almost delusional lack of appreciation for a season that could likely produce a frickin' #2 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Not only is that just an objectively great season by almost any metric and not only is it especially good compared to the pre-Underwood Era, but you also just flat-out DO give yourself a chance to fight to cut down the nets if you achieve a #2 seed ... the path really is that good if you take care of business!

I think both of these are totally reasonable in different ways, and I think it touches on a finer point about Illini basketball ... and that is there is just no way to avoid the reality that we must ALWAYS thread the needle with being appreciative of what we have accomplished while never losing the sense of urgency to remember that the ultimate goal here IS a National Championship. The latter is common sense when you are (arguably) the best program all-time to not win the National Championship, and you have put yourself in a position to achieve that goal several times in the modern era (1 National Runner-Up, 2 Final Fours, 4 times as a #1 seed, etc. in the last couple decades). Winning a National Championship here is just simply not a fool's dream ... it's something that's almost happened, and we keep reloading to at least be in the conversation. That will always be the ultimate goal until it happens. With that said, it's just asinine to expect every year to be our shot, even in the NIL / portal era. Sometimes, we do need to just appreciate a great season and not get down on a team of which we should be proud simply because we aren't confident we will LITERALLY be the one team that wins the NCAA Tournament. :ROFLMAO:

And I think the TL;DR compromise, at least for me, is this. I know we won't be a Final Four contender every year, and that is okay. I can still be proud and optimistic about the program IF one (admittedly vague) requirement is being met ... and that is no matter how an individual season might be going, I feel we are working toward that ultimate goal in a noticeable and positive way. If we go the next 10 years getting #4 and #5 seeds and we all know in our heart of hearts that those teams don't have a snowball's chance in hell of going on a Final Four run, that's an issue ... because the pieces clearly aren't there to regularly put ourselves in a position to eventually get lucky and win it all. However, if we are getting a top 3 seed in 3 of 5 years, as we have since 2021?! That is absolutely putting ourselves in a position to achieve that goal. Who knows what will happen with this group? If they regain the form they had during the winning streak and even pre-UCLA loss, the sky really is the limit ... if we play like we did at Maryland twice in the Tournament, we are getting bounced in the Second Round (and yes, that IS a disappointment as a #2 seed no matter how you cut it!). I am optimistic that the latter won't happen ... and I am unsure if the former will. Something in between can still give us a very good postseason, and all you can do in March Madness is hope that things fall our way!
 
#6      
My post-season wish list:
1. Team is relatively healthy by March 19th.
2. Keaton…Does he have some March madness magic in him?
3. Kylan…he was awesome in last year’s tournament. Do we see that again?
4. The Ivisic brothers to come out of their disgusting shooting slumps.
 
#7      
My post-season wish list:
1. Team is relatively healthy by March 19th.
2. Keaton…Does he have some March madness magic in him?
3. Kylan…he was awesome in last year’s tournament. Do we see that again?
4. The Ivisic brothers to come out of their disgusting shooting slumps.
If you can promise me all four of those wishes, I am willing to start dreaming again about meeting Michigan three times this year. Hint: They can't win all three.
 
#8      
He changed back the hair, no?

IMG_0471.jpeg
 
#9      
Robert posted the list of our final AP rank since 2007 to show just what a dramatic improvement the Underwood Era has been, and it gave me an idea to show the super depressing decline we suffered after Dee left. On the College Poll Archive site, you can pick a timeframe to see what teams spent the most time in the AP Poll during those years. Below is where we ranked nationally , with 2000 being held constant as the first year and going through each of the years below. You can see our status as a program literally erode, lol.

2006: #3, 118 weeks
2007: #5, 118 weeks
2008: #8, 118 weeks
2009: #11, 125 weeks
2010: #13, 128 weeks
2011: #12, 140 weeks
2012: #12, 144 weeks
2013: #13, 152 weeks
2014: #16, 153 weeks
2015: #17, 154 weeks
2016: #17, 154 weeks
2017: #18, 154 weeks
2018: #19, 154 weeks
2019: #22, 154 weeks

... and then starting with 2020...

2020: #28, 8 weeks
2021: #14, 25 weeks
2022: #11, 38 weeks
2023: #15, 45 weeks
2024: #9, 65 weeks
2025: #11, 75 weeks
2026: #10, 93 weeks

Amazing job by Coach Underwood and staff!! In the 2020-26 stretch, we will move past Auburn to be alone in 10th place when the next AP Poll is released. Among Big Ten teams, we are only behind Purdue (#7 at 102 weeks) and well ahead of the next teams of #15 Michigan State (76 weeks), #16 Wisconsin (70 weeks) and #21 Michigan (61 weeks).

