That was xavier scottYeah honestly that's a good sign for cb2 Morris
That was xavier scottYeah honestly that's a good sign for cb2 Morris
Yeah honestly that's a good sign for cb2 Morris
The commentator really called him Laughery.
Yea thats against X so even more impressive.
It's ESPN, why would you expect they have any working knowledge of the B1G?The commentator really called him Laughery.
Thanks didn't know he changed #'sThat was xavier scott
X Scott and/or Matt Bailey might be more integral parts to the team than all of those guys.
X Scott and/or Matt Bailey might be more integral parts to the team than all of those guys.
offense onlyX Scott and/or Matt Bailey might be more integral parts to the team than all of those guys.
That drive was everything that is glorious about BERTBALL. Eat the clock, pound the rock, score at the end to win the game. Beautiful!!!
I have high expectations that Valentine is going to have the kind of year that will make us very happy .That drive was everything that is glorious about BERTBALL. Eat the clock, pound the rock, score at the end to win the game. Beautiful!!!
Aidan Laughery too.I have high expectations that Valentine is going to have the kind of year that will make us very happy .
he’s just been snake bit with little injuries.Aidan Laughery too.
That defense was phenomenal. I think it was 1990ish when we played Arizona tough. If that team had an offense that complimented the defense we might have won the Big Ten that year. The Tepper years were frustrating from an offense perspective. Other than Greg Landry as the OC for a year or so Tepper neglected having a good offense.
which coach had the more negative effect on the program : Tepper or Beckman ?That defense was phenomenal. I think it was 1990ish when we played Arizona tough. If that team had an offense that complimented the defense we might have won the Big Ten that year. The Tepper years were frustrating from an offense perspective. Other than Greg Landry as the OC for a year or so Tepper neglected having a good offense.
You serious, Clark? Beckman, and i dont think its even that close.which coach had the more negative effect on the program : Tepper or Beckman ?
I agree about Beckman , but Tepper took a program with really strong recruiting / records & at his firing we were crap . we were really good when Tepper took over . but not for long.You serious, Clark? Beckman, and i dont think its even that close.
No way....Tepper was far worse. He inherited a really strong program from Mackovic and ran it into the ground. An average coach would have won 2-3 games more a year than Tepper did.You serious, Clark? Beckman, and i dont think its even that close.