So, who would like to take a stab at our player's points per game?
Who is their best player?There's just no other team who can match up with that level of talent.
I would also like to see a bit more size, but 6'9, 250, and can hit a 3? The twins do have a guy like that to practice against, but there aren't many DJ Smirk's in the portal. Fortunately, they can beat on each other in practice.i think (hope) we have sufficient ball handlers. If we are going to add a piece, I wish it were a strong 6-9, 250 lb
ish super senior who could come off the bench to defend a big 4 or post man and take a few of Z and Tomi's fouls.
Also push those two around in practice, help them develop their post games under some physical duress. Oh,
and if this a true holiday wish list, make a Humrichous % from 3. A particularly good fit against Wisconsin, Iowa,
Mich. st.
Mine was:So, who would like to take a stab at our player's points per game?
vaaks - 16Mine was:
Andrej - 17
Vaaks - 14
David - 14
Tomi - 11
Coleman - 10
Z - 7
Jake - 5
Morillo - 4
#9thMan - 2
(pre decimals, obviously)
It's very unlikely that our offense will be as good as, or better than last year. It was a historic offense, and due to some of the ignorant doomsayers after losses, I think it's gone very underrated how hard that is to recreate. And you're removing the guy at the center of it all, in Keaton.vaaks - 16
stojakavic - 15
Mirk - 15
tomi - 12
QC - 11
big z - 6
Jake - 6
morillo - 4
Rest - 3
I think we break the kenpom offense efficiency record this year
I don't see it either. Yes they have a ton of talent, likely more than any other team. But most years that's the case. I curious what makes this year's Duke roster any more ridiculous than any other year since the 90s?Who is their best player?
They have zero lottery picks in this mock draft I googled
NBA Mock Draft - NBADraft.net
Specializing in drafts with top players on the NBA horizon, player profiles, scouting reports, rankings and prospective international recruits.www.nbadraft.net
A good and deep team that belongs in the national title picture without question, but I'm not sure where the hushed tones of this being an all-time collection of talent are coming from.
If we play at the same pace we would probably shatter it to score 88 points per gamevaaks - 16
stojakavic - 15
Mirk - 15
tomi - 12
QC - 11
big z - 6
Jake - 6
morillo - 4
Rest - 3
I think we break the kenpom offense efficiency record this year
I'm probably going to catch some flack for this but a historically great offense isn't historically great if doesn't work against elite competition. The 2005 offense showed up against everyone because the ball movement was so good, they were incredibly hard to guard despite playing 3 6'2 guards and a 6'6 power forward.Beautiful basketball. We did have some possessions like this last year. The game where we robbed the f'ing bank comes to mind. But I do think the true beauty of our historically great offense is its simplicity. However, that's also what people like the least about it.
If we’re saying 88 points per 40 at 65.7 possessions… that would mean 1.339 points per possession for year. That’s impossible. (last year we were at 1.249; Purdue was at 1.246)If we play at the same pace we would probably shatter it to score 88 points per game
Frontcourt?Think they’re going to add another piece …
Yeah, Duke’s roster is absurd and makes no sense as it breaks all the rules of how you would think kids make their college decisions.I feel like one of the more crazy stories is that of this guy:
![]()
Sebastian Wilkins, Brewster Academy Bobcats, Power Forward
Sebastian Wilkins is a 6-8, 215-pound Forward from Groton, MA.247sports.com
He was a top 35 recruit who redshirted this past season because he wouldn’t get playing time. Think about that: a top 35 recruit coming to Illinois, or anywhere not named Duke, and redshirting.
Then, to make matters even more absurd, he chose to come back this season, and will be entering the year as the presumed 11th man. Literally, the 11th man.
And if it isn’t him, then it’ll be one of their top 15 recruits — Rippey, Howard, or Williams. Or 16 year old Joaquim Boumtje Boumtje, who’s being labeled as one of the most high-ceiling big men for the next few years. Or Belmont transfer Drew Scharnowski, who’d start on like 90% of rosters.
Plus, they landed a go-to scorer in Blackwell from the portal. And Boozer, Foster, Sarr, Ngomba all returned.
How on earth do you put together that much talent on one college basketball team?
Given the roster continuity we have to open the season alongside guys presumably knowing roles more, I’d hope for better.Let’s say our non con is UCONN / Duke / Mizzou / TTU / Houston / UNC.
What’s the O/U for wins… 2.5? 3.5?
3-3 would be most realistic, IMO.