As a fun extra bit of historical information, here are the top 5 Big Ten programs (at the time) by decade! I also included the current top 25 all-time at the bottom, plus the remaining non-top 25 Big Ten teams.

1950 - 1959
#3 Illinois, 89 weeks
#7 Indiana, 73 weeks
#25 Iowa, 41 weeks
#30 Michigan State, 34 weeks
#30 Minnesota, 34 weeks

1960 - 1969
#6 Ohio State, 66 weeks
#13 Michigan, 40 weeks
#14 Illinois, 38 weeks
#27 Indiana, 23 weeks
#33 Iowa, 18 weeks

1970 - 1979
#8 Indiana, 94 weeks
#12 Michigan, 76 weeks
#25 Minnesota, 44 weeks
#33 Ohio State, 31 weeks
#33 Purdue, 31 weeks

1980 - 1989
#5 Iowa, 114 weeks
#6 Indiana, 109 weeks
#11 Illinois, 93 weeks
#15 Michigan, 77 weeks
#18 Purdue, 68 weeks

1990 - 1999
#10 Indiana, 127 weeks
#11 Michigan, 117 weeks
#13 Purdue, 95 weeks
#17 Michigan State, 87 weeks
#19 Iowa, 81 weeks

2000 - 2009
#8 Michigan State, 136 weeks
#11 Illinois, 125 weeks
#19 Wisconsin, 96 weeks
#27 Indiana, 72 weeks
#30 Ohio State, 65 weeks

2010 - 2019
#5 Michigan State, 151 weeks
#10 Ohio State, 123 weeks
#11 Wisconsin, 121 weeks
#14 Purdue, 106 weeks
#18 Michigan, 93 weeks

2020 - Present
#7 Purdue, 102 weeks
#10 Illinois, 93 weeks
#15 Michigan State, 76 weeks
#16 Wisconsin, 70 weeks
#21 Michigan, 61 weeks

All-Time | 1949 to Present
#1 Kentucky, 997 weeks
#2 North Carolina, 980 weeks
#3 Duke, 932 weeks
#4 Kansas, 892 weeks
#5 UCLA, 748 weeks
#6 Louisville, 681 weeks
#7 Arizona, 636 weeks
#8 Indiana, 582 weeks
#9 Syracuse, 550 weeks
#10 Illinois, 538 weeks
#11 Michigan State, 527 weeks
#12 Purdue, 471 weeks
#13 Michigan, 469 weeks
#14 Ohio State, 448 weeks
#15 Maryland, 446 weeks
#16 Villanova, 443 weeks
#16 Cincinnati, 443 weeks
#18 UConn, 432 weeks
#19 Marquette, 431 weeks
#20 Georgetown, 397 weeks
#21 Oklahoma, 392 weeks
#22 Tennessee, 389 weeks
#22 Iowa, 389 weeks
#24 Alabama, 386 weeks
#25 Notre Dame, 378 weeks
...
#30 Wisconsin, 333 weeks
#43 Minnesota, 236 weeks
#50 USC, 207 weeks
#57 Oregon, 168 weeks
#60 Washington, 162 weeks
#108 Nebraska, 47 weeks
#110 Rutgers, 41 weeks
#123 Penn State, 25 weeks
#139 Northwestern, 18 weeks

I-L-L!
 
#12      
Also, this seems like the appropriate place to post this. I was thinking more about some of the debates / conversations here where you have what seems like two groups of fans (both very broad and with a lot of variety within them), plus of course folks who wouldn't fall in either.

(1) Fans who are frustrated that this team really looked like it could be the one to finally cut down the nets for the Illini, and now they are feeling like this is more of a Sweet Sixteen team that can maybe make the Elite Eight. They'd still acknowledge that's a great season in the big picture, but they sort of feel the heartbreak of thinking we had a title contender and now being less sure.
(2) Fans who are frustrated that so many of our fans seem to have an almost delusional lack of appreciation for a season that could likely produce a frickin' #2 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Not only is that just an objectively great season by almost any metric and not only is it especially good compared to the pre-Underwood Era, but you also just flat-out DO give yourself a chance to fight to cut down the nets if you achieve a #2 seed ... the path really is that good if you take care of business!

