I've been wishing that myself.I wish one could ignore by talking point: CYQ (coach yelling quotient), "i'm not sold on epps," underwood can't keep guards happy...
I've been wishing that myself.I wish one could ignore by talking point: CYQ (coach yelling quotient), "i'm not sold on epps," underwood can't keep guards happy...
I like Epps and saw him as a guy that will stick around a few years and improve. He’s apparently is gone. Watching the makeup of teams in the NCAA tournament this year has shown you can get players that can help your program quickly. I expect Underwood and company to do that. Epps is solid but hardly irreplaceable.Losing Epps is a devastating blow if for no other reason than there’s no one else on the roster that can do what he does.
Lots of pressure on DGL. He better show up and be ready for 30+ minutes a night. Morretti is nowhere close physically to even be an option next year. I watched Robert film him on warms ups and he looked like a HS player
I've had my doubts for a while now, especially offensively. Brad needs "dudes" to have an even middling offense, guys like Ayo who could get their own shot any time they wanted, or Kofi who just was too big to stop down low. Even when he has those guys, the lack of a cohesive offense is still glaring most of the time.What did Underwood do this year that made everyone turn on him? It's not like he started yelling at players this year He also had to replace every starter from last year and still made the tournament. I want a tournament run as much as the next guy, but is the Arkansas game the make or break on if he can coach or not? I'm just kind of confused. Do you remember what this program looked like when he took over?
You mean the trend where 1600 players from 360 schools are gonna enter the transfer portal?
Just spit ballin here ...and not sure it would hold up legally....but could schools or (boosters of NIL money) have athletes sign 2 maybe 3 year contracts? Then if student/athlete leaves early for whatever reason, they would have to pay a portion of that money back??? Or the student/athlete's new school or booster NIL money source would have to pay a buyout.....much the same way coaches salaries and buyouts are handled???Good luck. If schools had their way students would still be only getting their scholly and a free meal or two.
The supreme court thought otherwise.
Trent and Ayo would like a word with youI wish one could ignore by talking point: CYQ (coach yelling quotient), "i'm not sold on epps," underwood can't keep guards happy...
Georgetown also has special appeal to Hampton Roads kids going back to Allen Iverson.Georgetown is close to home (Norfolk 3 hour drive, not hard for mom and dad to make it to games), Ed Cooley connection (originally committed to him at Providence). Georgetown obviously hunting for multi-year talent. Makes so much sense for Epps.
There you go spouting facts and being objective on Loyalty. Don't you know that's not allowed?What did Underwood do this year that made everyone turn on him? It's not like he started yelling at players this year He also had to replace every starter from last year and still made the tournament. I want a tournament run as much as the next guy, but is the Arkansas game the make or break on if he can coach or not? I'm just kind of confused. Do you remember what this program looked like when he took over?
I think because of his age some people don’t realize how unproven he is relative to other coaches.
He inherited a team at SFA that won the conference the year before. He spent 3 years there, which were some of SFA‘s best years ever, but his best players were recruited by the previous coach, and he moved to OSU before he could see a class he recruited graduate.
OSU was a rollercoster season including a streak they lost 6 in a row. He also inherited Juwan Evans who had a drop in 2FG%, 3FG%, FT%, etc compared to previous year with Travis Ford. They lost first game in both conference and NCAA tourney.
Outside those 4 years his HC career is with Illinois and I think most at this point consider it meh.
How did he under achieve? He had basically a new team and unfortunately they just didn’t gel. All this portal stuff is new. Coaches are trying to figure it out.The defense of Underwood as if he can do no wrong baffles me on here sometimes. The question should be what he DIDN'T do. We underachieved big time this year and have had very little success in the tournament. I see some people blame everyone but him. He needs to do better.
some are figuring it out better and faster than othersHow did he under achieve? He had basically a new team and unfortunately they just didn’t gel. All this portal stuff is new. Coaches are trying to figure it out.
I don't know that I've seen anyone suggest he can do no wrong, but most of the criticism seems to be about a particular trait (being animated and loud) that is extremely common in the coaching ranks, or that he's somehow a complete failure despite being the most successful in-conference coach in terms of W/L for 4 years running. Plus 2 regular season titles (F U Michigan) and 1 BTT title.The defense of Underwood as if he can do no wrong baffles me on here sometimes. The question should be what he DIDN'T do. We underachieved big time this year and have had very little success in the tournament. I see some people blame everyone but him. He needs to do better.
I don't know about anyone else, but this season it seemed particularly hard for him to get his team motivated prior to tip.I don't know that I've seen anyone suggest he can do no wrong, but most of the criticism seems to be about a particular trait (being animated and loud) that is extremely common in the coaching ranks, or that he's somehow a complete failure despite being the most successful in-conference coach in terms of W/L for 4 years running. Plus 2 regular season titles (F U Michigan) and 1 BTT title.
Yes, there are things he needs to improve, most importantly showing guys the pine when they aren't running the schemes, but calling him a failure or trash or many of the other things that get thrown around here just isn't accurate. Good recruiter, good X and O guy, good motivator for a certain type of player, but with some glaring weaknesses that he needs to address.
Not win as much as the armchair coaches expected. To be fair to the armchair coaches, a nearly $6 million salary raises expectations.What did Underwood do this year that made everyone turn on him?
Given that online college sports spaces have only two settings: "coach cannot be criticized" and "coach must be fired", I think it's actually pretty extraordinary how LITTLE there is defense of Underwood as if he can do no wrong around here.The defense of Underwood as if he can do no wrong baffles me on here sometimes.
Probably? I would assume this would required significant changes to NCAA bylaws & enterprise strategy. The NCAA seems to be pushing schools in the opposite direction in an effort to honor amateurism and maximize profits.Just spit ballin here ...and not sure it would hold up legally....but could schools or (boosters of NIL money) have athletes sign 2 maybe 3 year contracts? Then if student/athlete leaves early for whatever reason, they would have to pay a portion of that money back??? Or the student/athlete's new school or booster NIL money source would have to pay a buyout.....much the same way coaches salaries and buyouts are handled???
I wish one could ignore by talking point: CYQ (coach yelling quotient), "i'm not sold on epps," underwood can't keep guards happy...
He makes 4.2 mil…..Not win as much as the armchair coaches expected. To be fair to the armchair coaches, a nearly $6 million salary raises expectations.
I want a tournament run as much as the next guy, but is the Arkansas game the make or break on if he can coach or not? I'm just kind of confused. Do you remember what this program looked like when he took over?
I like your post. I don't think it was for lack of trying for BU. Whether he's yelling, talking up his players in press conference/interviews, celebrating with them after games, he's always trying to motivate him. We lacked a floor general/leader. Had a guy like Trent or Ayo been on this team I'm convinced we'd have been battling UConn in the Sweet 16 with a chance to win it all. My two knocks are that I don't care for the offense and lack of in-game adjustments. A leader/floor general also helps with both of those deficiencies. A lot of people freak out on here that we only had 20 wins and got bounced again early by a good team in the tournament w/out a PG/player leader and an entirely new team. I think our trajectory is still on a very good path. How many teams could get to 20 wins in a power 5 conference with a tough preseason schedule when it's an entirely new team? I don't believe very many. We were one true veteran PG away from being extremely good. Let's find that guy in the portal and bring most of this team back next year and enjoy watching the newly found chemistry while we make a deep run. ILL!I don't know about anyone else, but this season it seemed particularly hard for him to get his team motivated prior to tip.
Not sure if that is a BU thing or just a team leadership/ chemistry thing