Illini Basketball 2026-2027

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,627      
We will see. This is far from over either way from what I have heard.
When Underwood was asked about having an open roster spot and he was just being coy, does he have a thought in his mind to save a spot for any kind of crazy last second addition if this were to come to fruition?
 
#1,630      
Not sure when this is from? Just popped up on my YouTube account.
IMG_1272.jpeg
 
#1,633      
UConn for me.

1) Revenge and finally beating them / Hurley after a couple high profile losses.

2) Finally get a marquee win at the UC again.

3) I’ll be there, and it’s my birthday weekend!
How were you able to source tickets?
 
#1,635      
Haven't seen or heard much of Morillo in the highlight videos. Was impressed by him in the US vs International game.
 
#1,636      
Gotta be honest, I think QC will give us some athleticism and “chip on your shoulder” grit on defense as well. Vaaks will have an improved system, along with a Crocker Defensive Scheme the others are far more acclimated to. Add to the mix Williams off the bench, a speedier tempo, and continued rim protection from the Ivisii, we could see a noticeable improvement in defense over last year.

Maybe not #1, but I don’t see why we can’t be top 10 there. And really, that feels about what we just need given the offense. Metrics don’t like our style of play though going after rebounds more than steals and slowing opposing offenses, so it might skew things, but more balance could help.

I will say though, this is the side of the ball I’ve been most nervous about in the off season. Offense I feel strong with the playmakers and shot creators we have. Defensively, if we can create more literal stops this year we are a definitive natty contender.
I like it.
 
#1,637      
We will see. This is far from over either way from what I have heard.
I still think this was the most foreseeable outcome of this, to the point that it almost seems intentional by the NCAA to have another piece of "chaos" to point to and beg for legislative help.

All of their losses have been about not limiting folks' economic rights in an arbitrary way and saying one group gets 5 years but not the other is wildly arbitrary.
 
#1,639      
I still think this was the most foreseeable outcome of this, to the point that it almost seems intentional by the NCAA to have another piece of "chaos" to point to and beg for legislative help.

All of their losses have been about not limiting folks' economic rights in an arbitrary way and saying one group gets 5 years but not the other is wildly arbitrary.

Amazing how far the pendulum has swung towards the athletes. The NCAA was feared for so long time with their tremendous power over athletes through eligibility. What money they got had to be under the table.
 
#1,641      
Amazing how far the pendulum has swung towards the athletes. The NCAA was feared for so long time with their tremendous power over athletes through eligibility. What money they got had to be under the table.
The NCAA got 1.1 billion for the rights to the tournament. They got plenty of money over the table.
 
#1,644      
Give me a tie that ends with both teams winning


Keaton and Domask are super close offensively IMO (meant to be a huge compliment to Marcus). And TSJ the best college player of the group by far.

But i actually think i pick 2025-26 pretty easily. That 2024 group was down at 80th defensively. Last year's roster would just be too big and would require Guerrier and Coleman to hit a crazy amount of three's and i straight up don't think Ty could have played.

That said, I think 2024 was a masterclass of a coaching year by Brad. Talent wise, they really weren't final four worthy, But he spammed TSJ, and turned Domask into a superstar. For my money, they ended the year as the 3rd best team in the sport, which is kinda wild.
 
#1,645      
You can be fast and efficient. See Alabama.

We actually started last year playing relatively fast. We were a little more aggressive about looking for fast break opportunities. But the bigger driver behind the fast tempo was taking shots earlier in the half court.

Then Keaton came along and we realized the most efficient thing we could do is just put the ball in his hands and let him work. Given enough time, we knew the defense would make a mistake before Keaton would.

I don't think Vaaks is quite as methodical as Keaton. In fact, he led a pretty fast offense last year. So, that alone will increase our tempo relative to last year.
when i was growing up, i watched the NBA. (before MJ) and the fast break was a Boston Celtic tool with 3-4 white guys. my
point is they didnt beat the other team down the court often but the retreat by the D left open shooters outside and they had
shooters.
 
#1,648      
I still think this was the most foreseeable outcome of this, to the point that it almost seems intentional by the NCAA to have another piece of "chaos" to point to and beg for legislative help.

All of their losses have been about not limiting folks' economic rights in an arbitrary way and saying one group gets 5 years but not the other is wildly arbitrary.
Not sure about this. It has always been the case that players have four years of eligibility with a few exceptions a fifth. Covid is one of those exceptions. Have to draw the line somewhere. Should a player the year before the covid exception be allowed to come back and play another year because they only got four years? Just thinking out loud. Life isn’t fair, but I am not sure this is an issue of fairness anyway. This is about money.
 
#1,649      
Not sure about this. It has always been the case that players have four years of eligibility with a few exceptions a fifth. Covid is one of those exceptions. Have to draw the line somewhere. Should a player the year before the covid exception be allowed to come back and play another year because they only got four years? Just thinking out loud. Life isn’t fair, but I am not sure this is an issue of fairness anyway. This is about money.
Covid players got 5 years to play, there were multiple 6th year players. A pandemic is not the same.

NCAA set criteria for 5 and 5 then said a specific group wouldn't qualify even though they met the criteria.

It was wildly arbitrary and so dumb that it's easy to believe it was intentional.
 
#1,650      
Covid players got 5 years to play, there were multiple 6th year players. A pandemic is not the same.

NCAA set criteria for 5 and 5 then said a specific group wouldn't qualify even though they met the criteria.

It was wildly arbitrary and so dumb that it's easy to believe it was intentional.
Think of when the rule was made. Teams had already committed to NIL for players, and suddenly the pool changes. Now, after teams have been working toward next season, this is dumped on them. At this point, what can Brad do? Bringing in someone of starter caliber will be disruptive in numerous ways. I get the win-at-all-costs mentality, but this will have ripple effects on team chemistry. I doubt very much that better teams will be interested in these guys this late in the process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back