I think both of these are totally reasonable in different ways, and I think it touches on a finer point about Illini basketball ... and that is there is just no way to avoid the reality that we must ALWAYS thread the needle with being appreciative of what we have accomplished while never losing the sense of urgency to remember that the ultimate goal here IS a National Championship. The latter is common sense when you are (arguably) the best program all-time to not win the National Championship, and you have put yourself in a position to achieve that goal several times in the modern era (1 National Runner-Up, 2 Final Fours, 4 times as a #1 seed, etc. in the last couple decades). Winning a National Championship here is just simply not a fool's dream ... it's something that's almost happened, and we keep reloading to at least be in the conversation. That will always be the ultimate goal until it happens. With that said, it's just asinine to expect every year to be our shot, even in the NIL / portal era. Sometimes, we do need to just appreciate a great season and not get down on a team of which we should be proud simply because we aren't confident we will LITERALLY be the one team that wins the NCAA Tournament. :ROFLMAO:

And I think the TL;DR compromise, at least for me, is this. I know we won't be a Final Four contender every year, and that is okay. I can still be proud and optimistic about the program IF one (admittedly vague) requirement is being met ... and that is no matter how an individual season might be going, I feel we are working toward that ultimate goal in a noticeable and positive way. If we go the next 10 years getting #4 and #5 seeds and we all know in our heart of hearts that those teams don't have a snowball's chance in hell of going on a Final Four run, that's an issue ... because the pieces clearly aren't there to regularly put ourselves in a position to eventually get lucky and win it all. However, if we are getting a top 3 seed in 3 of 5 years, as we have since 2021?! That is absolutely putting ourselves in a position to achieve that goal. Who knows what will happen with this group? If they regain the form they had during the winning streak and even pre-UCLA loss, the sky really is the limit ... if we play like we did at Maryland twice in the Tournament, we are getting bounced in the Second Round (and yes, that IS a disappointment as a #2 seed no matter how you cut it!). I am optimistic that the latter won't happen ... and I am unsure if the former will. Something in between can still give us a very good postseason, and all you can do in March Madness is hope that things fall our way!
Yeah, this is the middle ground that I was attempting to talk about in the previous thread. It's ok to say a team had a great and memorable regularly season and also feel like it's a postseason failure to get bounced early. It doesn't need to be one way or the other. And it's also okay to have different expectations for each team.

For example, a fond Illinois memory for me was watching that super young '99 team, and watching them be a game away from winning the BTT as the 11 seed and the autobid into the tourney that comes with it. That team was 11-17 in the regular season and 3-13 in the B10! How could that possibly be considered a great season, right? Preposterous! And yet for me it was. I loved watching that team grow each game. Seeing them ooze all that potential and keep scratching and clawing their way closer closer to getting that elusive win as the worst team in the B10 and then finally watching them break through. They were a mesmerizing watch for me and I couldn't help but feel that team was going to be something special in the following years, and they were. Nobody expected that 99 team to be competitive and yet it truly was a great year in my opinion despite the losing record.

Meanwhile, I really had a hard time enjoying watching our 2023 team, and that was a tournament team. Expectations for that team was much higher, but the infighting, the drama, and their overall play was exhausting to me. Yes, they were 20-11 and yet I can conclusively say that 11-17 team from 1999 gave me far far far far more joy watching them and in my opinion had a far greater season.

So why? Why is this so? I do think a large part of it is indeed expectations. Being a plucky young underdog bubble team that plays their hardest and makes a shocking BTT and Sweet 16 run will bring a lot of reverence and hope for the future. Whereas if say the '05 team had that amazing regular season and then lost in the 1st or 2nd round to Fairleigh Dickinson or Nevada, that would've ripped all of our hearts out. It indeed would've ruined many of our happiest memories in thinking back on that team. And this year, Michigan's fanbase would be similarly devastated if they got sent home in the first weekend. For them expectations are Final Four (if not Natty) or bust, and I don't think they're wrong. When you're having that historically good a season, you're no longer happy with just regular season success, you want it all. I also think that teams tend to be judged on growth and finish more than how they start. Losing 7 of 9 to start a season then winning 20 of 22 looks a lot better than winning 20 of 22 then losing the next 7 of 9 despite it being the same record

So what should our expectations then be for this team? Well, if we were to play to seed as a 2/3 that means on average a S16 to E8 team. And eye test and team potential would say that losing in a 1stvor 2nd round would also seem like a major underperformance. It also seems like expecting a Natty with this group is similarly a major overperformance as a 1 seed seems more like a favorite for that. So I think going in with an expectation that this team should make a Sweet 16 isn't a bad or wrong or unfair expectation. That doesn't mean if we don't make it there this season was an abject failure but it's also not going to give a lot of us warm and fuzzy feelings and there will be feelings that the postseason was a failure.
 
#14      
Also, this seems like the appropriate place to post this. I was thinking more about some of the debates / conversations here where you have what seems like two groups of fans (both very broad and with a lot of variety within them), plus of course folks who wouldn't fall in either.

