Illini Football 2026

#301      
Whoever is in charge of fundraising and allocating money are the main recruiters in my eyes right now.

If school A is going to pay $100k more than school B, I don’t think a great relationship with a personnel staffer or position coach matter.

That makes sense when recruits are commanding that kind of money. A lot of these kids we are bringing in are getting less than 100k. I know we weren’t the highest offer for Konkey. Also for an example I think Wagler was making like 40k in nil when he came on campus
 
#305      
#307      
Martin O'Donnell absolutely glazing Bart in the latest Inquirer Podcast. Something along the lines of "I know the results on the field the last couple years weren't what people wanted but I've seen him coach in practice and man can he coach in practice."
To quote Moneyball "If he's a good hitter why doesn't he hit good?"
Alex Legion and Hutch were all Americans at practice too. On field results are really all that matter.
 
#308      
Martin O'Donnell absolutely glazing Bart in the latest Inquirer Podcast. Something along the lines of "I know the results on the field the last couple years weren't what people wanted but I've seen him coach in practice and man can he coach in practice."
To quote Moneyball "If he's a good hitter why doesn't he hit good?"
Alex Legion and Hutch were all Americans at practice too. On field results are really all that matter.
He had all five returning starters last year and those guys looked like they’d never played football when we played IU. Then they turned it on against USC but couldn’t keep it consistent.

He’s got one more shot this year with four new starters in this program (yes some with prior experience). If it is still like last year, he’s gotta go.
 
#309      
Or it could be positive that someone was good enough to beat him out
There's 3 spots available on the D Line. Not even being a starter very likely implies he wasn't the marquee addition he was thought to be.

It's unfortunate because when we lost all our D Lineman, it was said we would upgrade. That was never my expectation to begin with, but at least figured we'd find competent replacements.

Pair that with a completely unknown kicking game, after losing one of the best kickers in the country, it's unrealistic to think our lucrative record in close games will remain.

I'm higher on the OL than most people. We're bigger, and Bart has been very good with development.
 
#311      
Martin O'Donnell absolutely glazing Bart in the latest Inquirer Podcast. Something along the lines of "I know the results on the field the last couple years weren't what people wanted but I've seen him coach in practice and man can he coach in practice."
To quote Moneyball "If he's a good hitter why doesn't he hit good?"
Alex Legion and Hutch were all Americans at practice too. On field results are really all that matter.
Martin’s employer just signed a very large deal with the athletic department to be put on a jersey patch……
 
#312      
There's 3 spots available on the D Line. Not even being a starter very likely implies he wasn't the marquee addition he was thought to be.

It's unfortunate because when we lost all our D Lineman, it was said we would upgrade. That was never my expectation to begin with, but at least figured we'd find competent replacements.

Pair that with a completely unknown kicking game, after losing one of the best kickers in the country, it's unrealistic to think our lucrative record in close games will remain.

I'm higher on the OL than most people. We're bigger, and Bart has been very good with development.
You should be familiar with the Illinois kicker.
 
#313      
#314      
He had all five returning starters last year and those guys looked like they’d never played football when we played IU. Then they turned it on against USC but couldn’t keep it consistent.

He’s got one more shot this year with four new starters in this program (yes some with prior experience). If it is still like last year, he’s gotta go.
The IU game needs to be a wash. Quite possibly the best team we've played in the last decade.
 
#315      
Martin O'Donnell absolutely glazing Bart in the latest Inquirer Podcast. Something along the lines of "I know the results on the field the last couple years weren't what people wanted but I've seen him coach in practice and man can he coach in practice."
To quote Moneyball "If he's a good hitter why doesn't he hit good?"
Alex Legion and Hutch were all Americans at practice too. On field results are really all that matter.

The "you should see Bart Miller in practice" quotes have officially reached Alex Legion territory.
 
#316      
I don't follow football nearly as close as basketball. What is a realistic win total this year? Any chance they are as good as the last 2 years?
 
#318      
I don't follow football nearly as close as basketball. What is a realistic win total this year? Any chance they are as good as the last 2 years?
Realistic? anywhere between 7 and 10.
If they don't win 6, it's a failure of a season. There are 6 "even if we crap our pants we should win" games on this schedule.
They should win 7 even if everything goes against us.
They'll win 8 if toss up games split.
9 or 10 means things have fallen in our favor; 10 if everything goes 100% perfectly. If they win more than 10, either we are severely underestimating the team or the coaches or are severely over estimating the rest of the league.

That 7.5 O/U line is a perfect placement.
 
#319      
Realistic? anywhere between 7 and 10.
If they don't win 6, it's a failure of a season. There are 6 "even if we crap our pants we should win" games on this schedule.
They should win 7 even if everything goes against us.
They'll win 8 if toss up games split.
9 or 10 means things have fallen in our favor; 10 if everything goes 100% perfectly. If they win more than 10, either we are severely underestimating the team or the coaches or are severely over estimating the rest of the league.

That 7.5 O/U line is a perfect placement.
Connelly’s SP+ puts us at 7.0-5.0 which sounds about right.

Here’s our schedule breakdown from most difficult to least with our own SP+ ranking included for reference:

D2. SIU
124. UAB
82. Purdue
67. Michigan St
53. Maryland
49. Northwestern
48. UCLA
44. Duke
37. Nebraska
33. Illinois
22. Iowa
2. Oregon
1. Ohio St

9 of the teams we play are ranked lower than us on SP+, but obviously you don’t beat every team that’s ranked lower than you, especially when we’re talking about + or - a few spots.

If we divide up the schedule like this:

25 spots or more below: automatic win
25 spots or more above: automatic loss
Within 24 spots: split 50/50

4 automatic wins. 2 automatic losses. Then the remaining 6 games split 50/50 puts us at 7-5.

I don’t necessarily see 6 games that “even if we crap our pants we should win”. I’d say there’s 4 of those. But still, overall a very favorable schedule.
 
#321      
Realistic? anywhere between 7 and 10.
If they don't win 6, it's a failure of a season. There are 6 "even if we crap our pants we should win" games on this schedule.
They should win 7 even if everything goes against us.
They'll win 8 if toss up games split.
9 or 10 means things have fallen in our favor; 10 if everything goes 100% perfectly. If they win more than 10, either we are severely underestimating the team or the coaches or are severely over estimating the rest of the league.

That 7.5 O/U line is a perfect placement.
It’s also possible that any of the higher ranked teams could crap their pants. Thats why we play the games.
 
Back