There’s absolutely a world where that gauntlet burries you if the team doesn’t have things figured out, right out of the gates. But yes, lots of opportunities for big wins.
Another thing about Duke, is when Scheyer hasn’t had a transcendent, NPOY type player on his roster he’s merely had okay seasons by Duke standards, finishing 2nd and 3rd in a very watered down ACC. And while this years roster does have a ton of talent, it doesn’t have anyone close to a Flagg or a Boozer.I don't see it either. Yes they have a ton of talent, likely more than any other team. But most years that's the case. I curious what makes this year's Duke roster any more ridiculous than any other year since the 90s?
Seems to be a great advantage if you can play 7-8 at a time. Not so much if 5 on the floor with an 8 man rotation.Yeah, Duke’s roster is absurd and makes no sense as it breaks all the rules of how you would think kids make their college decisions.
What makes it different from those Kentucky teams that went 10-11 deep is it has a ton of experienced players on it as well- it’s not all 5 star freshman
Just at G- Blackwell, Rippey, Boozer, Foster all think they are running the offense this year - it could be a disaster or they somehow all accept their roles and they are a juggernaut
There’s a limit because:I still don’t see how there is a limit. Some teams want to make it a grind game and keep possessions and shots low and others want to run and get shots up within a certain time on the shot clock.
If they’re made baskets that’s a different story. Then there are other aspects to the sport, like rebounds, creating turnovers with the defense.
The number of possessions can be manipulated.
Did you just notice this recently? Because they've been doing this for at least 30 years now. They had a team in the mid to late 90s (can't remember which year exactly) that had 9 McDonalds All-Americans on it, a few who were top 5 players.I feel like one of the more crazy stories is that of this guy:
![]()
Sebastian Wilkins, Brewster Academy Bobcats, Power Forward
Sebastian Wilkins is a 6-8, 215-pound Forward from Groton, MA.247sports.com
He was a top 35 recruit who redshirted this past season because he wouldn’t get playing time. Think about that: a top 35 recruit coming to Illinois, or anywhere not named Duke, and redshirting.
Then, to make matters even more absurd, he chose to come back this season, and will be entering the year as the presumed 11th man. Literally, the 11th man.
5
And if it isn’t him, then it’ll be one of their top 15 recruits — Rippey, Howard, or Williams. Or 16 year old Joaquim Boumtje Boumtje, who’s being labeled as one of the most high-ceiling big men for the next few years. Or Belmont transfer Drew Scharnowski, who’d start on like 90% of rosters.
Plus, they landed a go-to scorer in Blackwell from the portal. And Boozer, Foster, Sarr, Ngomba all returned.
How on earth do you put together that much talent on one college basketball team?
It's very unlikely that our offense will be as good as, or better than last year. It was a historic offense, and due to some of the ignorant doomsayers after losses, I think it's gone very underrated how hard that is to recreate. And you're removing the guy at the center of it all, in Keaton.
It's also reasonable to say our defense will take a step back. Illinois finished 20th last year in D-efficiency. We're losing Kylan/Keaton/Ben and replacing them with objectively worse individual defenders.
I think where we'll need to make up that ground is luck. We finished 308th last year, and lost several close finishes. A lot of it had to do with subpar officiating. Hopefully those margins will be in our favor this year.
Interesting take and I see the logic. But I am sure the Illinois staff would not agree.Listened to the Trotter pod and he made 2 very valid points as to why we might not be as good next year. First is that it’s unreasonable to expect us to have a historically good offense so offense will likely drop at least a little, and then we likely won’t be as good defensively either with the losses of Kylan, Keaton and Ben. And so a team that isn’t as good offensively or defensively won’t be as good overall.
And that got me thinking, particularly about the defensive end. Kylan is certainly known as a defender and had his moments last year but I would contend he had a bad year defensively at least for him. Thornton, Philon, Boyd in the BTT, Stirtz in the E8. Kylan got cooked a lot last year. And in the tourney, Drej was our shut down defender and Iowa probably beats us if he didn’t have a 6’7 wing to throw on Stirtz and bother him with length.
So I guess I’m wondering, if we get that version of Drej all year (big if I know) such that we have a lock down defender on the perimeter, could we be better on the perimeter even if Coleman isn’t quite as good a defender as Keaton (not a given. Kid competes). And as amazing as it is to say, is Ben the player we will miss the most defensively?
I get what Trotter is saying and good chance he’s right but I’m not convinced we can’t replace at least last year’s version of Kylan defensively.
Should be free link:The Athletic has us #1 in their latest preseason poll.