(1) Fans who are frustrated that this team really looked like it could be the one to finally cut down the nets for the Illini, and now they are feeling like this is more of a Sweet Sixteen team that can maybe make the Elite Eight. They'd still acknowledge that's a great season in the big picture, but they sort of feel the heartbreak of thinking we had a title contender and now being less sure.
(2) Fans who are frustrated that so many of our fans seem to have an almost delusional lack of appreciation for a season that could likely produce a frickin' #2 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Not only is that just an objectively great season by almost any metric and not only is it especially good compared to the pre-Underwood Era, but you also just flat-out DO give yourself a chance to fight to cut down the nets if you achieve a #2 seed ... the path really is that good if you take care of business!

I think both of these are totally reasonable in different ways, and I think it touches on a finer point about Illini basketball ... and that is there is just no way to avoid the reality that we must ALWAYS thread the needle with being appreciative of what we have accomplished while never losing the sense of urgency to remember that the ultimate goal here IS a National Championship. The latter is common sense when you are (arguably) the best program all-time to not win the National Championship, and you have put yourself in a position to achieve that goal several times in the modern era (1 National Runner-Up, 2 Final Fours, 4 times as a #1 seed, etc. in the last couple decades). Winning a National Championship here is just simply not a fool's dream ... it's something that's almost happened, and we keep reloading to at least be in the conversation. That will always be the ultimate goal until it happens. With that said, it's just asinine to expect every year to be our shot, even in the NIL / portal era. Sometimes, we do need to just appreciate a great season and not get down on a team of which we should be proud simply because we aren't confident we will LITERALLY be the one team that wins the NCAA Tournament. :ROFLMAO:

And I think the TL;DR compromise, at least for me, is this. I know we won't be a Final Four contender every year, and that is okay. I can still be proud and optimistic about the program IF one (admittedly vague) requirement is being met ... and that is no matter how an individual season might be going, I feel we are working toward that ultimate goal in a noticeable and positive way. If we go the next 10 years getting #4 and #5 seeds and we all know in our heart of hearts that those teams don't have a snowball's chance in hell of going on a Final Four run, that's an issue ... because the pieces clearly aren't there to regularly put ourselves in a position to eventually get lucky and win it all. However, if we are getting a top 3 seed in 3 of 5 years, as we have since 2021?! That is absolutely putting ourselves in a position to achieve that goal. Who knows what will happen with this group? If they regain the form they had during the winning streak and even pre-UCLA loss, the sky really is the limit ... if we play like we did at Maryland twice in the Tournament, we are getting bounced in the Second Round (and yes, that IS a disappointment as a #2 seed no matter how you cut it!). I am optimistic that the latter won't happen ... and I am unsure if the former will. Something in between can still give us a very good postseason, and all you can do in March Madness is hope that things fall our way!
I agree with what you're saying and how you're trying to bridge the various "groups" (or even conflicting emotions within the groups) on this board.

I posted this somewhere, but we currently have ~5% betting odds to win it all this year. It would take 14 years just like this to have a ~50% chance. I'd like better odds than that, and there will inevitably be down years, so we will probably need some years with a 1 seed and a 15+% chance. So while I'm very excited with this year, I also recognize it will probably take something even better in the future.
 
#15      
Hey, anybody keeping track of how we're doing vis-a-vis Purdue in all time B1G winning percentage? I thought we were probably down to them by a few games at the start of the year. (I couldn't find a good up to date source on line)
 
#16      
I know there’s a group of fans who don’t necassarily care that we used to stink and now we’re good. To them, it’s Elite Eight or bust. Who cares how far we’ve come? But for those of you who do care how far we’ve come, check this out.

I sorted Torvik by date.

First from, Nov 1, 2020 - today (Ayo/Kofi 1 seed season through this season).

Were ranked #9 in the country in that span. #2 in the B1G only behind Purdue who’s at #6. Ahead of programs like Kansas, Texas Tech, Florida, Michigan, Michigan St, Kentucky, North Carolina, Wisconsin, etc.

Our record is 142-59 (70.6%) and that’s included never missing an NCAAT, All-Americans, first round draft picks, Big Ten Championships, Big Ten Tournament Championships, and a whole lot of good memories.

IMG_0519.jpeg


Then I adjusted the dates. From Nov 1, 2007 - Nov 1, 2020.

In that span, we were ranked #48 in the country. Yes, barely a top 50 program over a 13 year period. Including the new B1G teams, we were #11 in the B1G. If you take those out, #9. These mid majors were ranked higher: VCU, Xavier, Wichita St, Butler, St Mary’s, Creighton, and Memphis.

Our record was 237-198 (545%) and we struggled to just make the NCAA tournament, much less get a good seed or make a run in it.

IMG_0520.jpeg


We’ve come a long way my friends. Enjoy it.
 
#17      
I know there’s a group of fans who don’t necassarily care that we used to stink and now we’re good. To them, it’s Elite Eight or bust. Who cares how far we’ve come? But for those of you who do care how far we’ve come, check this out.

I sorted Torvik by date.

First from, Nov 1, 2020 - today (Ayo/Kofi 1 seed season through this season).

Were ranked #9 in the country in that span. #2 in the B1G only behind Purdue who’s at #6. Ahead of programs like Kansas, Texas Tech, Florida, Michigan, Michigan St, Kentucky, North Carolina, Wisconsin, etc.

Our record is 142-59 (70.6%) and that’s included never missing an NCAAT, All-Americans, first round draft picks, Big Ten Championships, Big Ten Tournament Championships, and a whole lot of good memories.

View attachment 48171

Then I adjusted the dates. From Nov 1, 2007 - Nov 1, 2020.

In that span, we were ranked #48 in the country. Yes, barely a top 50 program over a 13 year period. Including the new B1G teams, we were #11 in the B1G. If you take those out, #9. These mid majors were ranked higher: VCU, Xavier, Wichita St, Butler, St Mary’s, Creighton, and Memphis.

Our record was 237-198 (545%) and we struggled to just make the NCAA tournament, much less get a good seed or make a run in it.

View attachment 48172

We’ve come a long way my friends. Enjoy it.
Its not elite 8 or bust, we're trying to win a championship. Getting close gives us a chance and thats important, but we have one elite 8 in 9 years and got embarrassed, and to dismiss the fans that feel we've shown our ceiling with our in game coaching and we want to build off this momentum and take the next step as people who don't appreciate how far we come is just moronic. Every one of us hopes we're wrong. However, we've been the rationale ones up to this point.
 
#19      
What a great and fun article!

Loved some of these quotes - looks like Mirk agrees with most of us, lol: "Earlier this season, after picking up a third foul that he didn’t agree with, Mirkovic came to the bench and informed everyone, “I swear to God on my mother’s life, I have never had three calls like that bad. Never. On my mother’s life.”

Here is a free link to it:
 
#20      
What a great and fun article!

Loved some of these quotes - looks like Mirk agrees with most of us, lol: "Earlier this season, after picking up a third foul that he didn’t agree with, Mirkovic came to the bench and informed everyone, “I swear to God on my mother’s life, I have never had three calls like that bad. Never. On my mother’s life.”

Here is a free link to it:
The Illini women have six foreigners on their team. One more than the men. Only two play though. Two sit the bench and two were injured all year. None end in vic.
 
#21      
What a great and fun article!
I didn’t ask for any other offers or anything else,” Mirkovic said. “I said, ‘Yeah, I’m ready,’ and that’s it.” ... “Whenever I see somebody with a whistle, they just agitate me.”
 
#23      
I know there’s a group of fans who don’t necassarily care that we used to stink and now we’re good. To them, it’s Elite Eight or bust. Who cares how far we’ve come? But for those of you who do care how far we’ve come, check this out.

I sorted Torvik by date.

First from, Nov 1, 2020 - today (Ayo/Kofi 1 seed season through this season).

Were ranked #9 in the country in that span. #2 in the B1G only behind Purdue who’s at #6. Ahead of programs like Kansas, Texas Tech, Florida, Michigan, Michigan St, Kentucky, North Carolina, Wisconsin, etc.

Our record is 142-59 (70.6%) and that’s included never missing an NCAAT, All-Americans, first round draft picks, Big Ten Championships, Big Ten Tournament Championships, and a whole lot of good memories.

View attachment 48171

Then I adjusted the dates. From Nov 1, 2007 - Nov 1, 2020.

In that span, we were ranked #48 in the country. Yes, barely a top 50 program over a 13 year period. Including the new B1G teams, we were #11 in the B1G. If you take those out, #9. These mid majors were ranked higher: VCU, Xavier, Wichita St, Butler, St Mary’s, Creighton, and Memphis.

Our record was 237-198 (545%) and we struggled to just make the NCAA tournament, much less get a good seed or make a run in it.

View attachment 48172

We’ve come a long way my friends. Enjoy it.
I've got 2 comments/questions
#1 - how was Houston able to play 13 games more than us from 2020 to now?
B. - at least we were ahead of Missouri in 2007 - 2020
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back